A Streetcar Undesired: Investigating Ergonomics and Human Factors Issues in the Driver–cab Interface of Australian Trams
Tóm tắt
Australia is home to the biggest light rail network and the industry is currently undergoing a renaissance. However, there is little
research to indicate the extent to which well-informed human factors and ergonomics practises are being incorporated into tram cab design. A lack of standardised features may create transfer conflicts between cabs, as well as operational issues and concerns for occupational health. The aim of this paper is to improve our understanding of the socio-technical complexity of light rail and to enhance how design standards are informed in this domain. Various human factors methods were used, including observational cab rides, objective force assessments, interviews, and focus groups. Data were collected across two sites and analysed thematically. Analysis of data suggested a substandard level human factors and ergonomics input in the design of the cab and driver interface that violated many key tenets of established design guidelines. These were particularly concerned with the usability of the master controller (i.e. throttle lever) and various issues in the design of the tram driver workspace. Findings also revealed a number of subtle yet significant features associated with delivery of service that created safety-performance conflicts. In conclusion, very little human factors input of tram driving, and the ergonomics considerations of the driver’s workplace in general, appear to be going into the design of tram cabs. This may be related to the practice of using non-specific standards for developing trams and/or poorly integrating human factors and ergonomics into their specification processes. Some considerations for future work are given.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Currie G, Burke M (2013) Light rail in Australia—performance and prospects. Paper presented at the Australasian Transport Research Forum, Brisbane, Australia
Australasian Railway Association (2015) Capital metro: Canberra’s light rail project in a global context. Author, Canberra
Nye B (2015) Light rail in Australasia: the economic, social and environmental case. In: Proceedings of 2015 light rail conference, NSW, AU March 5–6 2015
Macdonald A, Coxon S (2011) Towards a more accessible tram system in Melbourne—challenges for infrastructure design. Paper presented at the Australasian Transport Research Forum, Adelaide, Australia
Alstom Transport (2011) What will your Citadis be? Author. http://www.alstom.com/transport/products-and-services/trains/tramway-citadis/
Good Design Australia (2014) Good design awards 2014. Crowther Blayne, Surfers Paradise
Carey A (2012,) Tram cop a low blow as report slams design flaws. The Age (July 14)
Wickens CD, Hollands JG (2000) Engineering psychology and human performance, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
Mitra B, Al Jubair J, Cameron PA, Gabbe BJ (2010) Tram-related trauma in Melbourne, Victoria. Emerg Med Australas 22(4):337–342. doi:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01309.x
Middendorp C (2010) Hop on tram for on hell of a scary ride. The Sydney Morning Herald, December 23
Union Internationale des Chemins der fer (2009) Driver machine interfaces for EMU/DMU, locomotives and driving coaches—functional and system requirements associated with harmonised Driver Machine Interfaces. Author, Paris, France
Woods D, Hollnagel E (2006) Joint cognitive systems: patterns in cognitive systems engineering. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton
Gould JD, Lewis C (1985) Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Commun ACM 28(3):300–311
Norman D (1988) The design of everyday things. Basic Books, New York
Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H (2002) Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, New York
Foot R, Doniol-Shaw G (2008) Questions raised on the design of the “dead-man” device installed on trams. Cogn Technol Work 10(1):41–51
Cooke NJ (1994) Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. Int J Hum Comput Stud 41(6):801–849
Naweed A (2014) Investigations into the skills of modern and traditional train driving. Appl Ergon 45(3):462–470. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.06.006
Naweed A, Balakrishnan G, Bearman C, Dorrian J, Dawson D (2012) Scaling generative scaffolds towards train driving expertise. In: Contemporary ergonomics and human factors 2012, pp 235–236
Naweed A (2013) Psychological factors for driver distraction and inattention in the Australian and New Zealand rail industry. Acc Anal Prev 60:193–204. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.08.022
Huberman MA, Miles MB (1994) Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 209–219
Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd, London
Naweed A, Rainbird S, Dance C (2015) Are you fit to continue? Approaching rail systems thinking at the cusp of safety and the apex of performance. Saf Sci. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.1002.1016
Naweed A, Balakrishnan G, Bearman C, Dorrian J, Dawson D (2012) Scaling generative scaffolds towards train driving expertise. In: Anderson M (ed) Contemporary ergonomics and human factors 2012: proceedings of the international conference on ergonomics & human factors 2012. CRC Press, Blackpool, p 235–236
Powell C (2003) The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs 41(4):376–382
Hsu CC (2007) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(10):1
Edworthy J, Hellier E, Noyes J, Aldrich K, Naweed A, Metcalfe GR (2008) Good practice guide for the design of alarms and alerts. Rail Safety Standards Board, London
Branton P (1979) Investigations into the skills of train-driving. Ergonomics 22(2):155–164
Cœugnet S, Naveteur J, Antoine P, Anceaux F (2013) Time pressure and driving: work, emotions and risks. Transp Res Part F 20:39–51. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2013.05.002
MoD (2000) Human factors integration: an introductory guide. HMSO, London
Bisantz A, Roth (2008) Analysis of cognitive work. In: Boehm-Davis DA (ed) Reviews of human factors and ergonomics. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, pp 1–43