A Systems Model of Dyadic Nonverbal Interaction

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 43 - Trang 111-132 - 2019
Miles L. Patterson1
1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, USA

Tóm tắt

This article discusses a new systems model of dyadic nonverbal interaction. The model builds on earlier theories by integrating partners’ parallel sending and receiving nonverbal processes into a broader, dynamic ecological system. It does so in two ways. First, it moves the level of description beyond the individual level to the coordination of both partners’ contributions to the interaction. Second, it recognizes that the relationships between (a) individuals’ characteristics and processes and (b) the social ecology of the interaction setting are reciprocal and best analyzed at the systems level. Thus, the systems model attempts to describe and explain the dynamic interplay among individual, dyadic, and environmental processes in nonverbal interactions. The potential utility and the limitations of the systems model are discussed and the implications for future research considered. Although the systems model is focused explicitly on face-to-face nonverbal communication, it has considerable relevance for digital communication. Specifically, this model provides a useful framework for examining the social effects of mobile device use and as a template for studying human–robot interactions.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 201–271). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274. Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289–304. Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3–51). New York: Guilford. Bargh, J. A. (1990). Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of thought and behavior. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 93–130). New York: Guilford. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (pp. 1–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trotschel, R. (2001). The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements. Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403. Berger, C. B. (1997). Planning strategic interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Bilton, N. (2013). Disruptions: More connected, yet more alone. The New York Times. Retrieved September 22, 2013, from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/disruptions-more-connected-yet-more-alone/?_r=1. Breazeal, C. (2003). Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 119–155. Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217. Bugeja, M. (2005). Interpersonal divide: The search for community in a technological age. New York: Oxford University Press. Burgoon, J. K. (1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research, 4, 129–142. Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press. Cappella, J. N., & Greene, J. O. (1982). A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant-adult interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 89–114. Carney, D. A., Colvin, C. A., & Hall, J. A. (2007). A thin slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1054–1072. Chartrand, T. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910. Cloutier, J., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Who or what are you? Facial orientation and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1298–1309. Corrales, J., Gomez, G., Torres, F., & Perdereau, V. (2012). Cooperative tasks between humans and robots in industrial environments. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 9, 1–10. Crivelli, C., & Fridlund, A. J. (2018). Facial displays are tools for social influence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 388–399. Dautenhahn, K. (2002). Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robots. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 192–197). De Sola Gutierrez, J., De Fonseca, F. R., & Rubio, G. (2016). Cell phone addiction: A review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, 175. Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 1–40). San Diego: Academic Press. Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. D. T. Power (Ed.), The handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). Sussex: Wiley. Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from daguerreotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 877–889. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1995). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego: Academic Press. Fridlund, A. J. (2017). The behavioral ecology view of facial expressions, 25 years later. In J. M. Fernandez-Dols & J. A. Russell (Eds.), The science of facial expressions (pp. 77–92). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gilbert, D. T., & Krull, D. S. (1988). Seeing less and knowing more: The benefits of perceptual ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 193–202. Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press. Goodrich, M., & Schultz, A. (2007). Human-robot interaction: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 203–275. Gosling, S. D., Gaddis, S., & Vazire, S. (2008). First impressions based on the environments we create and inhabit. In N. Ambady & J. J. Skowronski (Eds.), First impressions (pp. 334–356). New York: Guilford. Hall, J. A., & Knapp, M. L. (Eds.). (2013). Nonverbal communication. Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton. Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2003). Facing prejudice: Implicit prejudice and the perception of facial threat. Psychological Science, 14, 640–643. James, W. (1983). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1890). Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 220–266). New York: Academic Press. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–238). