A categorical perspective towards aerodynamic models for aeroelastic analyses of bridge decks

Royal Society Open Science - Tập 6 Số 3 - Trang 181848 - 2019
Igor Kavrakov1, Dmitrii Legatiuk2, Klaus Gürlebeck2, Guido Morgenthal1
1Chair of Modelling and Simulation of Structures, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Weimar, Germany
2Chair of Applied Mathematics, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Weimar, Germany

Tóm tắt

Reliable modelling in structural engineering is crucial for the serviceability and safety of structures. A huge variety of aerodynamic models for aeroelastic analyses of bridges poses natural questions on their complexity and thus, quality. Moreover, a direct comparison of aerodynamic models is typically either not possible or senseless, as the models can be based on very different physical assumptions. Therefore, to address the question of principal comparability and complexity of models, a more abstract approach, accounting for the effect of basic physical assumptions, is necessary. This paper presents an application of a recently introduced category theory-based modelling approach to a diverse set of models from bridge aerodynamics. Initially, the categorical approach is extended to allow an adequate description of aerodynamic models. Complexity of the selected aerodynamic models is evaluated, based on which model comparability is established. Finally, the utility of the approach for model comparison and characterization is demonstrated on an illustrative example from bridge aeroelasticity. The outcome of this study is intended to serve as an alternative framework for model comparison and impact future model assessment studies of mathematical models for engineering applications.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.eng.2017.11.008

10.1016/S0022-460X(78)80028-5

10.1016/S0022-460X(78)80029-7

Davenport AG, 1962, The response of slender, line-like structures to a gusty wind, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 23, 389

10.1016/0167-6105(93)90144-D

10.1016/j.jweia.2010.01.003

10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00147-7

10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.06.004

10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.09.015

10.1098/rsta.2012.0430

10.1016/j.jweia.2012.12.005

Kavrakov I Morgenthal G. 2018 A synergistic study of a CFD and semi-analytical models for aeroelastic analysis of bridges in turbulent wind conditions. J. Fluids Struct. 82 59-85. (doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.06.013)

10.1007/s00161-014-0374-5

10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.001

10.1016/j.jweia.2017.05.007

10.1016/j.cma.2004.03.002

10.1016/j.jcp.2006.03.037

10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00005-2

10.1016/j.cma.2011.03.016

10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.009

Dutailly JC. 2014 Hilbert spaces in modelling of systems. HAL Id: hal-00974251 p. 47.

Dutailly JC. 2014 Common structures in scientific theories. HAL Id: hal-01003869 p. 34.

Nefzi B Schott R Song Y Staples G Tsiontsiou E. 2015 An operator calculus approach for multi-constrained routing in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. of the 16th ACM Int. Symp. on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing Hangzhou China 22–25 June . New York NY: ACM.

Legatiuk D Nilsson H. 2017 Abstract modelling: towards a typed declarative language for the conceptual modelling phase. In Proc. of 8th Int. Workshop on Equation-Based Object-Oriented Modeling Languages and Tools Weßling Germany 1 December . New York NY: ACM.

10.1002/mma.3978

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198568612.001.0001

Simiu E, 1996, Wind effects on structures, 3

10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000641

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:11(1193)

Blevins RD, 2001, Flow-induced vibration, 2

10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.009

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:2(279)

10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.052

10.1016/j.jweia.2010.12.011

10.1017/CBO9780511526442

10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.020

10.1016/j.jweia.2013.12.002

Prendergast J. 2007 Simulation of 2D unsteady wind by a vortex method. PhD thesis Cambridge University UK.

10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.093

10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.06.018

Arena A, 2015, Post-critical behaviour of suspension bridges under nonlinear aerodynamic loading, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 11, 011005-1

10.1016/j.jweia.2007.02.022

10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.10.003

10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00175-5

10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.12.005

10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000737

10.1016/S0266-8920(02)00005-X