A comparative review of patient safety initiatives for national health information technology

International Journal of Medical Informatics - Tập 82 - Trang e139-e148 - 2013
Farah Magrabi1, Jos Aarts2, Christian Nohr3, Maureen Baker4, Stuart Harrison4, Sylvia Pelayo5, Jan Talmon6, Dean F. Sittig7, Enrico Coiera1
1Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
2Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3Danish Centre for Health Informatics, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Denmark
4Department of Health Informatics Directorate, Leeds, England, United Kingdom
5EVALAB – INSERM CIC IT, University Hospital of Lille, University of Lille Nord de France, F-59000 Lille, France
6Department Medical Informatics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
7University of Texas – Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality & Safety, School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Coiera, 2012, The dangerous decade, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 19, 2, 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000674 IOM (Institute of Medicine), 2012 Ash, 2004, Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 11, 104, 10.1197/jamia.M1471 Magrabi, 2010, An analysis of computer-related patient safety incidents to inform the development of a classification, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 17, 663, 10.1136/jamia.2009.002444 Magrabi, 2011, Patient safety problems associated with healthcare information technology: an analysis of adverse events reported to the US Food and Drug Administration, AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc., 2011, 853 Magrabi, 2012, Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 19, 45, 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000369 Sittig, 2011, Defining health information technology-related errors: new developments since to err is human, Adv. Intern. Med., 171, 1281 Weiner, 2007, “e-Iatrogenesis”: the most critical unintended consequence of CPOE and other HIT, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 14, 387, 10.1197/jamia.M2338 Hanuscak, 2009, Evaluation of causes and frequency of medication errors during information technology downtime, Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., 66, 1119, 10.2146/ajhp080389 Harrison, 2007, Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care – an interactive sociotechnical analysis, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 14, 542, 10.1197/jamia.M2384 Perry, 2005, The role of automation in complex system failures, J. Patient Saf., 1, 56, 10.1097/01209203-200503000-00010 Wetterneck, 2011, Factors contributing to an increase in duplicate medication order errors after CPOE implementation, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 18, 774, 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000255 2007 Leveson, 2011 Coiera, 2003, Interaction design theory, Int. J. Med. Inform., 69, 205, 10.1016/S1386-5056(02)00106-5 Young, 1987, Validation of medical software: present policy of the Food and Drug Administration, Ann. Intern. Med., 106, 628, 10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-628 Walker, 2008, EHR safety: the way forward to safe and effective systems, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 15, 272, 10.1197/jamia.M2618 Singh, 2011, Creating an oversight infrastructure for electronic health record-related patient safety hazards, J. Patient Saf., 7, 169, 10.1097/PTS.0b013e31823d8df0 Longhurst, 2012, Health information technology and patient safety, BMJ, 344, e1096, 10.1136/bmj.e1096 European Commission's Directorate for public health and risk assessment, available from: ec.europa.eu/health/medical-devices/regulatory-framework/ (September 2012). S.S. Jones, R. Koppel, M.S. Ridgely, T.E. Palen, S. Wu, M.I. Harrison, Guide to Reducing Unintended Consequences of Electronic Health Records (Prepared by RAND Corporation under Contract No. HHSA290200600017I, Task Order #5), AHRQ Publication No. 11-0105-EF, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, available from: http://www.ucguide.org/ (August 2011). NHS Connecting for Health: Clinical Safety, available from: http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/clinsafety (December 2011). Dansk Patient-Sikkerheds-Database, available from: http://www.dpsd.dk (September 2012). The Dutch Health Care Inspectorate, available from: http://www.igz.nl/english/ (February 2012). US Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT, available from: http://www.healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/community/healthit_hhs_gov__home/1204accessed (December 2011). US Food and Drug Administration: Draft Guidance for Mobile Medical Applications, available from: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ucm255978.htm (January 2012). Health Canada, available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/md-im/activit/announce-annonce/md_notice_software_im_avis_logicels-eng.php (December 2011). Canada Health Infoway, available from: http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/working-with-ehr/solution-providers/certification (December 2011). NEHTA – National E-Health Transition Authority: http://www.nehta.gov.au/connecting-australia/cca (December 2011). Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2012 International Organization for Standardization – Medical Devices – Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices (EN ISO 14971:2007) – Geneva, 2007. International Electrotechnical Commission – Medical Devices – Application of usability engineering to medical devices (IEC 62366:2008) – Geneva, 2007. International Electrotechnical Commission – Medical Devices – Application of risk management for IT-networks incorporating medical devices (IEC 80001:2010) – Geneva, 2010. NHS CfH Common User Interface, available from: http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/data/cui (December 2011). NHS Connecting for Health, 2010 NHS Connecting for Health, 2010 NHS Connecting for Health, Health Informatics – Application of Clinical Risk Management to the Manufacture of Health Software (Formerly ISO/TS 29321:2008(E)) – DSCN14/2009. NHS Connecting for Health, Health Informatics – Guidance on the Management of Clinical Risk Relating to the Deployment and Use of Health Software (Formerly ISO/TR 29322:2008(E)), DSCN18/2009. UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, available from: http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Howweregulate/Devices/index.htm (September 2012). NIST Technical Evaluation, Testing, and Validation of the Usability of Electronic Health Records, US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NISTIR 7804), US National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2012, available from: http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=909701. Lowry, 2012 General Principles of Software Validation, Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/comp/guidance/938.html (11.01.02). Draft Guidance for Industry: Blood Establishment Computer System Validation in the User's Facility, http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Blood/ucm072560.htm (October 2007). Guidance for the Submission of Premarket Notifications for Medical Image Management Devices, http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ (July 2007). US Certification Commission for Healthcare IT, available from: http://www.cchit.org/cchit-certified (September 2012). Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database – (MAUDE), available from: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/PostmarketRequirements/ReportingAdverseEvents/ucm127891.htm (accessed December 2011). Karsh, 2004, Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety, Qual. Saf. Health Care, 13, 388, 10.1136/qshc.2004.010322 Tullis, 2008 Chai, 2000, Medical device regulation in the United States and the European Union: a comparative study, Food Drug Law J. [Comp. Study], 55, 57 Kuyvenhoven, 2001, European Medical Device Directive: impact on nuclear medicine, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., 25, 207, 10.1016/S0895-6111(00)00050-1 Guidelines on the Qualification and Classification of Stand Alone Software Used in Healthcare Within the Regulatory Framework of Medical Devices, ec.europa.eu/health/medical-devices/documents/guidelines/index_en.htm (February 2012). Goodman, 2011, Challenges in ethics, safety, best practices, and oversight regarding HIT vendors, their customers, and patients: a report of an AMIA special task force, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 18, 77, 10.1136/jamia.2010.008946 Miller, 1997, Ann. Intern. Med., 127, 842, 10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00014 Pham, 2010, Establishing a global learning community for incident-reporting systems, Qual. Saf. Health Care, 19, 446, 10.1136/qshc.2009.037739 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Common Formats, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, available from: http://www.pso.ahrq.gov/formats/commonfmt.htm (September 2012). Walker, 2012 European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry Directorate F-Consumer Good Unit F3-Cosmetic and Medical Devices: Guidelines on a Medical Device Vigilance System, MEDDEV 2.12-1 rev 6, December 2009. Singh, 2009, Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication, BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Making, 9, 49, 10.1186/1472-6947-9-49 Medikonda, 2009, An approach to modeling software safety in safety-critical systems, J. Comp. Sci., 5, 311, 10.3844/jcssp.2009.311.322 1998 Kornecki, 2007 Storey, 1996 Marshall, 2009 Sittig, 2012, Electronic health records and national patient-safety goals, N. Engl. J. Med., 367, 1854, 10.1056/NEJMsb1205420 Sittig, 2010, Safe electronic health record use requires a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework, JAMA, 303, 450, 10.1001/jama.2010.61