A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding “Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Epidural Blocks and Spinal Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial”
Tài liệu tham khảo
Chen S, Wei A, Min J, Li L, Zhang Y. Comparison of ultrasound-guided caudal epidural blocks and spinal anesthesia for anorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Pain Ther. 2022;11(2):713–21.
Shon Y-J, Huh J, Kang S-S, et al. Comparison of saddle, lumbar epidural and caudal blocks on anal sphincter tone: a prospective, randomized study. J Int Med Res. 2016;44(5):1061–71.
Gardner IH, Siddharthan RV, Tsikitis VL. Benign anorectal disease: hemorrhoids, fissures, and fistulas. Ann Gastroenterol. 2020;33(1):9–18.
Hegde R, Trombold JM, Dominguez JM. Colorectal surgery review for primary care providers. Mo Med. 2020;117(2):154–8.
Gayathri B, Swetha Ramani CK, Urkavalan K, Pushparani A, Rajendran A. Comparison of the time taken for subarachnoid block using ultrasound-guided method versus landmark technique for cesarean section - a randomized controlled study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021;37(2):205–9.
Zhu H, Hu S, Wang Z. Spinal anesthesia and caudal anesthesia for anorectal surgery: an analysis of 74 cases. World Chin J Digestol. 2012;20(26):2534–7 (in Chinese).
Barham G, Hilton A. Caudal epidurals: the accuracy of blind needle placement and the value of a confirmatory epidurogram. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(9):1479–83.