A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 6 Số 3 - Trang 211-228 - 2008
Malhar N. Kumar1
1503, Nisarga, Royal Park Residency, JP Nagar 9th Phase, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560062, India

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Altman, D. G. (1994). The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 308, 283–284.

Barnes, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (1998). Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1566–1570. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1566 .

Bégaud, B., & Verdoux, H. (2001). Did the US boycott of French products spread to include scientific output? BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 329, 1430–1431. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7480.1430 .

Bekelman, J. E., Liu, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research. a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 89, 454–465. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.4.454 .

Bennett, D. M., & Taylor, D. M. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine, 15, 263–270.

Bero, L. A., Galbraith, A., & Rennie, D. (1992). The publications of sponsored symposiums in medical journals. The New England Journal of Medicine, 327, 1135–1140.

Best, C. H. (1974). A short essay on the importance of dogs in medical research. The Physiologist, 17, 437–439.

Black’s Law Dictionary (1979).St Paul, Minnesota: West, page 1882

Brian, C. M., & Melissa, S. A. (2005). Raymond de Vries: scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737–736. doi: 10.1038/435737a .

Broad, W. J. (1980). Would-be academician pirates papers: five of his published papers are demonstrable plagiarisms, and more than 55 others are suspect. Science, 208, 1438–1440. doi: 10.1126/science.208.4451.1438 .

Campanario, J. M. (1998). Peer review for journals as it stands today—part 2. Science Communication, 19, 277–306. doi: 10.1177/1075547098019004002 .

Campanario, J. M. (2003). Rejecting nobel class articles and resisting nobel class discoveries. Nature, 425(6959), 645 Oct.

Commander, H. (2000). Biotechnology industry responds to gene therapy death. Nature Medicine, 6, 118. doi: 10.1038/72181 .

Costa, M. M., & Gatz, M. (1992). Determination of authorship credit in published dissertations. Psychological Science, 3, 354–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00046.x .

Couzin, J. (2001). Scientific misconduct: MIT terminates researcher over data fabrication. Science, 310, 578.

Couzin, J., & Schirber, M. (2006). Fraud upends oral cancer field, casting doubts on prevention trial. Science, 311(5760), 448–449. doi: 10.1126/science.311.5760.448a .

Culliton, B. J. (1983). Coping with fraud: the Darsee case. Science, 220, 31–35. doi: 10.1126/science.6828878 .

Curfman, G. D., Morrissey, S., Drazen, J. M. (2006). N Engl J Med Expression of concern: Sudbø et al: DNA content as a prognostic marker in patients with oral leukoplakia, N Engl J Med 2001, 344, 1270–8 and Sudbø J et al: Influence of resection and aneuploidy on mortality in oral leukoplakia, N Engl J Med 2004, 350, 1405–13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033374 .

Davidson, R. A. (1986). Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1, 155–158. doi: 10.1007/BF02602327 .

Deb, K., Sivaguru, M., Yong, H. Y., & Roberts, M. R. (2006). Cdx2 gene expression and trophectoderm lineage specification in mouse embryos. Science, 311(5763), 992–996.

Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2007). Impact of the impact factor in Spain (rapid response to Brown. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 20.

Deyo, R. A., Psaty, B. M., Simon, G., et al. (1997). The messenger under attack—intimidation of researchers by special interest groups. The New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 1176–1180. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704173361611 .

Editorial (2005). Nature Materials, 4(1), 1305.

Edmunds, L. H. (2007). Journal ethics. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 84, 717–719. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.045 .

Emanuel, E. J., & Steiner, D. (1995). Institutional conflict of interest. The New England Journal of Medicine, 332(4), 262–268. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199501263320412 .

Ernest, E., Resch, K. L., & Uner, E. M. (1992). Reviewer bias. Annals of Internal Medicine, 116(11), 958.

Errami, M., & Garner, H. (2008). A tale of two citations. Nature, 451(7177), 397–399. doi: 10.1038/451397a .

