A comparative evaluation of market based measures for shipping decarbonization

Antigua (2018). Action plan for implementing the IMO GHG strategy and candidate measures, submitted by Antigua and Barbuda, Kenya, Marshall Islands, Palau, Solomon Islands, Tonga, and Tuvalu. IMO doc ISWG-GHG 4/2/3. Bahamas (2010) Market-based instruments: a penalty on trade and development proposal by the Bahamas, IMO doc. MEPC 60/4/10. Denmark, (2010). The International fund for greenhouse gas emissions from ships (GHG Fund) proposed by Cyprus, Denmark, the Marshall Islands, Nigeria and IPTA, IMO doc. MEPC 60/4/8. Denmark, (2020). Detailed impact assessment of the mandatory operational goal-based short-term measure, submitted by Denmark, France and Germany, IMO doc. ISWG-GHG-7/2/20. Denmark (2021a) Proposed draft amendments to MARPOL Annex VI (establishment of the international maritime research and development board and the IMO Maritime research fund). Submitted by Denmark, Georgia, Greece, Japan, Liberia, Malta, Nigeria, Palau, Singapore, Switzerland, ICS, BIMCO, INTERTANKO, CLIA, INTERCARGO, IPTA, IMCA, INTERFERRY and WSC. IMO doc. MEPC 76/7/7. Denmark (2021b) Comprehensive Impact assessment on states (establishment of the International maritime research and development board and the IMO Maritime research fund) Submitted by Denmark, Georgia, Greece, Japan, Liberia, Malta, Nigeria, Palau, Singapore, Switzerland, ICS, BIMCO, INTERTANKO, CLIA, INTERCARGO, IPTA, IMCA, INTERFERRY and WSC. IMO doc. MEPC 76/7/8. Devanney, 2010 Devanney, J. (2011a). Direct taxation is the best way to curb CO2 emissions, Lloyds List, May 4, 2011. Devanney, (2011b). Are owners and charterers really that stupid? Center for Tankship Excellence, USA www.c4tx.org. EC (2013). Proposal from the commission to the European Parliament and Council for the inclusion of GHG emissions from maritime transport in the EU's reduction commitments impact assessment (Parts I, II). EMSA (2020). 2019 Annual report on CO2 emissions from maritime transport, European Commission report C(2020) 3184 final. EU (2015). European Parliament and the Council. Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of 29 April 2015 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and amending directive 2009/16/EC; European Parliament and the Council: Strasbourg, France, 2015. EU (2019). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “the European Green Deal” (Com/2019/640 Final). Evans, 2016, Emissions and aviation: towards greener air transport France (2010). Further elements for the development of an emissions trading system (ETS) for International shipping proposal by France, submitted by France, IMO doc. MEPC 60/4/41. France (2018). Proposal to include work on market-based measures in the programme of follow-up actions of the initial IMO GHG strategy, submitted by France, IMO doc. ISWG-GHG 4/2/11. Germany (2010). Impact Assessment of an emissions trading scheme with a particular view on developing countries, IMO doc. MEPC 60/4/54. Gkonis, 2012, Modelling tankers’ optimal speed and emissions, archival paper, SNAME Trans., 120, 90 Halim, 2019 Hermeling, 2015, Sailing into a dilemma, Transp. Res. Part A, 78, 34 Hughes, E. (2020). Implications of application of the EU emissions trading system (ETS) to international shipping, and potential benefits of alternative market-based measures (MBMs), study conducted for the international chamber of shipping and the European community shipowners associations, July. ICS (2019). Proposal to establish an international maritime research and development board (IMRB) Submitted by BIMCO, CLIA, ICS, INTERCARGO, INTERFERRY, INTERTANKO, IPTA, and WSC. IMO doc. MEPC 75/7/4. IMO (2010). Full report of the work undertaken by the expert group on feasibility study and impact assessment of possible market-based measures, IMOdoc. MEPC 61/INF.2. IMO (2018). Resolution MEPC.304 (72) (adopted on 13 April 2018), Initial IMO Strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships, IMO doc. MEPC 72/17/Add.1, Annex 11. IMO (2020). Review of impact assessments by UNCTAD, Note by the Secretariat, IMO doc. ISWG-GHG-7/2/36. IUCN (2010), A rebate mechanism (RM) for a market-based instrument for international shipping proposal by IUCN, IMO doc. MEPC 60/4/55. Jamaica (2010). Achieving reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from