A comparative analysis of different pixel and object-based classification algorithms using multi-source high spatial resolution satellite data for LULC mapping

Agrafiotis P, Georgopoulos A (2015) Comparative assessment of very high resolution satellite and aerial orthoimagery. Int Arch Photogram Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci 40(3):1

Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York

Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964:28.

Baatz M, Benz U, Dehghani S, Heynen M, Höltje A, Hofmann P, Lingenfelder I, Mimler M, Sohlbach M, Weber M, Willhauck G (2004) eCognition Professional 4.0 User Guide. Definiens Imaging GmbH. Definiens, Munich

Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M (2004) Multiresolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 58(3–4):239–258

Chen Z, Zhao Z, Gong P, Zeng B (2006) A new process for the segmentation of high resolution remote sensing imagery. Int J Remote Sens 27:4991–5001

Chi M, Feng R, Bruzzone L (2008) Classification of hyperspectral remote-sensing data with primal SVM for small-sized training dataset problem. Adv Space Res 41(11):1793–1799

Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20(1):37–46

Cleve C, Kelly M, Kearns FR, Moritz M (2008) Classification of the wildland–urban interface: a comparison of pixel-and object-based classifications using high-resolution aerial photography. Comput Environ Urb Syst 32(4):317–326

Dahiya S, Garg PK, Jat MK (2013) A comparative study of various pixel-based image fusion techniques as applied to an urban environment. Int J Image Data Fusion 4(3):197–213

De Leeuw J, Jia H, Yang L, Liu X, Schmidt K, Skidmore AK (2006) Comparing accuracy assessments to infer superiority of image classification methods. Int J Remote Sens 27:223–232

Dietterich TG (1998) Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Comput 10:1895–1923

Dingle Robertson L, King DJ (2011) Comparison of pixel- and object-based classification in land cover change mapping. Int J Remote Sens 32(6):1505–1529

Domingos P, Pazzani M (1997) On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Mac Learn 29:103–130

Durieux L, Lagabrielle E, Nelson A (2008) A method for monitoring building construction in urban sprawl areas using object-based analysis of Spot 5 images and existing GIS data. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 63(4):399–408

Duro DC, Franklin SE, Dubé MG (2012) A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery. Remote Sens Environ 118:259–272

ESRI AD (2016) Release 10.5. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA

Foody GM (2004) Thematic map comparison: evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 70:627–634

Foody GM, Mathur A (2004) Toward intelligent training of supervised image classifications: directing training data acquisition for SVM classification. Remote Sens Environ 93(1):107–117

Gao Y, Kerle N, Mas JF (2009) Object-based image analysis for coal fire-related land cover mapping in coal mining areas. Geocarto Int 24(1):25–36

Gao Y, Marpu P, Niemeyer I, Runfola DM, Giner NM, Hamill T, Pontius RG Jr (2011) Object-based classification with features extracted by a semi-automatic feature extraction algorithm–SEaTH. Geocarto Int 26(3):211–226

Ghosh A, Joshi PK (2013) Assessment of pan-sharpened very high-resolution WorldView-2 images. Int J Remote Sens 34(23):8336–8359

Gudiyangada Nachappa T, Kienberger S, Meena SR, Hölbling D, Blaschke T (2020) Comparison and validation of per-pixel and object-based approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geomat Nat Hazard Risk 11(1):572–600

Hay GJ, Marceau DJ, Dube P, Bouchard A (2001) A multiscale framework for landscape analysis: object-specific analysis and upscaling. Lands Ecol 16(6):471–490

Hayes MM, Miller SN, Murphy MA (2014) High-resolution landcover classification using Random Forest. Remote Sens Lett 5(2):112–121

Herold M, Liu X, Clarke KC (2003) Spatial metrics and image texture for mapping urban land use. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 69(9):991–1001

Hexagon Geospatial (2016) ERDAS IMAGINE 2016. Intergraph Geospatial, Huntsville

Hu X, Weng Q (2011) Impervious surface area extraction from IKONOS imagery using an object-based fuzzy method. Geocarto Int 26(1):3–20

Jadhav SD, Channe HP (2016) Comparative study of K-NN, naive bayes and decision tree classification techniques. Int J Sci Res 5(1):1842–1845

Jozdani SE, Johnson BA, Chen D (2019) Comparing deep neural networks, ensemble classifiers, and support vector machine algorithms for object-based urban land use/land cover classification. Remote Sens 11(14):1713

Karatzoglou A, Smola A, Hornik K, Zeileis A (2004) kernlab-an S4 package for kernel methods in R. J Stat Softw 11(9):1–20

Kavzoglu T (2017) Object-oriented random forest for high resolution land cover mapping using Quickbird-2 imagery. In: Handbook of neural computation, Academic Press, pp 607-619

Kelly M, Shaari D, Guo Q, Liu D (2004) A comparison of standard and hybrid classifier methods for mapping hardwood mortality in areas affected by sudden oak death. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 70(11):1229–1239

