Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Tìm Kiếm Hệ Thống và Đánh Giá Các Bảng Câu Hỏi Đo Lường Các Yếu Tố Tâm Lý Xã Hội Cá Nhân Dự Đoán Quá Trình Trở Lại Làm Việc Sau Các Rối Loạn Cơ Xương Khớp và Rối Loạn Tâm Thần Thông Thường
Tóm tắt
Mục đích: Các yếu tố tâm lý xã hội cá nhân đóng vai trò quan trọng trong quá trình trở lại làm việc (RTW) của những người lao động mắc các rối loạn cơ xương khớp (MSDs) và các rối loạn tâm thần thông thường (CMDs). Tuy nhiên, chất lượng và độ tin cậy của các bảng câu hỏi được sử dụng để đo lường các yếu tố này hiếm khi được nghiên cứu. Nghiên cứu hệ thống và tổng quan tài liệu hiện tại nhằm mục đích xác định, phân loại và đánh giá các bảng câu hỏi (công cụ đo lường) được sử dụng để đo các yếu tố tâm lý xã hội cá nhân liên quan đến nhận thức về tình trạng cá nhân và động lực trở lại làm việc, những yếu tố này dự đoán sự thành công trong quá trình trở lại làm việc của những người lao động mắc MSDs hoặc CMDs. Phương pháp: Thông qua việc tìm kiếm hệ thống trên các cơ sở dữ liệu thư viện PubMed, Web of Science và PsycINFO cùng với tài liệu xám, chúng tôi đã xác định các yếu tố tâm lý xã hội cá nhân dự đoán thành công trong quá trình trở lại làm việc của những người lao động này. Sau đó, chúng tôi thu thập các bảng câu hỏi được sử dụng để đo lường các yếu tố này. Cuối cùng, chúng tôi tìm kiếm các bài viết nhằm xác thực các bảng câu hỏi này để mô tả chúng một cách đầy đủ từ góc độ tâm lý đo lường và thực tiễn. Kết quả: Tổng quan này bao gồm 76 nghiên cứu từ 2263 bài viết ban đầu. Ba yếu tố dự đoán quan trọng về RTW sau khi mắc MSDs và CMDs đã xuất hiện (tức là, kỳ vọng trở lại làm việc, tự tin trở lại làm việc và khả năng làm việc), hai yếu tố dự đoán quan trọng về RTW chỉ sau khi mắc MSDs (tức là, sự tham gia vào công việc và sự cho rằng cá nhân cảm nhận mối liên hệ giữa sức khỏe và công việc), và hai yếu tố dự đoán quan trọng về RTW chỉ sau khi mắc CMDs (tức là, sự lạc quan và sự bi quan). Chúng tôi đã phân tích 30 bảng câu hỏi, bao gồm tám thang đo nhiều mục và 22 thang đo đơn mục. Dựa trên các thuộc tính tâm lý đo lường và thực tiễn của chúng, chúng tôi đánh giá một trong tám thang đo nhiều mục là đáng nghi ngờ và năm thang đo khác là xuất sắc. Kết luận: Với một vài ngoại lệ (tức là, sự tự tin), các công cụ được sử dụng để đo lường các yếu tố tâm lý xã hội cá nhân cho thấy có không gian cải thiện từ vừa đến đáng kể.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–858.
OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2010.
Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:171–8.
Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: TSO (The Stationery Office); 2006.
Costa-Black KM, Feuerstein M, Loisel P. Work disability models: past and present. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of work disability. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. p. 71–93.
Steenstra IA, Munhall C, Irvin E, Oranye N, Passmore S, Van Eerd D, et al. Systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work in workers with sub acute and chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27:369–81.
Gragnano A, Negrini A, Miglioretti M, Corbière M. Common psychosocial factors predicting return to work after common mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers: a review of reviews supporting a cross-disease approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28:215–31.
Loisel P, Anema JR. Handbook of work disability. New York: Springer; 2013.
Main CJ, Shaw WS. Conceptual, methodological, and measurement challenges in addressing return to work in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel R, editors. Handbook of return to work: from research to practice. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 423–38.
Villotti P, Gragnano A, Larivière C, Negrini A, Dionne CE, Corbière M. Tools appraisal of organizational factors associated with return-to-work in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal and common mental disorders: a systematic search and review. J Occup Rehabil. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09902-1.
Slavin RE. Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:9–18.
Corbiere M, Fraccaroli F. La conception, la validation, la traduction et l’adaptation transculturelle d’outils de mesure : Exemples dans le domaine de la santé mentale Conception, validation and transcultural adaptation for measurement tools: examples in the mental health field. In: Corbière M, Larivière N, editors. Méthodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la santé. 2nd ed. Quebec: Presses de l’Université du Québec (PUQ); 2020. p. 781–841.
Gross DP, Battié MC. Work-related recovery expectations and the prognosis of chronic low back pain within a workers’ compensation setting. J Occup Environ Med. 2005a;47:428–33.
