A Tale of Two Reds
Tóm tắt
The question regarding how to characterize aesthetics has been revived with the publication of Bence Nanay’s Aesthetics as Philosophy of Perception. This paper takes seriously Dustin Stokes’ criticisms of Nanay’s book regarding Nanay’s inability to distinguish between ordinary expert visual tasks (e.g., sorting for sock color or ornithology) and aesthetic experience. Using empirical research on gist perception and its reliance on low-level features in visual experience, I develop a theory that distinguishes expert visual tasks and aesthetic experiences by differentiating two different kinds of distributed attention over properties. I argue that expert visual tasks are instances of property attribution in a mode of conscious attention, while aesthetics is a kind of distributed attention that significantly relies on the reiteration of gist-like lowlevel features. Gist, often referred to in visual science as “preattentive” mode, gives us a model to understand the perceptual processes that are specific to aesthetics. This comports with our common-sense definition of aesthetics as both distinguishable from ordinary expert visual tasks and an experience that makes prominent sensory aspects of visual experience.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M., et al. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 449–454.
Bayne, T. (2016). Gist! Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 116, 107–126.
Bresnahan, A. (2017). Dance appreciation: The view from the audience. In D. Goldblatt, L. Brown, & S. Patridge (Eds.), Aesthetics: A reader in the philosophy of the arts (4th ed., pp. 347–350). New York: Routledge.
Buswell, G. T. (1935). How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology and perception in art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chariker, L., Shapley, R., & Young, L.-S. (2016). Orientation selectivity from very sparse LGN inputs in a comprehensive model of macaque V1 cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(49), 12368–12384.
Clark, A. (2015). Surfing uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dretske, F. (2015). Perception versus conception: The goldilocks test. In A. Demetriou & J. Zeimbekis (Eds.), The cognitive penetrability of perception: New philosophical perspectives (Vol. 15, pp. 163–173). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392(6676), 598–601.
Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. (2009). Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 137–176.
Herzog, M. H., Thunell, E., & Ögmen, H. (2015). Putting low-level vision into global context: Why vision cannot be reduced to basic circuits. Vision Research, 126, 9–18.
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10–12), 1489–1506.
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3), 194–203.
Itti, L., Koch, C., & Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(11), 1254–1259.
Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1987). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. In L. M. Vaina (Ed.), Matters of intelligence: Conceptual structures in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 115–141). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lian, Y., et al. (2019). Towards a biologically plausible model of LGN-V1 pathways based on efficient coding. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 13, 13–24.
Locher, P. J. (2015). The aesthetic experience with visual art ‘at first glance’. In P. Bundgaard & F. Sternfelt (Eds.), Investigations into the phenomenology and the ontology of the work of art (pp. 75–88). Dordrecht: Springer, Cham.
Nanay, B. (2016). Aesthetics as philosophy of perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nodine, C. F., Locher, P. J., & Krupinski, E. A. (1993). The role of formal art training on perception and aesthetic judgment of art compositions. Leonardo, 26(3), 219–227.
Oliva, A. (2005). Gist of the scene. Neurobiology of Attention. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012375731-9/50045-8.
Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2006). Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research, 155, 23–36.
Olshausen, B. A., Anderson, C. H., & Van Essen, D. C. (1993). A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. Journal of Neuroscience, 13(11), 4700–4719.
Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42(1), 107–123.
Peacocke, C. (2008). Sensational properties: Theses to accept and theses to reject. Revue internationale de philosophie, 1, 7–24.
Pihko, E., Virtanen, A., Saarinen, V. M., Pannasch, S., Hirvenkari, L., Tossavainen, T., et al. (2011). Experiencing art: The influence of expertise and painting abstraction level. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 94.
Prinz, J. (2013). Attention, atomism, and the disunity of consciousness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86(1), 215–222.
Schnieder, B. (2006). Attributing properties. American Philosophical Quarterly, 43(4), 315–328.
Schwabe, K., Menzel, C., Mullin, C., Wagemans, J., & Redies, C. (2018). Gist perception of image composition in abstract artworks. Perception, 9(3), 1–25.
Sibley, F. (1959). Aesthetic concepts. The Philosophical Review, 68(4), 421–450.
Siegel, S. (2006). Which properties are represented in perception. Perceptual experience, 1, 481–503.
Srinivasan, P., Srinivasan, N., Lohani, M., & Baijal, S. (2009). Focused and distributed attention. Progress in Brain Research, 176, 87–100.
Stokes, D. (2016). Aesthetics as philosophy of perception. Review of Aesthetics as Philosophy of Perception, by Bence Nanay. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2016.08.10. Retrieved December 29, 2018 from https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/aesthetics-as-philosophy-of-perception/.
Tatler, B. W., Baddeley, R. J., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2005). Visual correlates of fixation selection: Effects of scale and time. Vision Research, 45(5), 643–659.
Wollheim, R. (1980). Art and objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements during perception of complex objects. In A. L. Yarbus (Ed.), Eye movements and vision (pp. 171–211). Boston, MA: Springer.
Young, L. S., Tao, L., Shelley, M., Shapley, R., Rangan, A., & McLaughlin, D. W. (2019). The evolution of large-scale modeling of monkey primary visual cortex, V1: Steps towards understanding cortical function. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 17(5), 1387–1406.
Zangemeister, W. H., Sherman, K., & Stark, L. (1995). Evidence for a global scanpath strategy in viewing abstract compared with realistic images. Neuropsychologia, 33(8), 1009–1025.