Kotsiantis SB, Zaharakis I, Pintelas P (2007) Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Emerg Artif Intell Appl Comput Eng 160(1):3–24

Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2(3):18–22

Long JA, Lawrence RL, Greenwood MC, Marshall L, Miller PR (2013) Object oriented crop classification using multitemporal ETM+ SLC-off imagery and random forest. Gisci Remote Sens 50(4):418–436

Majka M (2018) naivebayes: High Performance Implementation of the Naive Bayes Algorithm. R package version 0.9.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=naivebayes. Accessed April 2018

Manandhar R, Odeh IO, Ancev T (2009) Improving the accuracy of land use and land cover classification of Landsat data using post-classification enhancement. Remote Sens 1(3):330–344

Mountrakis G, Im J, Ogole C (2011) Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 66(3):247–259

Myint SW, Gober P, Brazel A, Grossman-Clarke S, Weng Q (2011) Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens Environ 115(5):1145–1161.

Myint SW, Mesev V, Lam NSN (2006) Texture analysis and classification through a modified lacunarity analysis based on differential box counting method. Geograph Anal 38:371–390

Nemmour H, Chibani Y (2006) Multiple support vector machines for land cover change detection: an application for mapping urban extensions. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 61(2):125–133

Otukei JR, Blaschke T (2010) Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform 12:S27–S31

Ouyang ZT, Zhang MQ, Xie X, Shen Q, Guo HQ, Zhao B (2011) A comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented approaches to VHR imagery for mapping saltmarsh plants. Ecol Inform 6(2):136–146

Padwick C, Deskevich M, Pacifici F, Smallwood S (2010) WorldView-2 pan-sharpening. In: Proceedings of the ASPRS 2010 annual conference, San Diego, CA, USA, vol 2630

Petropoulos GP, Kalaitzidis C, Vadrevu KP (2012) Support vector machines and object-based classification for obtaining land-use/cover cartography from hyperion hyperspectral imagery. Comp Geosci 41:99–107

Puissant A, Rougier S, Stumpf A (2014) Object-oriented mapping of urban trees using Random Forest classifiers. Int J Appl Earth Obser Geoinform 26:235–245

Qu LA, Chen Z, Li M, Zhi J, Wang H (2021) Accuracy improvements to pixel-based and object-based LULC classification with auxiliary datasets from Google Earth engine. Remote Sens 13(3):453

R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed September 2017

Ren J (2012) ANN vs. SVM: Which one performs better in classification of MCCs in mammogram imaging. Knowledge-Based Syst 26:144–153

Robles Granda PD (2011) A new image classification algorithm based on additive groves. Unpublished MSc Thesis. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.

Rodriguez-Galiano VF, Ghimire B, Rogan J, Chica-Olmo M, Rigol-Sanchez JP (2012) An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for landcover classification. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 67:93–104

Rozenstein O, Karnieli A (2011) Comparison of methods for land-use classification incorporating remote sensing and GIS inputs. Appl Geograp 31(2):533–544

Shao Y, Lunetta RS (2012) Comparison of support vector machine, neural network, and CART algorithms for the land-cover classification using limited training data points. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 70:78–87

Srivastava PK, Han D, Rico-Ramirez MA, Bray M, Islam T (2012) Selection of classification techniques for land use/land cover change investigation. Adv Space Res 50(9):1250–1265

Su Y, Huang PS, Lin CF, Tu TM (2004) Target-cluster fusion approach for classifying high resolution IKONOS imagery. IEEE Proc Vis Image Sig Process 151:241–249

Tassi A, Gigante D, Modica G, Di Martino L, Vizzari M (2021) Pixel-vs object-based Landsat 8 data classification in google earth engine using random forest: the case study of Maiella National Park. Remote Sens 13(12):2299.

Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebuv MN (2014) A comparative assessment between object and pixel-based classification approaches for land use/land cover mapping using SPOT 5 imagery. Geocarto Int 29(4):351–369

Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I (2012) Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and Naïve Bayes models. Math Probl Eng 2012:26. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/974638

Tu JV (1996) Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidem 49(11):1225–1231

Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-95457-0

Walter V (2004) Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 58:225–238

Wang Z, Ziou D, Armenakis C, Li D, Li Q (2005) A comparative analysis of image fusion methods. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 43(6):1391–1402

Whiteside TG, Boggs GS, Maier SW (2011) Comparing object-based and pixel based classifications for mapping savannas. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform 13(6):884–893

Wiesmann D, Quinn D (2011) Rasclass: supervised raster image classification. R package version 0.2.1. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rasclass/index.html. Accessed January 2018

Yan G, Mas JF, Maathuis BHP, Xiangmin Z, Van Dijk PM (2006) Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented image classification approaches—a case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China. Int J Remote Sens 27(18):4039–4055

Zar JH (2009) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

Zhang A (2014) Collaboration in the Australian and Chinese mobile telecommunication markets. Springer, New York