Fleet, C. M., Rosser, M. F. N., Zufall, R. A., et al. (2006). Hiring criteria in biology departments of academic institutions. Bioscience, 56, 430–436. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0430:HCIBDO]2.0.CO;2 .

Florey, H. (1962). Prestige in academic scientific research. Nature, 193(4820), 1017–1018. doi: 10.1038/1931017a0 .

Frankel, J. K. (1956). Pathogenesis of Toxoplasmosis and of infections resembling Toxoplasma. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 64, 215–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1956.tb36616.x .

Friedman, L. S., & Richter, E. D. (2004). Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(1), 51–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30617.x .

Garfield, E. (1979). The ‘obliteration phenomenon’ in science—and the advantage of being obliterated. Current Contents, 51/52, 5–7.

Garfield, E. (1980). From citation amnesia to bibliographic plagiarism. Current Contents, 23, 5–9.

Garfield, E. (1982). More on the ethics of scientific publication: abuses of authorship attribution and citation amnesia undermine the reward system of science. Current Contents, 30, 5–10.

Garfield, E. (1987). Contemplating a science court: on the question of institutionalising scientific fact finding. Scientist (Philadelphia, Pa.), 1(6), 9.

Garfield, E. (1991). Bibliographic negligence: a serious transgression. Scientist (Philadelphia, Pa.), 5(23), 14.

Garfield, E. (2002). Demand citation vigilance. Scientist (Philadelphia, Pa.), 16(2), 6.

Ginsburg, I. (2001). The Disregard Syndrome: a menace to honest science. Scientist (Philadelphia, Pa.), 15(24), 51.

Greenacre, P. (1978). Note on plagiarism: the Henley-Stevenson quarrel. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 26, 507–539.

Hajra, A., Liu, P. P., Speck, N. A., & Collins, F. S. (1995). Over expression of core-binding factor alpha (CBF alpha) reverses cellular transformation by CBF beta smooth muscle myosin heavy chain chimeric oncoprotein. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 15, 4980–4889.

Hixson, J. (1976). The patch work mouse. New York: Anchor/Doubleday Garden City.

Hwang, W. S., Roh, S. I., Lee, B. C., et al. (2005). Patient specific embryonic stem cells derived from human SCNT blastocysts. Science, 308, 1777–1783. doi: 10.1126/science.1112286 .

Kennedy, D. (2006). Editorial retraction. Science, 20, 311 (5759), 335.

Kerns, D. G., Cransman, R. S., Durand, K. T. H., et al. (1998). Flock worker’s lung: chronic interstitial lung disease in the nylon flocking industry. Annals of Internal Medicine, 129(4), 261–272.

Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 .

Kliewer, M. A., et al. (2004). Peer review at the american journal of roentgenology: how reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 183, 1545–1550.

Knox, R. A. (1983). Deeper problems for Darsee: emory probe. JAMA, 249(21), 2867 , 2871–2873, 2876.

Kwok, L. S. (2005). The white bull effect: abusive co-authorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(9), 554–556. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.010553 .

Link, A. M. (1998). US and and non US submissions. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 246–247. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.246 .

Lloyd, M. E. (1990). Gender factors in reviewer recommendations for manuscript publication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 539–543. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-539 .

Lock, S. (1994). Does editorial peer review work? Annals of Internal Medicine, 121(1), 60–61.

Lock, S. (1995). Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 310, 1547–1548.

Marshall, E. (1995). Suit alleges misuse of peer review. Science, 270, 1912–1914. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5244.1912 .

Martin, B. R. (1984). Plagiarism and responsibility. Journal of tertiary educational administration, 6, 183–190.

Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science pp. 402–403. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Merton, R. K. (1979). Citation indexing—its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley (Foreword by E. Garfield).

Mills, J. L. (1993). Data torturing. The New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 1196–1199. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199310143291613 .

Moses III, H., & Martin, J. (2001). Academic relationships with industry: a new model for biomedical research. JAMA, 285(7), 933−935 Feb1.

