A comparative study of the victim's fault in civil liability of the police in Iranian and French law
Tóm tắt
In the event of losses and damages, the civil liability prevailing in the legal system of that country always determines the share of responsibility of each person (injured and harmed) in compensating for the damage. It is critical to define the contribution of the civil liability of the victim and the police in some of the damages that occurred in the presence of the police. The present study is a descriptive-analytical study that examines the existing rules and foundations in the field of civil responsibility based on a library study and by using data collection and examination of laws, judicial procedures, and legal perspectives to examine and apply the two legal systems of Iran and France. The case deals with the role of the victim's fault in the civil liability of the police. Based on the results of the investigation of civil liability of the police, it can be different depending on the conditions of doing the act and omission as well as whether or not the act or omission of the police is at fault. Also, in the legal system of both countries under review, considering the role of the victim's fault in the harmful act can relieve the civil liability of the police, and there is a difference between fault and absolute responsibility. Therefore, establishing the relationship of causation in this and the role of the victim based on the existing rules, including the rule of warning, and the law of joint and comparative fault, in some cases can even relieve the civil liability of the police.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Mathiesen T. The politics of abolition revisited. Routledge; 2014.
Terrill W, Paoline EA III. Examining less lethal force policy and the force continuum: Results from a national use-of-force study. Police Q. 2013;16(1):38–65.
Broadhurst R, Davies S. Policing in context: an introduction to police work in Australia. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Alpert GP, Smith WC. How reasonable is the reasonable man: police and excessive force. J Crim L Criminol. 1994;85:481.
Bashiri A, Khosrowi K, Chianeh KN. Review, deliberate fault in the field of civil liability in Iranian and French law. REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS. 2019;12(2):557–78.
Vaughn MS. Police civil liability for abandonment in high crime areas and other high risk situations. J Crim Just. 1994;22(5):407–24.
Lee H, Vaughn MS. Organizational factors that contribute to police deadly force liability. J Crim Just. 2010;38(2):193–206.
Federal Tort Claims Act and Ft Claims Act and French Law of Go ench Law of Governmental Liability: ernmental liability: a comparative study Sidney B. Jacoby
Eberle EJ. The methodology of comparative law. Roger Williams University Law Rev. 2011;16(1):51.
Chamallas M, Wriggins JB. The measure of injury: race, gender, and tort law. New York: NYU Press; 2010.
Hashemzadeh A. Role of lost fault in driving penalties. Res History. 2014;4(4):61–79.
Busnelli FD, Comandé G, Cousy H, Dobbs DB, Dufwa BW, Faure MG, Widmer P. Principles of European tort law: text and commentary. Berlin: Springer; 2005.
Amouzadrad Z. The role of injured person’s fault in compensation for traffic accidents in Iranian and french civil law. CIFILE J Int Law. 2022;3:19.
Heydari G, Ameri P. A comparative study of the principles of civil liability in iranian and american law. Int Relat Res. 2018;8(2):263–92.
Hart HLA, Honoré T. Causation in the Law. Oxford: OUP Oxford; 1985.
Oleksandr S, Iryna K, Yuliia D, Nataliia Z, Oksana P. Civil liability of police officers in France. J Legal Ethical Regul Isses. 2019;22:1.
Bermann GA, Picard E. Introduction to French law. Kluwer Law International BV. 2008.
Cartwright J, Fauvarque-Cosson B, Whittaker S. The new provisions of the Code civil created by Ordonnance. 2016.
Erdelevskyi AM. Compensation for non-pecuniary damage: analysis and commentary on legislation and judicial practice. Moskow: Volters Kluver; 2004.
Kidner R. Casebook on torts. USA: Oxford University Press; 2012.
Winfield PH. The province of the Law of Tort, vol. 193. Cambridge: CUP Archive; 1931.
Wharton, F., & Torcia, C. E. (1989). Wharton's criminal procedure
Rahimi H, Khayati Gargari M. The role of injured in police civil liability (A comparative study in Iranian and English law). Private Law. 2017;5(17):9–40.
Sarbazian M, Sokhanvar M, Pordanjani AR. Principles of civil liability arising from bodily injuries in Iranian and English Law. J Pol L. 2017;10:8.
Walker SE. The new world of police accountability. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2005.
Garner BA. Black's Law dictionary. 2004.
Jabbari M, Shoarian E. Police Civil Liability (A comparative study). Forouzwsh Publications. 2009.
Alpert GP. A factorial analysis of police pursuit driving decisions: a research note. Just Q. 1998;15:347.
Dunham RG, Alpert GP, Kenny DJ, Cromwell P. High-speed pursuit: The offenders’ perspective. Crim Justice Behav. 1998;25(1):30–45.
Eisenberg C, Fitzpatrick C. An alternative to police pursuits. FBI L Enforcement Bull. 1996;65:16.
Harpwood VH. Modern Tort Law 7/e. Routledge; 2009.
Article 1384 paragraph 4 of the French Civil Code.
Nasirifar E, Bashokuh M. Study civil liability arising from omission in Iran’s legal system. J Soc Sci Human Res. 2017;5(01):54–9.
Kazemi M. The effect of the injured personâ s act in civil responsibility. Quarterly J Judicial Law Views. 2023;17(57):79–104.
Bariklou AR. Civil Libility, 5th Ed, Nashr mizan, Tehran (In Persian). 2014.
Van Dam C. European tort law. Oxford: OUP; 2013.
Giliker P. Vicarious liability in tort: A comparative perspective, vol. 69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Neubauer DW, Fradella HF. America’s courts and the criminal justice system. Cengage Learning; 2018.
Walker S, Katz CM. The police in America. McGraw-Hill; 2012.
Thériault-Marois A. La faute civile des forces policières en droit québécois). 2023.
Salmond JW, Fitzgerald PJ. Salmond on jurisprudence, Edition 12. Sweet & Maxwell; 1966.
Barker DL. Law made simple. Routledge; 2020.
Vogel FE, Hayes SL. Islamic law and finance: religion, risk, and return, vol. 16. Brill; 1998.
El-Awa MAS. The theory of punishment in Islamic law: a comparative study (Doctoral dissertation, SOAS University of London). 1972.
Calabresi G, Melamed AD. Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: one view of the cathedral. Econ Anal Law Sel Read. 2004;19–33.
Regan DH. The problem of social cost revisited. J Law Econ. 1972;15(2):427–37.
Kadish SH, Schulhofer SJ, Barkow RE. Criminal Law and its processes: cases and materials [Connected eBook with Study Center]. Aspen Publishing; 2022.
Keeton P, Prosser WL. Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts. (No Title). 1984.
Dobbs DB, Hayden PT, Bublick EM. Torts and compensation: personal accountability and social responsibility for injury. West Academic Concise ed., 8th ed. 2017.
French Court Strikes Down Law Limiting Police Liability for Excessive Force, The New York Times. 2016;4.