A Review of Performance Bonding in Forest Policy Settings

Venn TJ, Calkin DE. Accommodating non-market values in evaluation of wildfire management in the United States: challenges and opportunities. Int J Wildland Fire. 2011;20(3):327–39.

Amacher GS, Ollikainen M, Koskela E. Economics of forest resources. Cambridge: Mit Press; 2009.

Sterner, T., Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. 2003: Resources for the Future.

Andréassian V. Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate. J Hydrol. 2004;291(1):1–27.

Brown AE, Zhang L, McMahon TA, Western AW, Vertessy RA. A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation. J Hydrol. 2005;310(1):28–61.

Loehle C, Wigley Jr TB, Lucier Jr A, Schilling E, Danehy RJ, Ice G. Toward improved water quality in forestry: opportunities and challenges in a changing regulatory environment. J For. 2014;112(1):41.

Cubbage F, Harou P, Sills E. Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management. Forest Policy Econ. 2007;9(7):833–51.

Walls, M., Deposit-refund systems in practice and theory. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, 2011(11–47).

Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates, The theory of environmental policy. 1988: Cambridge university press.

Montgomery, C.A. and M.S. Crandall, The economics of old-growth forests, in handbook of forest resource economics, S. Kant and J.R.R. Alavalapati, Editors. 2014, Routledge.

Coase, R.H., The problem of social cost. 1960: Springer.

Koskela E, Ollikainen M. Optimal private and public harvesting under spatial and temporal interdependence. For Sci. 2001;47(4):484–96.

Montgomery, C.A., An agent and a consequence of land use change. The Oxford Handbook of Land Economics, 2014: p. 281.

Crowley CSL, Malik AS, Amacher GS, Haight RG. Adjacency externalities and forest fire prevention. Land Econ. 2009;85(1):162–85.

Vokoun M, Amacher GS, Sullivan J, Wear D. Examining incentives for adjacent non-industrial private forest landowners to cooperate. Forest Policy Econ. 2010;12(2):104–10.

Busby G, Albers HJ. Wildfire risk management on a landscape with public and private ownership: who pays for protection? Environ Manag. 2010;45(2):296–310.

Lehmann, P., Using a policy mix for pollution control: a review of economic literature. 2008, UFZ-Diskussionspapiere.

Cohen, M.A., Monitoring and enforcement of environmental policy. Available at SSRN 120108, 1998.

Russell CS. Monitoring and enforcement. Public policies for environmental protection. 1990;232(251):34–45.

Gray WB, Shimshack JP. The effectiveness of environmental monitoring and enforcement: a review of the empirical evidence. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 2011;5(1):3–24.

Kibler KM, Skaugset A, Ganio LM, Huso MM. Effect of contemporary forest harvesting practices on headwater stream temperatures: initial response of the Hinkle Creek catchment, Pacific Northwest. USA Forest Ecology and Management. 2013;310:680–91.

Groom JD, Dent L, Madsen LJ, Fleuret J. Response of western Oregon (USA) stream temperatures to contemporary forest management. For Ecol Manag. 2011;262(8):1618–29.

Kolstad, C.D., Environmental economics. Second ed. 2011: Oxford University Press.

Croke J, Hairsine P. Sediment delivery in managed forests: a review. Environ Rev. 2006;14(1):59–87.

Lankoski J, Ollikainen M. Agri-environmental externalities: a framework for designing targeted policies. Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2003;30(1):51–75.

Shortle JS, Horan RD. The economics of nonpoint pollution control. J Econ Surv. 2001;15(3):255–89.

Liu Y, Goodrick S, Achtemeier G, Jackson WA, Qu JJ, Wang W. Smoke incursions into urban areas: simulation of a Georgia prescribed burn. Int J Wildland Fire. 2009;18(3):336–48.

Newton M, Ice G. Regulating riparian forests for aquatic productivity in the Pacific Northwest, USA: addressing a paradox. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23(2):1149–57.

Dennis, R.A., E. Meijaard, R. Nasi, and L. Gustafsson, Biodiversity conservation in Southeast Asian timber concessions: a critical evaluation of policy mechanisms and guidelines. 2008.

Rametsteiner E, Simula M. Forest certification—an instrument to promote sustainable forest management? J Environ Manag. 2003;67(1):87–98.

McComb WC, McGrath MT, Spies TA, Vesely D. Models for mapping potential habitat at landscape scales: an example using northern spotted owls. For Sci. 2002;48(2):203–16.

Schirpke U, Tasser E, Tappeiner U. Predicting scenic beauty of mountain regions. Landsc Urban Plan. 2013;111:1–12.