Gross DP, Battié MC. Recovery expectations predict recovery in workers with back pain but not other musculoskeletal conditions. J Spinal Disord Technol. 2010;23:451–6.
Gross DP, Battié MC. Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2005b;15:285–94.
Carriere JS, Thibault P, Sullivan MJL. The mediating role of recovery expectancies on the relation between depression and return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:348–56.
Dionne CE, Bourbonnais R, Fremont P, Rossignol M, Stock SR, Larocque I. A clinical return-to-work rule for patients with back pain. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;172:1559–67.
Opsahl J, Eriksen HR, Tveito TH. Do expectancies of return to work and job satisfaction predict actual return to work in workers with long lasting LBP? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:481.
Nielsen MBD, Madsen IEH, Bultmann U, Christensen U, Diderichsen F, Rugulies R. Predictors of return to work in employees sick-listed with mental health problems: findings from a longitudinal study. Eur J Public Health. 2011;21:806–11.
Heymans MW, de Vet HCW, Knol DL, Bongers PM, Koes BW, van Mechelen W. Workers’ beliefs and expectations affect return to work over 12 months. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:685–95.
Heijbel B, Josephson M, Jensen I, Stark S, Vingård E. Return to work expectation predicts work in chronic musculoskeletal and behavioral health disorders: prospective study with clinical implications. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:173–84.
Lindell O, Johansson S-E, Strender L-E. Predictors of stable return-to-work in non-acute, non-specific spinal pain: low total prior sick-listing, high self prediction and young age. A two-year prospective cohort study. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:53.
Aasdahl L, Pape K, Jensen C, Vasseljen O, Braathen T, Johnsen R, et al. Associations between the Readiness for Return to Work Scale and return to work: a prospective study. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28:97–106.
Richter J, Blatter B, Heinrich J, de Vroome E, Anema J. Prognostic factors for disability claim duration due to musculoskeletal symptoms among self-employed persons. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:945.
Sampere M, Gimeno D, Serra C, Plana M, López JC, Martínez JM, et al. Return to work expectations of workers on long-term non-work-related sick leave. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:15–26.
Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JH, de Boer AG, Blonk RW, van Dijk FJ. Predicting the duration of sickness absence for patients with common mental disorders in occupational health care. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:67–74.
Steenstra IA, Koopman FS, Knol DL, Kat E, Bongers PM, de Vet HCW, et al. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave due to low-back pain in dutch health care professionals. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:591–605.
Turner JA, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Sheppard L, Wickizer TM, Wu R, et al. Worker recovery expectations and fear-avoidance predict work disability in a population-based workers’ compensation back pain sample. Spine. 2006;31:682–9.
Turner JA, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Sheppard L, Wickizer TM, Wu R, et al. Early predictors of chronic work disability associated with carpal tunnel syndrome: a longitudinal workers’ compensation cohort study. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50:489–500.
Du Bois M, Szpalski M, Donceel P. Patients at risk for long-term sick leave because of low back pain. Spine J. 2009;9:350–9.
Du Bois M, Donceel P. A screening questionnaire to predict no return to work within 3 months for low back pain claimants. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:380–5.
Wåhlin C, Ekberg K, Persson J, Bernfort L, Oberg B. Association between clinical and work-related interventions and return-to-work for patients with musculoskeletal or mental disorders. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:355–62.
Reiso H, Nygård JF, Jørgensen GS, Holanger R, Soldal D, Bruusgaard D. Back to work: predictors of return to work among patients with back disorders certified as sick. Spine. 2003;28:1468–73.
Reme SE, Hagen EM, Eriksen HR. Expectations, perceptions, and physiotherapy predict prolonged sick leave in subacute low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:139.
Løvvik C, Shaw W, Øverland S, Reme SE. Expectations and illness perceptions as predictors of benefit recipiency among workers with common mental disorders: secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2014;4:1–9.
Richard S, Dionne CE, Nouwen A. Self-efficacy and health locus of control: relationship to occupational disability among workers with back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:421–30.
Dionne CE, Bourbonnais R, Frémont P, Rossignol M, Stock SR, Nouwen A, et al. Determinants of “return to work in good health” among workers with back pain who consult in primary care settings: a 2-year prospective study. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:641–55.
Brouwer S, Amick BC, Lee H, Franche R-L, Hogg-Johnson S. The predictive validity of the Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy Scale for return-to-work outcomes in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:725–32.
Brouwer S, Franche R-L, Hogg-Johnson S, Lee H, Krause N, Shaw WS. Return-to-work self-efficacy: development and validation of a scale in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:244–58.
Lagerveld SE, Blonk RWB, Brenninkmeijer V, Schaufeli WB. Return to work among employees with mental health problems: development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire. Work Stress. 2010;24:359–75.
Lagerveld SE, Brenninkmeijer V, Blonk RWBB, Twisk J, Schaufeli WB. Predictive value of work-related self-efficacy change on RTW for employees with common mental disorders. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74:381–3.
