A comparative study of carbon emission reduction modes in supply chain under carbon tax mechanism
Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Trang 1-41 - 2023
Tóm tắt
The carbon emission abatement within supply chain is an important part of the realization of carbon emission reduction target. This paper first establishes a supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer and then proposes three modes of carbon abatement under carbon tax mechanism, namely carbon abatement by manufacturer alone (M-mode), by retailer alone (R-mode) and by manufacturer and retailer jointly (J-mode). Based on profit maximization, the Stackelberg game model is adopted to get the optimal decisions, and then, the optimization results under three modes are compared and the sensitivity analyses are carried out. The results show that the impacts of carbon tax on the manufacturer profit and retailer profit under three modes are complex and subject to the changes in the external environment. The carbon abatement level, the market demand, the profit of manufacturer and retailer are all the highest under J-mode, and hence, the J-mode is the optimal choice for the manufacturer and retailer. The management insight is that the firms and the government should increase the publicity of low-carbon products to improve the greenness of products, the market demand, profits and social welfare. The government should consider the external environment to set different levels of carbon tax according to different targets.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alegoz, M., Kaya, O., & Bayindir, Z. P. (2021). A comparison of pure manufacturing and hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing systems under carbon tax policy. European Journal of Operational Research, 294(1), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.01.018
Cao, K., Xu, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). Should firms provide online return service for remanufactured products? Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122641
Cesur, A., Cetin, I. Z., Cetin, M., Sevik, H., & Ozel, H. B. (2022). The Use of Cupressus arizonica as a Biomonitor of Li, Fe, and Cr Pollution in Kastamonu. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05667-w
Cetin, M., Aljama, A. M. O., Alrabiti, O. B. M., Adiguzel, F., Sevik, H., & Cetin, I. Z. (2022). Using Topsoil Analysis to Determine and Map Changes in Ni Co Pollution. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05762-y
Chen, W., Chen, J., & Ma, Y. (2021). Renewable energy investment and carbon emissions under cap-and-trade mechanisms. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123341
Dou, G., Guo, H., Zhang, Q., & Li, X. (2019). A two-period carbon tax regulation for manufacturing and remanufacturing production planning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.064
Du, W., & Li, M. (2020). Assessing the impact of environmental regulation on pollution abatement and collaborative emissions reduction: Micro-evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106382
Fuli, G., Foropon, C., & Xin, M. (2020). Reducing carbon emissions in humanitarian supply chain: The role of decision making and coordination. Annals of Operations Research, 319, 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03671-z
Gao, F., & Souza, G. C. (2022). Carbon offsetting with eco-conscious consumers. Management Science, 68(11), 7793–8514. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4293
Ghosh, P. K., Manna, A. K., Dey, J. K., & Kar, S. (2021). Supply chain coordination model for green product with different payment strategies: A game theoretic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125734
He, P., Wang, Z., Shi, V., & Liao, Y. (2021). The direct and cross effects in a supply chain with consumers sensitive to both carbon emissions and delivery time. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(1), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.031
Hu, X., Yang, Z., Sun, J., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Carbon tax or cap-and-trade: Which is more viable for Chinese remanufacturing industry? Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118606
Huang, S., Fan, Z. P., & Wang, N. (2020). Green subsidy modes and pricing strategy in a capital-constrained supply chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101885
Jiang, L., Hu, X., Zhang, G., Chen, Y., Zhong, H., & Shi, P. (2022). Carbon Emission Risk and Governance. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 13, 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-022-00411-8
Kesicki, F., & Strachan, N. (2011). Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves: Confronting theory and practice. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(8), 1195–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.004
Liu, Y., & Lu, Y. (2015). The Economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: A model-based scenario analysis. Applied Energy, 141, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.032
Liu, H., Kou, X., Xu, G., Qiu, X., & Liu, H. (2021). Which emission reduction mode is the best under the carbon cap-and-trade mechanism? Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128053
Liu, M., Lin, Q., & Wang, X. (2022). Status and trends of operational decision-making of supply chain emission reduction. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Social Sciences Edition, 24(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.14071/j.1008-8105(2022)-1001
Lu, C.-J., Yang, C.-T., & Yen, H.-F. (2020). Stackelberg game approach for sustainable production-inventory model with collaborative investment in technology for reducing carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121963
Mao, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). Cooperative carbon emission reduction through the Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 10005–10026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16130-4
Mathur, A., & Morris, A. C. (2014). Distributional effects of a carbon tax in broader U.S. fiscal reform. Energy Policy, 66, 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.047
Nie, P. Y., Wang, C., & Wen, H. X. (2022). Optimal tax selection under monopoly: Emission tax vs carbon tax. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 12157–12163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16519-1
Peng, W., Lu, S., & Lu, W. (2022). Green financing for the establishment of renewable resources under carbon emission regulation. Renewable Energy, 199, 1210–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.140
Shahbaz, M., Li, J., Dong, X., & Dong, K. (2022). How financial inclusion affects the collaborative reduction of pollutant and carbon emissions: The case of China. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105847
Shuai, C., Yang, X., Zhang, Y., Shuai, C., & Ding, P. (2014). Consumer behaviour on low-carbon agri-food purchase: a carbon labelling experimental study in China. Agricultural Economics, 60(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.17221/20/2013-AGRICECON
Yang, L., Hu, Y., & Huang, L. (2020). Collecting mode selection in a remanufacturing supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(2), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.006
Zhang, Z., & Yu, L. (2021). Dynamic optimization and coordination of cooperative emission reduction in a dual-channel supply chain considering reference low-carbon effect and low-carbon goodwill. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020539
Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Chinese tourism economic change under carbon tax scenarios. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(7), 836–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2018.1551339
Zhang, W., Liu, C., Li, L., & Jiao, J. (2021). Allocation of the carbon emission abatement target in a two-echelon supply chain. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 29(9), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0268
Zhi, B., Liu, X., Chen, J., & Jia, F. (2019). Collaborative carbon emission reduction in supply chains: An evolutionary game-theoretic study. Management Decision, 57(4), 1087–1107. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-09-2018-1061
Zhou, D., An, Y., Zha, D., Wu, F., & Wang, Q. (2019). Would an increasing block carbon tax be better? A comparative study within the Stackelberg Game framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 235, 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.082
Zhou, Z., Nie, L., Ji, H., Zeng, H., & Chen, X. (2020). Does a firm’s low-carbon awareness promote low-carbon behaviors? Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118903
Zhu, W., & He, Y. (2017). Green product design in supply chains under competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(1), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.053