A Review of Interface-Driven Adaptivity for Phase-Field Modeling of Fluid–Structure Interaction

Biswajeet Rath1, Xiaoyu Mao1, Rajeev Jaiman1
1the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Tóm tắt

In this paper, we systematically review interface-driven mesh adaptation procedures for the phase-field modeling of fluid–structure interaction problems. One of the popular ways of handling fluid–structure interaction problems involving large solid deformations is the fully Eulerian approach. In this procedure, we use a fixed computational grid over which a diffused interface description can be used to evolve the fluid–structure boundary. The Eulerian solid representation and a diffuse interface method necessitate the use of adaptive mesh refinement to achieve reasonable accuracy for the problem at hand. We explore the usage of mesh refinement techniques for such FSI problems and focus specifically on interface-driven adaptivity. We present comparisons among various error indicators for the adaptive procedure of the unstructured mesh. We finally explore some possible future directions and challenges in the field.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Shyy W, Berg M, Ljungqvist D (1999) Flapping and flexible wings for biological and micro air vehicles. Prog Aerosp Sci 35(5):455–505 Li Y, Scanavino M, Capello E, Dabbene F, Guglieri G, Vilardi A (2018) A novel distributed architecture for UAV indoor navigation. Transport Res Procedia 35:13–22 Joshi V, Jaiman RK, Ollivier-Gooch C (2020) A variational flexible multibody formulation for partitioned fluid–structure interaction: application to bat-inspired drones and unmanned air-vehicles. Comput Math Appl 80(12):2707–2737 Jaiman R, Guan M, Miyanawala T (2016) Partitioned iterative and dynamic subgrid-scale methods for freely vibrating square-section structures at subcritical Reynolds number. Comput Fluids 133:68–89 Joshi V, Gurugubelli P, Law Y, Jaiman R, Adaikalaraj P (2018) A 3D coupled fluid-flexible multibody solver for offshore vessel-riser system. In: International conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, vol 51210. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 002–08009 Griffith BE, Patankar NA (2020) Immersed methods for fluid–structure interaction. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 52(1):421–448 Trivedi D, Rahn CD, Kier WM, Walker ID (2008) Soft robotics: biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research. Appl Bionics Biomech 5(3):99–117 Kier WM, Smith KK (1985) Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular-hydrostats. Zool J Linn Soc 83(4):307–324 Belytschko T, Kennedy J (1976) A fluid–structure finite element method for the analysis of reactor safety problems. Nucl Eng Des 38(1):71–81 Radovitzky R, Ortiz M (1998) Lagrangian finite element analysis of Newtonian fluid flows. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43(4):607–619 Hirt CW, Amsden AA, Cook J (1974) An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. J Comput Phys 14(3):227–253 Hughes TJ, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29(3):329–349 Hu HH, Patankar NA, Zhu M (2001) Direct numerical simulations of fluid-solid systems using the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian technique. J Comput Phys 169(2):427–462 Liu J, Marsden AL (2018) A unified continuum and variational multiscale formulation for fluids, solids, and fluid–structure interaction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 337:549–597 Peskin CS (2002) The immersed boundary method. Acta Numerica 11:479–517 LeVeque RJ, Li Z (1994) The immersed interface method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources. SIAM J Numer Anal 31(4):1019–1044 Griffith BE, Patankar NA (2020) Immersed methods for fluid–structure interaction. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 52:421–448 Zhang L, Gerstenberger A, Wang X, Liu WK (2004) Immersed finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(21–22):2051–2067 Wang X, Zhang LT (2010) Interpolation functions in the immersed boundary and finite element methods. Comput Mech 45(4):321–334 Roy S, Heltai L, Costanzo F (2015) Benchmarking the immersed finite element method for fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput Math Appl 69(10):1167–1188 Griffith BE (2012) On the volume conservation of the immersed boundary method. Commun Comput Phys 12(2):401–432 Casquero H, Zhang YJ, Bona-Casas C, Dalcin L, Gomez H (2018) Non-body-fitted fluid–structure interaction: divergence-conforming b-splines, fully-implicit dynamics, and variational formulation. J Comput Phys 374:625–653 Glowinski R, Pan T-W, Hesla TI, Joseph DD, Periaux J (2001) A fictitious domain approach to the direct numerical simulation of incompressible viscous flow past moving rigid bodies: application to particulate flow. J Comput Phys 169(2):363–426 Parvizian J, Düster A, Rank E (2007) Finite cell method. Comput Mech 41(1):121–133 Burman E, Hansbo P (2012) Fictitious domain finite element methods using cut elements: II. A stabilized Nitsche method. Appl Numer Math 62(4):328–341 Belytschko T, Black T (1999) Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45(5):601–620 Chessa J, Belytschko T (2003) An extended finite element method for two-phase fluids. J Appl Mech 70(1):10–17 Wagner GJ, Ghosal S, Liu WK (2003) Particulate flow simulations using lubrication theory solution enrichment. Int J Numer Methods Eng 56(9):1261–1289 Gerstenberger A, Wall WA (2008) An extended finite element method/Lagrange multiplier based approach for fluid–structure interaction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(19–20):1699–1714 Dunne T (2006) An Eulerian approach to fluid–structure interaction and goal-oriented mesh adaptation. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 51(9–10):1017–1039 Wick T (2013) Fully Eulerian fluid–structure interaction for time-dependent problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 255:14–26 Richter T (2013) A fully Eulerian formulation for fluid–structure-interaction problems. J Comput Phys 233:227–240 Jain SS, Kamrin K, Mani A (2019) A conservative and non-dissipative Eulerian formulation for the simulation of soft solids in fluids. J Comput Phys 399:108922 Valkov B, Rycroft CH, Kamrin K (2015) Eulerian method for multiphase interactions of soft solid bodies in fluids. J Appl Mech 82(4):041011 Dunne T, Rannacher R (2006) Adaptive finite element approximation of fluid–structure interaction based on an Eulerian variational formulation. In: Fluid–structure interaction: modelling, simulation, optimisation. Springer, Berlin, pp 110–145 Rath B, Mao X, Jaiman RK (2023) An interface preserving and residual-based adaptivity for phase-field modeling of fully Eulerian fluid–structure interaction. J Comput Phys 488:112188 Liu C, Walkington NJ (2001) An Eulerian description of fluids containing visco-elastic particles. Arch Ration Mech Anal 159(3):229–252 Mao X, Jaiman R (2023) An interface and geometry preserving phase-field method for fully Eulerian fluid–structure interaction. J Comput Phys 476:111903 Sugiyama K, Ii S, Takeuchi S, Takagi S, Matsumoto Y (2011) A full Eulerian finite difference approach for solving fluid–structure coupling problems. J Comput Phys 230(3):596–627 Waals JD (1979) The thermodynamic theory of capillarity under the hypothesis of a continuous variation of density. J Stat Phys 20(2):200–244 Sethian JA (2001) Evolution, implementation, and application of level set and fast marching methods for advancing fronts. J Comput Phys 169(2):503–555 Fedkiw SOR, Osher S (2002) Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces. Surfaces 44:77 Sussman M, Smereka P, Osher S (1994) A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J Comput Phys 114(1):146–159 Gibou F, Fedkiw R, Osher S (2018) A review of level-set methods and some recent applications. J Comput Phys 353:82–109 Zhao L, Bai X, Li T, Williams J (2014) Improved conservative level set method. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 75(8):575–590 Sussman M, Fatemi E (1999) An efficient, interface-preserving level set redistancing algorithm and its application to interfacial incompressible fluid flow. SIAM J Sci Comput 20(4):1165–1191 Peng D, Merriman B, Osher S, Zhao H, Kang M (1999) A PDE-based fast local level set method. J Comput Phys 155(2):410–438 Olsson E, Kreiss G (2005) A conservative level set method for two phase flow. J Comput Phys 210(1):225–246 Anderson DM, McFadden GB, Wheeler AA (1998) Diffuse-interface methods in fluid mechanics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30(1):139–165 Braun R, Murray B (1997) Adaptive phase-field computations of dendritic crystal growth. J Cryst Growth 174(1–4):41–53 Karma A, Rappel W-J (1996) Phase-field method for computationally efficient modeling of solidification with arbitrary interface kinetics. Phys Rev E 53(4):3017 Rubinstein J, Sternberg P (1992) Nonlocal reaction-diffusion equations and nucleation. IMA J Appl Math 48(3):249–264 Bretin E, Brassel M (2009) A modified phase field approximation for mean curvature flow with conservation of the volume. arXiv:0904.0098 Sun Y, Beckermann C (2007) Sharp interface tracking using the phase-field equation. J Comput Phys 220(2):626–653 Mao X, Joshi V, Jaiman R (2021) A variational interface-preserving and conservative phase-field method for the surface tension effect in two-phase flows. J Comput Phys 433:110166 Copetti MIM, Elliott CM (1992) Numerical analysis of the Cahn-Hilliard equation with a logarithmic free energy. Numerische Mathematik 63(1):39–65 Barrett JW, Blowey JF (1995) An error bound for the finite element approximation of the Cahn-Hilliard equation with logarithmic free energy. Numerische Mathematik 72(1):1–20 Kim J, Lee HG (2021) Unconditionally energy stable second-order numerical scheme for the Allen-Cahn equation with a high-order polynomial free energy. Adv Differ Equ 2021(1):1–13 Zee KG, Brummelen EH, Akkerman I, Borst R (2011) Goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for fluid–structure interaction using exact linearized adjoints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(37–40):2738–2757 Cai D, Cai Z (2018) A hybrid a posteriori error estimator for conforming finite element approximations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 339:320–340 Joshi V, Jaiman RK (2018) An adaptive variational procedure for the conservative and positivity preserving Allen-Cahn phase-field model. J Comput Phys 366:478–504 Bartels S, Müller R, Ortner C (2011) Robust a priori and a posteriori error analysis for the approximation of Allen-Cahn and Ginzburg-Landau equations past topological changes. SIAM J Numer Anal 49(1):110–134 Zhang Z, Tang H (2007) An adaptive phase field method for the mixture of two incompressible fluids. Comput Fluids 36(8):1307–1318 Vasconcelos D, Rossa A, Coutinho A (2014) A residual-based Allen-Cahn phase field model for the mixture of incompressible fluid flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 75(9):645–667 Funken S, Praetorius D, Wissgott P (2011) Efficient implementation of adaptive P1-FEM in Matlab. Comput Methods Appl Math 11(4):460–490 Wick T (2014) Flapping and contact fsi computations with the fluid–solid interface-tracking/interface-capturing technique and mesh adaptivity. Comput Mech 53:29–43 Mitchell WF (1991) Adaptive refinement for arbitrary finite-element spaces with hierarchical bases. J Comput Appl Math 36(1):65–78 Chen L, Zhang C-S (2006) Afem@ matlab: a Matlab package of adaptive finite element methods. Technique Report, Department of Mathematics, University of Maryland at College Park Dörfler W (1996) A convergent adaptive algorithm for Poisson’s equation. SIAM J Numer Anal 33(3):1106–1124