Nieuwenhuijsen K, Noordik E, van Dijk FJH, van der Klink JJ. Return to work perceptions and actual return to work in workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:290–9.
Volker D, Zijlstra-Vlasveld MC, Brouwers EPM, van Lomwel AGC, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM. return-to-work self-efficacy and actual return to work among long-term sick-listed employees. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:423–31.
Huijs JJJM, Koppes LLJ, Taris TW, Blonk RWB. Differences in predictors of return to work among long-term sick-listed employees with different self-reported reasons for sick leave. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:301–11.
Huijs JJJM, Koppes LLJ, Taris TW, Blonk RWB. Work characteristics and return to work in long-term sick-listed employees with depressive symptoms. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27:612–22.
Shaw WS, Reme SE, Linton SJ, Huang Y-H, Pransky G. 3rd place, PREMUS best paper competition: development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire—psychometric properties and predictive validity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37:109–19.
Corbière M, Negrini A, Durand M-J, St-Arnaud L, Briand C, Fassier J-B, et al. Development of the Return-to-Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale (ROSES) and validation with workers suffering from a common mental disorder or musculoskeletal disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27:329–41.
Haldorsen EMH, Kronholm K, Skouen JS, Ursin H. Predictors for outcome of a multi-modal cognitive behavioural treatment program for low back pain patients—a 12-month follow-up study. Eur J Pain. 1998;2:293–307.
Hagen EM, Svensen E, Eriksen HR. Predictors and modifiers of treatment effect influencing sick leave in subacute low back pain patients. Spine. 2005;30:2717–23.
Ilmarinen J. The Work Ability Index (WAI). Occup Med. 2007;57:160–160.
Radkiewicz P, Widerszal-Bazyl M. Psychometric properties of Work Ability Index in the light of comparative survey study. Int Congr Ser. 2005;1280:304–9.
Netterstrøm B, Eller NH, Borritz M. Prognostic factors of returning to work after sick leave due to work-related common mental disorders: a one- and three-year follow-up study. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–7.
Kuijer PPFM, Gouttebarge V, Wind H, van Duivenbooden C, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. Prognostic value of self-reported work ability and performance-based lifting tests for sustainable return to work among construction workers. Scand J Work Environ Heal. 2012;38:600–3.
van der Giezen AM, Bouter LM, Nijhuis FJN. Prediction of return-to-work of low back pain patients sicklisted for 3–4 months. Pain. 2000;87:285–94.
Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L. The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health—a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Heal. 2010;36:404–12.
Kerr NL. HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2:196–217.
Wanous JP, Hudy MJ. Single-Item reliability: a replication and extension. Organ Res Methods. 2001;4:361–75.
Zijlmans EAO, van der Ark LA, Tijmstra J, Sijtsma K. Methods for estimating item-score reliability. Appl Psychol Meas. 2018;42:553–70.
Young AE, Besen E, Choi YS. The importance, measurement and practical implications of worker’s expectations for return to work. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1808–16.
Lederer V, Loisel P, Rivard M, Champagne F. Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of work (dis)ability: a scoping review of published definitions. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:242–67.
Haldorsen EMH, Indahl A, Ursin H. Patients with low back pain not returning to work—a 12-month follow-up study. Spine. 1998;23:1202–7.
Biering K, Hjollund NH, Lund T. Methods in measuring return to work: a comparison of measures of return to work following treatment of coronary heart disease. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:400–5.
Wasiak R, Young AE, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, van Poppel MNM, Anema JR. Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:766–81.
Detaille SI, Heerkens YF, Engels JA, van der Gulden JW, van Dijk FJ. Common prognostic factors of work disability among employees with a chronic somatic disease: a systematic review of cohort studies. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35:261–81.
Truchon M, Schmouth MÈ, Côté D, Fillion L, Rossignol M, Durand MJ. Absenteeism screening questionnaire (ASQ): a new tool for predicting long-term absenteeism among workers with low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:27–50.
Steenstra IA, Lee H, de Vroome EMM, Busse JW, Hogg-Johnson SJ. Comparing current definitions of return to work: a measurement approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:394–400.
Anema JR, Schellart AJM, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, van der Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:419–26.
Jensen AGC. A two-year follow-up on a program theory of return to work intervention. Work. 2013;44:165–75.
Ekberg K, Wahlin C, Persson J, Bernfort L, Oberg B. Early and late return to work after sick leave: predictors in a cohort of sick-listed individuals with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:627–37.
Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Bültmann U, van der Klink JJL, Groothoff JW. A prospective study of return to work across health conditions: perceived work attitude, self-efficacy and perceived social support. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:104–12.
Kronström K, Karlsson H, Nabi H, Oksanen T, Salo P, Sjösten N, et al. Optimism and pessimism as predictors of work disability with a diagnosis of depression: a prospective cohort study of onset and recovery. J Affect Disord. 2011;130:294–9.
Gross DP, Battié MC. Factors influencing results of functional capacity evaluations in workers’ compensation claimants with low back pain. Phys Ther. 2005c;85:315–22.