Murch, S. H., Anthony, A., Casson, D. H., et al. (2004). Retraction of an interpretation. Lancet, 363(9411), 75.

Osmond, D. H. (1983). Malice’s wonderland: Research funding and peer review. Journal of Neurobiology, 14, 95−112. doi: 10.1002/neu.480140202 .

Pande, P. G., Shukla, R. R., & Sekariah, P. C. (1961). Toxoplasma from eggs of the domestic fowl (Gallus gallus). Science, 133, 648. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3453.648 .

Parry, J. (2006). University clears scientist of misconduct but says his conduct was misbehaviour. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 332, 3. 82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.382-d .

Ray, J. G. (2002). Judging the judges. The Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 95, 769–774.

Relman, A. S. (1983). Lessons from the Darsee affair. The New England Journal of Medicine, 308, 1415–1417.

Rennie, D. (1991). Editors and advertisements: what responsibility do the editors have for the advertisements in their journals? Journal of the American Medical Association, 265, 2394. doi: 10.1001/jama.265.18.2394 .

Rennie, D. (1998). Freedom and responsibility in medical publication. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 300–302. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.300 .

Rochon, P. A., Gurwitz, J. H., Cheung, M., Hayes, J. A., & Chalmers, T. C. (1994). Evaluating the quality of articles published in journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 108–113. doi: 10.1001/jama.272.2.108 .

Rothman, K. J. (1993). Conflict of interest: the new McCarthyism in science. Journal of the American Medical Association, 269(21), 2782–2784. doi: 10.1001/jama.269.21.2782 .

Rothman, D. J. (2000). Medical professionalism—focussing on the real issues. The New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 1284–1286. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004273421711 .

Schachman, H. K. (1993). What is misconduct in science? Science, 261, 148–149. doi: 10.1126/science.8305005 .

Smith, W. R. (2007). Pseudo evidence based medicine: what it is, and what to do about it, Clinical Governance. International Journal (Toronto, Ont.), 12(1), 42–52.

Sommer, T. J. (2001). Suppression of scientific research: bahramdipity and nulltiple scientific discoveries. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 77–104. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0025-7 .

Sorokin, P. (1956). Fads and foibles on modern sociology and related sciences p. 357. Chicago: H. Regency.

Stelfox, H. T., Chua, G., O’Rourke, K., & Detsky, A. S. (1998). Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium channel antagonists. The New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 101–105. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801083380206 .

Stricker, R. B. (1985). Target platelet antigen in homosexual men with immune thrombocytopenia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 313, 1315–1380.

Sudbø, J., Lee, J. J., Lippman, S. M., et al. (2005). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and the risk of oral cancer: a nested case-control study. Lancet, 366(9494), 1359–1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67488-0 .

Summerlin, W. T., Miller, G. E., & Good, R. A. (1973). Successful tissue and organ transplantation without immunosuppression. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 52, 349.

Thompson, D. F. (1993). Understanding financial conflicts of interest. The New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 573–576. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308193290812 .

Toy, J. (2002). Ingelfinger rule. Science Editor, 25(6), 195.

Valderas, J. M., Bentley, R. A., Beckley, R., et al. (2007). Why do team-authored papers get cited more? Science, 317, 14 Sept, 5844, 1496b.

Wakefield, A. J., Murch, S. H., Anthony, A., et al. (1998). Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non specific colitis and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet, 351(9103), 637–641. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11096-0 .

Weissman, G. (2006). Science fraud: from patch work mouse to patch work data. The FASEB Journal, 20, 587–590. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-0401ufm .

Wenneras, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature, 387, 341–343. doi: 10.1038/387341a0 .

Wright, J. K. (1944). Human nature in science. Science, 100(2597), 299–305. doi: 10.1126/science.100.2597.299 .

Wutchy, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316, 1036–1039. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099 .

Zuckermann, H. A. (1968). Patterns of name-ordering among authors of scientific papers: a study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology, 74, 276–291. doi: 10.1086/224641 .