ships through Port State arrangements utilizing the ship traffic, energy and environment model, STEEM (PSL) proposal by Jamaica, IMO doc. MEPC 60/4/40. Japan (2010). The leveraged incentive scheme (LIS) to improve the energy efficiency of ships based on the International GHG Fund proposed by Japan, IMO doc. MEPC 60/4/37. Japan and WSC (2011). Consolidated proposal of "efficiency incentive scheme" based on the leveraged incentive scheme and the vessel efficiency system, IMO doc. GHG WG 3/3/2. Kapetanis, 2014, Estimating the operational effects of a bunker levy: the case of Handymax bulk carriers Kontovas, 2016, Transportation emissions: some basics Koesler, 2015, Course set for a cap? A case study among ship operators on a maritime ETS, Transp. Policy, 37, 20, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.009 Krammer, 2017 Lagouvardou, 2020, A literature survey on market-based measures for the decarbonization of shipping, Sustainability, 12, 3953, 10.3390/su12103953 Marshall (2020). Comments on the fourth IMO GHG study 2020 and encouraging further ambitious action to reduce GHG emissions. Submitted by the Marshall Islands and Solomon Islands, IMO doc. MEPC 75/7/17. Marshall (2021), Proposal for IMO to establish a universal mandatory greenhouse gas levy. Submitted by the Marshall Islands and Solomon Islands. Submitted by the Marshall Islands and Solomon Islands, IMO doc. MEPC 76/7/12. Norway (2010). The global emission trading system (ETS) for international shipping proposal by Norway, IMO doc. MEPC 61/4/22. NZIER (2018), MARPOL IV and VI: assessing the economic and environmental impact of international maritime measures on New Zealand. NZIER report to Ministry of transport, November. Psaraftis, 2012, Market based measures for green house gas emissions from ships: a review, WMU J. Marit. Aff., 11, 211, 10.1007/s13437-012-0030-5 Psaraftis, 2019, Speed optimization vs. speed Reduction: are speed limits better than a bunker levy?, Marit. Econ. Logist., 21, 524, 10.1057/s41278-019-00132-8 Psaraftis, 2010, Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation, Transp. Res. Part D, 15, 458, 10.1016/j.trd.2010.05.001 Psaraftis, 2019, Market based measures for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from ships: a possible way forward, Samfundsøkonomen, 4/19, 60 Psaraftis, H.N., Zis, T., and Lagouvardou, S. (2020), DMA-DTU project on market based measures (MBMs): final Report, Technical University of Denmark report, December 16. Psaraftis, 2021, Impact assessment of a mandatory operational goal-based short-term measure to reduce GHG emissions from ships: the LDC/SIDS case study, Int. Environ. Agreem. Politics Law Econ., 10.1007/s10784-020-09523-2 Rehmatulla, 2015, Barriers to energy efficient and low carbon shipping, Ocean Eng., 110, 102, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.030 Ricardo, A.E.A., Milieu, I.H.S., Amec, and Marintek, (2013). Support for the impact assessment of a proposal to address maritime transport greenhouse gas emissions, report for European commission-DG climate action. 2013. Trafigura (2020), A proposal for an IMO-led global shipping industry decarbonization programme. Report by Trafigura, October. UK (2010) Global emissions trading system (ETS) for international shipping proposal by the United Kingdom, IMO doc. MEPC 60/4/26. UK (2020) Economic incentives to reduce GHG emissions from international shipping submitted by the United Kingdom, IMO doc ISWG-GHG-7/8/1. USA (2010) The United States proposal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping, the ship efficiency and credit trading (SECT), IMO doc. MEPC 60/4/12. Wijnolst, 1995 WSC (2010) Vessel efficiency system (VES) proposal by World Shipping Council, IMO doc. MEPC 60/4/39. WSC (2020), EU ETS discussion paper, report by the World Shipping Council, September. Zis, 2017, The implications of the new sulphur limits on the European Ro-Ro sector, Transp. Res. Part D, 52, 185, 10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.010 Zis, 2019, Policy measures to avert possible modal shifts caused by sulphur regulation in the European Ro-Ro sector, Transp. Res. Part D, 70, 1, 10.1016/j.trd.2019.03.001 Zis, 2019, Operational measures to mitigate and reverse the potential modal shifts due to environmental legislation, Marit. Policy Manag., 46, 117, 10.1080/03088839.2018.1468938