Ice G. History of innovative best management practice development and its role in addressing water quality limited waterbodies. J Environ Eng. 2004;130(6):684–9.

Aust WM, Blinn CR. Forestry best management practices for timber harvesting and site preparation in the eastern United States: an overview of water quality and productivity research during the past 20 years (1982–2002). Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus. 2004;4(1):5–36.

Ice GG, Schilling E, Vowell J. Trends for forestry best management practices implementation. J For. 2010;108(6):267–73.

Karsenty A, Drigo IG, Piketty M-G, Singer B. Regulating industrial forest concessions in Central Africa and South America. For Ecol Manag. 2008;256(7):1498–508.

Gray, J.A., Forest concession policies and revenue systems: country experience and policy changes for sustainable tropical forestry. Vol. 522. 2002: World Bank Publications.

Boscolo, M. and J.R. Vincent, Promoting better logging practices in tropical forests: a simulation analysis of alternative regulations. Land Economics, 2000: p. 1–14.

Boston K, Bettinger P. An economic and landscape evaluation of the green-up rules for California, Oregon, and Washington (USA). Forest Policy Econ. 2006;8(3):251–66.

Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN. Environmental policy and technological change. Environmental & Resource Economics. 2002;22(1–2):41–69.

Requate T. Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments—a survey. Ecol Econ. 2005;54(2–3):175–95.

Becker GS. Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ. 1968:169–217.

Malik AS. Permanent versus interim regulations: a game-theoretic analysis. J Environ Econ Manag. 1991;21(2):127–39.

Malik AS. Enforcement costs and the choice of policy instruments for controlling pollution. Econ Inq. 1992;30(4):714.

Amacher GS, Koskela E, Ollikainen M. Royalty reform and illegal reporting of harvest volumes under alternative penalty schemes. Environ Resour Econ. 2007;38(2):189–211.

Amacher GS, Ollikainen M, Koskela E. Corruption and forest concessions. J Environ Econ Manag. 2012;63(1):92–104.

Kuusela, O.-P. and G.S. Amacher, Changing political regimes and tropical deforestation. environmental and resource economics, 2015: p. 1–19.

Wunder S. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conserv Biol. 2007;21(1):48–58.

Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. Designing payments for the environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol Econ. 2008;65:663–74.

Bulte EH, Lipper L, Stringer R, Zilberman D. Payments for ecosystem services and poverty reduction: concepts, issues, and empirical perspectives. Environ Dev Econ. 2008;13:245–54.

Zilberman D, Lipper L, McCarthy N. When could payments for environmental services benefit the poor? Environ Dev Econ. 2008;13:1–24.

Alix-Garcia J, de Janvry A, Sadoulet E. The role of deforestation risk and calibrated compensation in designing payments for environmental services. Environ Dev Econ. 2008;13:375–94.

Alix-Garcia J, Wolff H. Payments for ecosystem services from forests. Ann Rev Resour Econ. 2014;5.

Blackman A. Evaluating forest conservation policies in developing countries using remote sensing data: an introduction and practical guide. Forest Policy Econ. 2013;34:1–16.

Greiner R, Young M, McDonald A, Brooks M. Incentive instruments for the sustainable use of marine resources. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2000;43(1):29–50.

Mathis ML, Baker PB. Assurance bonds: a tool for managing environmental costs in aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics & Management. 2002;6(1–2):1–17.

Parry IW, Bento AM. Tax deductions, environmental policy, and the “double dividend” hypothesis. J Environ Econ Manag. 2000;39(1):67–96.

Boyd, J., Financial responsibility for environmental obligations: are bonding and assurance rules fulfilling their promise? Vol. 20. 2002: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Sullivan J, Amacher GS. Private and social costs of surface mine reforestation performance criteria. Environ Manag. 2010;45(2):311–9.

Coria J, Sterner T. Natural resource management: challenges and policy options. AnnuRevResourEcon. 2011;3(1):203–30.

Sullivan J, Amacher GS. The social costs of mineland restoration. Land Econ. 2009;85(4):712–26.

Gerard D. The law and economics of reclamation bonds. Resources policy. 2000;26(4):189–97.

Gerard D, Wilson EJ. Environmental bonds and the challenge of long-term carbon sequestration. J Environ Manag. 2009;90(2):1097–105.

Davis, L., Modernizing bonding requirements for natural gas producers. The Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 2012.

Davis, L.W., Bonding requirements for US natural gas producers. Review of environmental economics and policy, 2015: p. reu015.

Bohm, P., Deposit-refund systems: theory and applications to environmental, conservation, and consumer policy. 1981, Resources for the Future, Inc., Washington, DC (United States); Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD (United States).

Becker, G.S. and G.J. Stigler, Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. The Journal of Legal Studies, 1974: p. 1–18.

