A Systematic Review of Agreement Between Perceived and Objective Neighborhood Environment Measures and Associations With Physical Activity Outcomes

Environment and Behavior - Tập 49 Số 8 - Trang 904-932 - 2017
Stephanie L. Orstad1, Meghan H. McDonough2, Shauna Stapleton1, Ceren Altincekic3, Philip J. Troped4
1Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA
2University of Calgary, calgary, Alberta, canada
3Prism Economics and Analysis, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA

Tóm tắt

A number of review studies document associations between the perceived and objectively measured neighborhood environment and physical activity. However, current evidence does not discern whether perceived or objective variables more consistently predict physical activity. A review is needed to examine the comparability of these variables and the consistency of their respective associations with the same physical activity outcome. We systematically searched three databases for studies that examined agreement between perceived and objective measures and/or associations between comparable variables and physical activity. We abstracted 85 relevant peer-reviewed studies published between 1990 and 2015, synthesized agreement coefficients, and compared these variables’ associations with physical activity. Perceived neighborhood environment variables were significantly associated with physical activity ( p < .05) at slightly higher rates than objective neighborhood environment variables (20.1% and 13.7%). Comparably defined variables exhibited low agreement and only 8.2% were associated with the same outcome. The perceived neighborhood environment and objectively measured neighborhood environment are related but distinct constructs that account for unique variance in physical activity.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.5993/AJHB.31.4.4

10.1123/jpah.6.s1.s113

10.1249/MSS.0b013e31822a9289

10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.12.007.

10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.001

10.1037/0003-066X.33.4.344

10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1

10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.021

10.1123/jpah.3.1.22

10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.03.008

10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005

10.1007/s11116-005-7027-2

10.1007/s11524-011-9652-8

10.1136/bjsports-2013-093101.

10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.014

10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.11.002

10.1249/01.mss.0000227639.83607.4d

10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.07.011

10.1037/h0026256

10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB

10.1038/ijo.2010.57

10.3390/ijerph9010294

10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7_3

10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.07.001

10.1186/1476-072X-11-43

10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.021

10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.036

Dishman R. K., 1985, Public Health Reports, 100, 158

10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.06.017

10.1007/s11524-010-9488-7

10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.009

10.1186/1479-5868-9-146

10.1080/13574800802451155

10.2105/ajph.2012.300740

10.2466/pr0.1993.73.2.403

10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.05.003

10.1177/0013916512465176

10.1093/geronb/gbr134

10.1007/s12160-009-9098-3

10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.008

Gifford R., 2007, Environmental psychology: Principles and practice, 4

10.1097/00003677-200510000-00005

10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.019.

10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.009

10.1093/her/cyq019

10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0

10.1080/01944360608976724

10.3390/ijerph121013350

10.1007/s12160-013-9572-9

10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27

10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s55

10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.023

10.1123/jpah.10.8.1109

10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00426-3.

10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.10.012

10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00434-8

10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.11.007

10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.09.014

10.1249/01.mss.0000210208.63565.73

10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.017

10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00470-1.

10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00021-7

10.1007/s12199-009-0081-1

10.1007/s11524-014-9928-x

10.1186/1479-5868-3-9

10.1186/1479-5868-6-53

10.2307/2529310

10.3390/ijerph111212594

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.11.002

10.1007/s12529-014-9400-z

10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.11.002

10.1016/j.jth.2015.03.002

10.1186/1471-2458-13-454

10.1186/1479-5868-5-26

10.1123/jpah.7.3.323

10.1123/jpah.2011-0443

10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.011

10.1186/1479-5868-8-72

10.4278/ajhp.100715-QUAN-241

10.1177/0013916507300560

10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.07.002

10.1007/s11524-006-9136-4

10.1123/jpah.5.1.117

10.1177/109019818801500401

10.1123/japa.14.3.302

10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.11.019

10.1007/s11524-008-9259-x

10.1123/JAPA.2012-0189

10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.013

10.4137/EHI.S1048

10.1123/jpah.7.4.432

10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006

10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.020

10.1136/bmjopen-2015–007593

10.1136/jech.2005.042697

10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.07.012

10.1186/1479-5868-6-70

10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.013

10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.04.020

10.1007/s10900-010-9355-1

10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.028

10.1002/jcop.20298

10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552

10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00076-2

10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100

10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.014

*Sallis J. F., 1990, Public Health Reports, 105, 179

10.1123/jpah.2012-0224

10.1007/s11524-007-9179-1

10.1007/s11764-015-0447-x

10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00014-6

10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.6

10.1093/abm/16.3.199

10.1186/1479-5868-9-40

10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.015

10.1007/s11524-014-9932-1

10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.371

10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.047

10.1007/s11764-015-0462-y

10.1006/pmed.2000.0788

10.5993/AJHB.39.2.11

10.4278/ajhp.120316-QUAN-146

10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.07.001

10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181cd5dfd

10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.041

10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00370.x

10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.02.005

10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00122-1

10.1186/1479-5868-9-6