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Knowles, E. S. (1983). Social physics and the effects of others: Tests of the effects of audience size and distance on social judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1263–1279. Lakin, J. L. (2006). Automatic cognitive processes and nonverbal communication. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 59–77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Lakin, J. L. (2013). Behavioral mimicry and interpersonal synchrony. In J. A. Hall & M. L. Knapp (Eds.), Nonverbal communication (pp. 539–575). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Lederman, T., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Analyzing dyadic data with multilevel modeling versus structural equation modeling: A tale of two methods. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 442–452. Leung, L., & Liang, J. (2015). Mobile phone addiction. In Z. Yan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mobile phone behavior (pp. 640–647). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishers. Liljenquist, K. A., Zhong, C.-B., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21(381–383), 21. Lloyd, D. M., Coates, A., Knopp, J., Oram, S., & Rowbotham, S. (2009). Don’t stand so close to me: The effect of auditory input on interpersonal space. Perception, 38, 617–620. Loersch, C., & Payne, B. K. (2011). The situated inference model: An integrative account of the effects of primes on perception, behavior, and motivation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 234–252. Manusov, V., & Patterson, M. L. (Eds.). (2006). The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Marquardt, G., Cross, E. S., de Sousa, A. A., Edelstein, E., Farne, A., Leszczynski, M., et al. (2015). There or not there? A multidisciplinary review and research agenda on the impact of transparent barriers on human perception, action, and social behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0138. Matsumoto, D., Hwang, H. C., & Frank, M. G. (Eds.). (2016). APA handbook of nonverbal communication. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Mavridis, N. (2014). A review of verbal and non-verbal human-robot interactive communication. Robotics and Autonomous System, 63, 22–35. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215–238. Oishi, S., & Graham, J. (2010). Social ecology: Lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 356–377. Park, S., Patterson, M. L., & Hwang, Y. (2015). Toward a systems model of human-robot interaction. Unpublished manuscript. Patterson, M. L. (1973). Compensation in nonverbal immediacy behaviors: A review. Sociometry, 36, 237–252. Patterson, M. L. (1976). An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy. Psychological Review, 83, 237–252. Patterson, M. L. (1982). A sequential functional model of nonverbal exchange. Psychological Review, 89, 231–249. Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer. Patterson, M. L. (1995). A parallel process model of nonverbal communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 3–29. Patterson, M. L. (2001). Toward a comprehensive model of nonverbal communication. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 159–176). Chichester: Wiley. Patterson, M. L. (2006). The evolution of theories of nonverbal interaction. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 21–39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Patterson, M. L. (2008). Back to social behavior: Mining the mundane. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 93–101. Patterson, M. L. (2011). More than words: The power of nonverbal communication. Barcelona: Editorial Aresta. Patterson, M. L. (2013). Toward a systems approach to nonverbal interaction. In J. A. Hall & M. L. Knapp (Eds.), Nonverbal communication (pp. 515–538). Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton. Patterson, M. L. (2014). Reflections on historical trends and prospects in contemporary nonverbal research. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38, 171–180. Patterson, M. L., Lammers, V. M., & Tubbs, M. E. (2014). Busy signal: Effects of mobile device usage on pedestrian encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38, 313–324. Patterson, M. L., & Quadflieg, S. (2016). The physical environment and nonverbal communication. In D. Matsumoto, H. C. Hwang, & M. G. Frank (Eds.), APA handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 189–220). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Patterson, M. L., & Ritts, V. (1997). Social and communicative anxiety: A review and meta-analysis. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 20 (pp. 262–303). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Patterson, M. L., Webb, A., & Schwartz, W. (2002). Passing encounters: Patterns of recognition and avoidance in pedestrians. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 57–66. Re, D. E., & Rule, N. O. (2016). Appearance and physiognomy. In D. Matsumoto, H. C. Hwang, & M. G. Frank (Eds.), APA handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 221–256). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399. Shanahan, M. J., Hill, P. L., Roberts, B. W., Eccles, J., & Friedman, H. S. (2014). Conscientiousness, health, and aging: The life course of personality model. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1407–1425. Stokols, D. (2018). Social ecology in the digital age: Solving complex problems in a globalized world. London: Academic Press. Webb, E., Campbell, D., Schwartz, R., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally. Weir, K. (2018). The dawn of social robots. Monitor on Psychology, 49, 50–56. Wicker, A. W. (1979). An introduction to ecological psychology. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Zebrowitz, L. A. (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul?. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.