Perrings C. Environmental bonds and environmental research in innovative activities. Ecol Econ. 1989;1(1):95–110.

Costanza R, Perrings C. A flexible assurance bonding system for improved environmental management. Ecol Econ. 1990;2(1):57–75.

Shogren JF, Herriges JA, Govindasamy R. Limits to environmental bonds. Ecol Econ. 1993;8(2):109–33.

Leruth, L., R. Paris, and I. Ruzicka, The complier pays principle: the limits of fiscal approaches toward sustainable forest management. IMF Staff Papers, 2001: p. 397–423.

Fullerton D, Wu W. Policies for green design. J Environ Econ Manag. 1998;36(2):131–48.

Fullerton D, Wolverton A. The two-part instrument in a second-best world. J Public Econ. 2005;89(9):1961–75.

Palmer K, Walls M. Optimal policies for solid waste disposal taxes, subsidies, and standards. J Public Econ. 1997;65(2):193–205.

Fullerton D, Kinnaman TC. Garbage, recycling, and illicit burning or dumping. J Environ Econ Manag. 1995;29(1):78–91.

Dana DA, Wiseman HJ. Market approach to regulating the energy revolution: assurance bonds, insurance, and the certain and uncertain risks of hydraulic fracturing. A Iowa L Rev. 2013;99:1523.

Van Kooten GC, Binkley CS, Delcourt G. Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. Am J Agric Econ. 1995;77(2):365–74.

Cristan R, Aust WM, Bolding MC, Barrett SM, Munsell JF, Schilling E. Effectiveness of forestry best management practices in the United States: literature review. For Ecol Manag. 2016;360:133–51.

Groom, J.D., L. Dent, and L.J. Madsen, Stream temperature change detection for state and private forests in the Oregon Coast Range. Water Resources Research, 2011. 47(1).

Richardson JS, Naiman RJ, Bisson PA. How did fixed-width buffers become standard practice for protecting freshwaters and their riparian areas from forest harvest practices? Freshwater Science. 2012;31(1):232–8.

Lee P, Smyth C, Boutin S. Quantitative review of riparian buffer width guidelines from Canada and the United States. J Environ Manag. 2004;70(2):165–80.

Naylor BJ, Mackereth RW, Kreutzweiser DP, Sibley PK. Merging END concepts with protection of fish habitat and water quality in new direction for riparian forests in Ontario: a case study of science guiding policy and practice. Freshwater Science. 2012;31(1):248–57.

Siry JP, Cubbage FW, Ahmed MR. Sustainable forest management: global trends and opportunities. Forest Policy Econ. 2005;7(4):551–61.

Boltz F, Holmes TP, Carter DR. Economic and environmental impacts of conventional and reduced-impact logging in tropical South America: a comparative review. Forest Policy Econ. 2003;5(1):69–81.

Ezzine de Blas D, Pérez MR. Prospects for reduced impact logging in central African logging concessions. For Ecol Manag. 2008;256(7):1509–16.

Putz FE, Sist P, Fredericksen T, Dykstra D. Reduced-impact logging: challenges and opportunities. For Ecol Manag. 2008;256(7):1427–33.

Holmes TP, Blate GM, Zweede JC, Pereira Jr R, Barreto P, Boltz F, Bauch R. Financial and ecological indicators of reduced impact logging performance in the eastern Amazon. For Ecol Manag. 2002;163(1):93–110.

Medjibe VP, Putz FE. Cost comparisons of reduced-impact and conventional logging in the tropics. J For Econ. 2012;18(3):242–56. This paper compares the results from 11 case studies that have analyzed the costs and benefits for harvesters of adopting RIL techniques. The results vary greatly between the different case studies, some showing net benefits whereas others net costs. This paper organizes the case studies based on their methods and definitions to make more meaningful comparisons between their results and to understand the causes for the discrepancies.

Macpherson AJ, Carter DR, Schulze MD, Vidal E, Lentini MW. The sustainability of timber production from Eastern Amazonian forests. Land Use Policy. 2012;29(2):339–50.

Paris, R., I. Ruzicka, and H. Speechly, Performance guarantee bonds for commercial management of natural forests-early experience from the Philippines. The Commonwealth Forestry Review, 1994: p. 106–112.

Merry FD, Amacher GS. Forest taxes, timber concessions, and policy choices in the Amazon. J Sustain For. 2005;20(2):15–44.

Karsenty A. Forest taxation regime for tropical forests: lessons from Central Africa. Int For Rev. 2010;12(2):121–9.

