A Structured Approach for Developing Indices of Biotic Integrity: Three Examples from Streams and Rivers in the Western USA
Tóm tắt
In the late 1990s the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency developed a structured set of tests to evaluate and facilitate selection of metrics for indices of biotic integrity (IBIs). These IBIs were designed to be applicable across multistate regions as part of a national assessment of all U.S. waters. Here, we present additional steps in, and refinements to, that IBI development process. We used fish and amphibian assemblage data from 932 stream and river sites in 12 western U.S. states to develop IBIs for Mountains, Xeric, and Plains ecoregions. We divided 237 candidate metrics into nine metric classes representing different attributes of assemblage structure and function. For each ecoregion we sequentially eliminated metrics by testing metric range, signal‐to‐noise ratios, responsiveness to disturbance, and redundancy to select the best metric in each class. The IBIs for the Mountains and Plains each had seven metrics and the Xeric IBI had five. In the Mountains, half of the estimated stream length that could be assessed had IBI scores greater than 62 (out of 100). In the Xeric and Plains, half the stream length had scores no greater than 50 and no greater than 37, respectively. An estimated 16% of Xeric stream length had scores greater than 62 (the median for the Mountains), while 5% of Plains stream length had scores that exceeded 62. This IBI development process is less subjective and more streamlined and has more clearly defined criteria for metric selection and scoring than those used in the past, while maintaining a strong ecological foundation.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barbour M. T., 1999, Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers
Baxter G. T., 1970, Wyoming fishes
Brown C. J. D., 1971, Fishes of Montana
Connor E. J., 1988, Effects of logging on Pacific giant salamanders: Influence of age‐class composition and habitat complexity, Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 69, 104
Davis W. S., 1995, Biological assessment and criteria: Tools for water resource planning and decision making
Fore L. S., 2003, Biological response signatures: Indicator patterns using aquatic communities, 445
Frey D. G., 1977, The integrity of water, 127
Fuller P. L., 1999, Special Publication 27
Herlihy A. T., 2006, Landscape influences on stream habitats and biological assemblages, 87
Hilsenhoff W. L., 1977, Use of arthropods to evaluate water quality of streams
Hilsenhoff W. L., 1987, An improved biotic index of organic stream pollution, Great Lakes Entomologist, 20, 31
Hughes R. M., 1995, Biological assessment and criteria: Tools for water resource planning and decision making for rivers and streams, 31
Hughes R. M., 1999, Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities, 79
Karr J. R., 2006, Seven foundations of biological monitoring and assessment, Biologia Ambientale, 20, 7
Karr J. R., 1999, Restoring life in running waters: Better biological monitoring
Karr J. R., 1986, Assessing biological integrity in running waters: A method and its rationale
Karr J. R., 2003, A terrestrial arthropod index of biological integrity for shrub‐steppe landscapes, Northwest Science, 77, 202
Kaufmann P. R., 1999, Quantifying physical habitat in wadeable streams
Lee D. S., 1980, Atlas of North American freshwater fishes
Lyons J., 2001, Development, validation, and application of a fish‐based index of biotic integrity for Wisconsin's large warmwater rivers, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 130, 1007, 10.1577/1548-8659(2001)130<1077:DVAAOA>2.0.CO;2
Minckley W. L., 1973, Fishes of Arizona
Moyle P. B., 1976, Inland fishes of California
Moyle P. B., 1999, Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities, 367
Page L. M., 1991, A field guide to freshwater fishes
Peck D. V., Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Surface Waters Western Pilot Study—field operations manual for nonwadeable rivers and streams
Peck D. V., 2006, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Surface Waters Western Pilot Study—field operations manual for wadeable streams
Sigler W. F., 1987, Fishes of the Great Basin: A natural history
Sigler W. F., 1996, Fishes of Utah: A natural history
Simon T. P., 1999, Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resource quality using fish communities
Simon T. P., 1999, Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities, 97
Simon T. P., 1995, Biological assessment and criteria: Tools for water resource planning and decision making, 245
Simpson J. C., 1982, Fishes of Idaho
Stebbins R. C., 1954, Amphibians and reptiles of the western United States
Stoddard J. L., 2005, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP): Western streams and rivers statistical summary
Stoddard J. L., 2005, An ecological assessment of western streams and rivers
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 1996, Level III ecoregions of the continental United States (revised from Omernik 1987)
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 2006, Wadeable streams assessment: A collaborative survey of the nation's streams
Whittier T. R., 2006, Landscape influences on stream habitats and biological assemblages, 641
Wydoski R. S., 1979, Inland fishes of Washington
Yoder C. O., 1995, Biological assessment and criteria: Tools for water resource planning and decision making, 109
Yoder C. O., 2005, Historical changes in large‐river fish assemblages of the Americas, 399
Zaroban D. W., 1999, Classification of species attributes for Pacific Northwest freshwater fishes, Northwest Science, 73, 81