A benchmarking methodology for metalcasting industry

Benchmarking - 2006
Laura M.M.Ribeiro1, J.A.Sarsfield Cabral2
1Dept. Eng. Metalúrgica e Materiais, Fac. de Engenharia da UP, GMM/IMAT, Porto, Portugal
2Dept. Eng. Mecânica e Gestão Industrial, Fac. de Engenharia da UP, Porto, Portugal

Tóm tắt

PurposeTo provide the basis for the development of a specific benchmarking methodology for the foundry industry.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology was developed with the support of the Portuguese Foundry Association (APF). The project was structured in two stages: developing the model for the performance assessment (including performance indicators specially designed for the foundry companies); and conducting a pilot benchmarking exercise in order to validate the model. Both stages received the contribution of eight relevant national foundries.FindingsProvides information about expectations of the benchmarking partners group. Make available a specific benchmarking model for assessing the foudries' performance based on critical factors. Provides foundry‐oriented indicators. Confirms that benchmarking is a time‐consuming tool, demanding continuous commitment of the top‐managers.Research limitations/implicationsA limitation of the study is the number of benchmarking partners (eight foundries). The statistical analysis of the results based on this small sample was not practicable, preventing the definition of the presumed causal relations between improvement practices and performance outcomes.Practical implicationsThe benchmarking model is now available at the APF. From now on, this institution can provide its members with a tool for promoting the co‐operation among companies and to enhance and enlarge significantly the available information about this sector. This activity will, certainly, help to improve organisations' performance, upgrading the competitiveness of the metalcasting industry in Portugal.Originality/valueThis paper helps the development of benchmarking in the metalcasting industry in which the number of published studies is very limited.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson, B., Browne, J., Devlin, J. and Rolstadås, A. (1997), “Performance measurement: the ENAPS approach”, The International Journal of Business Transformation, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 73‐84.

Andersen, B. and Jordan, P. (1998), “Setting up a performance benchmarking network”, Production Planning & Control, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 13‐19.

Bemowski, K. (1991), “The benchmarking bandwagon”, Quality Progress, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 19‐24.

Camp, R.C. (1989), Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.

Carpinetti, L.R. and Melo, A.M. (2002), “What to benchmark? A systematic approach and cases”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 244‐55.

Codling, S. (1998), Benchmarking, Gower, Aldershot.

Creese, R.C., Atluri, R. and Rammohan, N.C. (1998), “Metalcasting benchmarking”, Cost Engineering, Vol. 40 No. 12, pp. 35‐42.

Czuchry, A.J., Yasin, M.M. and Dorsh, J.J. (1995), “A review of benchmarking literature: a proposed model for implementation”, Introduction Journal of Materials & Product Tecnology, Vol. 10 Nos 1/2, pp. 27‐45.

Flapper, S., Fortuin, L. and Stoop, P. (1996), “Towards consistent performance management systems”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 16 No. 7, pp. 27‐37.

Jarrar, Y.F. and Zairi, M. (2000), “Best practice transfer for future competitiveness: a study of best practices”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 11 Nos 4/5 & 6, pp. S734‐40.

Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Karlöf, B. and Östblom, S. (1993), Benchmarking: A Signpost to Excellence in Quality and Productivity, Wiley, Chichester.

Spendolini, M.J. (1992), The Benchmarking Book, AMACOM, New York, NY.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Benchmarking

Thông tin tác giả