Macpherson AJ, Carter DR, Lentini MW, Schulze MD. Following the rules: Brazilian logging concessions under imperfect enforcement and royalties. Land Econ. 2010;86(3):493–513. This study is the most recent attempt to assess the effectiveness of performance bonds in weak enforcement environments together with other policy instruments such as renewability audits and ad valorem and revenue-based royalties. Using a simulation study, they find that performance bonds have advantages over other instruments, but the participation constraint can hinder their effectiveness.

Anderson, R., Incentive-based policies for environmental management in developing countries. Resources for the Future Issue Brief, 2002. 2(07).

Ruzicka I. Taxation of tropical forests: search for generalizations after half a century of trying 1. Int For Rev. 2010;12(2):181–6.

Nasi R, Putz FE, Pacheco P, Wunder S, Anta S. Sustainable forest management and carbon in tropical Latin America: the case for REDD. Forests. 2011;2(1):200–17.

Hyde, W.F., The global economics of forestry. 2012: Routledge.

Dombeck MP, Williams JE, Wood CA. Wildfire policy and public lands: integrating scientific understanding with social concerns across landscapes. Conserv Biol. 2004;18(4):883–9.

NIFC, Wildland fire statistics. National Interagency Fire Center. Boise, ID. Available from: http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_statistics.html, 2014.

Everett Y, Fuller M. Fire safe councils in the interface. Soc Nat Resour. 2011;24(4):319–33.

Fischer AP, Charnley S. Risk and cooperation: managing hazardous fuel in mixed ownership landscapes. Environ Manag. 2012;49(6):1192–207.

Butry D, Donovan G. Protect thy neighbor: investigating the spatial externalities of community wildfire hazard mitigation. For Sci. 2008;54(4):417–28.

Shafran AP. Risk externalities and the problem of wildfire risk. J Urban Econ. 2008;64(2):488–95.

Busby GM, Albers HJ, Montgomery CA. Wildfire risk Management in a landscape with fragmented ownership and spatial interactions. Land Econ. 2012;88(3):496–517. Fragmentation of land ownership and the growing number of households living in the wildland-urban interface bring additional challenges to the mitigation of wildfire risks in the landscape level. This paper models fuel treatment decisions across a range of land-ownership patterns with spatially correlated fire risk and strategic behavior. They find that investments to fuel treatment depend on the level of ownership fragmentation and on the nature of expected damages on forest values.

Busby G, Amacher GS, Haight RG. The social costs of homeowner decisions in fire-prone communities: information, insurance, and amenities. Ecol Econ. 2013;92:104–13.

Yoder J. Playing with fire: endogenous risk in resource management. Am J Agric Econ. 2004;86(4):933–48.

Monroe MC, Nelson KC. The value of assessing public perceptions: wildland fire and defensible space. Appl Environ Educ Commun. 2004;3(2):109–17.

Brenkert-Smith H, Champ PA, Flores N. Insights into wildfire mitigation decisions among wildland-urban interface residents. Soc Nat Resour. 2006;19(8):759–68.

Amacher GS, Malik AS, Haight RG. Not getting burned: the importance of fire prevention in forest management. Land Econ. 2005;81(2):284–302.

Zhang DW, Flick WA. Sticks, carrots, and reforestation investment. Land Econ. 2001;77(3):443–56.

Reed WJ. The effects of the risk of fire on the optimal rotation of a Forest. J Environ Econ Manag. 1984;11(2):180–90.

Reed WJ, Errico D. Techniques for assessing the effects of Pest hazards on long-run timber supply. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere. 1987;17(11):1455–65.

Reed WJ, Apaloo J. Evaluating the effects of risk on the economics of juvenile spacing and commercial thinning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere. 1991;21(9):1390–400.

Yin RS, Newman DH. The effect of catastrophic risk on forest investment decisions. J Environ Econ Manag. 1996;31(2):186–97.

Englin J, Boxall P, Hauer G. An empirical examination of optimal rotations in a multiple-use forest in the presence of fire risk. J Agric Resour Econ. 2000;25(1):14–27.

Goodnow R, Sullivan J, Amacher GS. Ice damage and forest stand management. J For Econ. 2008;14(4):268–88.

Lal R. Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manag. 2005;220(1):242–58.

Sohngen B, Mendelsohn R. An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration. Am J Agric Econ. 2003;85(2):448–57.

Van Kooten, G.C. and B. Sohngen, Economics of forest ecosystem carbon sinks: a review. 2007.

Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science. 2011;333(6045):988–93.

Lintunen, J. and Uusivuori J., On the economics of forest carbon: renewable and carbon neutral but not emission free. 2014.

Mason CF, Plantinga AJ. The additionality problem with offsets: optimal contracts for carbon sequestration in forests. J Environ Econ Manag. 2013;66(1):1–14.