A Real-World Observational Study Evaluating the Probability of Glycemic Control with Basal Insulin or Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Tóm tắt
The effectiveness of basal insulin (BI) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in providing glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Japanese routine practice is not well known. This real-world observational study evaluated the probability of achieving glycemic control in Japanese patients with T2D uncontrolled by oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) who initiated BI or GLP-1 RA therapy. Patients with T2D aged ≥ 18 years initiating BI or GLP-1 RA therapy following treatment with OADs were selected from real-world data (RWD) retrieved from a large electronic medical record database in Japan, using data from 01 January 2010 to 30 June 2019. Patients were required to have glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7% within 90 days prior to the first prescription of BI or GLP-1 RA. The probability of reaching first HbA1c < 7% was assessed over a 24-month period in cohorts of patients who initiated BI (n = 3477) or GLP-1 RA (n = 780) and in subcohorts by number of OADs at baseline (1, 2, or ≥ 3), HbA1c at baseline (≥ 7 to < 8%, ≥ 8 to < 9%, or ≥ 9%), and age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years). Mean (standard deviation) baseline HbA1c was 9.4% (1.8%) and 8.8% (1.4%) in patients initiating BI or GLP-1 RA therapy, respectively. The cumulative probability of achieving glycemic control was 50.1% with BI and 60.3% with GLP-1 RA therapy, respectively, at 12 months, and 60.8% and 66.6%, respectively, at 24 months. Quarterly (3-month intervals) conditional probabilities of achieving glycemic control decreased over time and were < 10% after 12 months. Patients with more OADs or higher HbA1c at baseline had a lower probability of achieving glycemic control. Among Japanese patients with T2D who initiated BI or GLP-1 RA therapy after treatment with OADs, the probability of reaching first glycemic control diminished over time. Further therapy intensification is warranted in patients who do not achieve glycemic control within 6–12 months with BI or GLP-1 RA, particularly those with high HbA1c or taking multiple OADs. Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who are taking oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) but still have high blood glucose often require injectable drugs, such as basal insulin (BI) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). While BI and GLP-1 RAs have been shown to be effective in controlled clinical trials, it is unclear how well they improve blood glucose in real-world routine practice. Here, we report the results of an observational study that used data retrieved from a large electronic medical records database in Japan to explore how well BI and GLP-1 RAs allow patients to achieve glycemic control [glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) < 7%]. In Japanese patients with T2D receiving treatment with OADs and initiating BI or GLP-1 RA therapy, the probability of achieving glycemic control in the first quarter (3 months) after initiation was 20.3% with BI and 38.6% with GLP-1 RA. Among those patients who had not previously reached glycemic control, the probability of achieving first glycemic control declined over time, as evidenced in each quarterly assessment, and it was < 10% after the first year. Patients who had higher HbA1c levels or were taking multiple OADs were less likely to achieve glycemic control compared with those with lower HbA1c or taking fewer OADs. Our findings suggest that patients who have not achieved their glycemic goals within the first 6–12 months after starting BI or GLP-1 RA therapy have a low likelihood of achieving their target by maintaining the same therapy. For such patients, intensification with additional medication (e.g., combined BI and GLP-1 RA therapy) should be considered early in treatment.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Kahn SE, Cooper ME, Del PS. Pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Lancet. 2014;383:1068–83.
Saisho Y. β-cell dysfunction: its critical role in prevention and management of type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2015;6:109–24.
Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995;28:103–17.
[No authors listed]. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352:837–53.
Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018;41:2669–701.
Haneda M, Noda M, Origasa H, et al. Japanese clinical practice guideline for diabetes 2016. Diabetol Int. 2018;9:1–45.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Suppl 1):S1–S212.
Levin PA, Nguyen H, Wittbrodt ET, Kim SC. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review of comparative effectiveness research. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2017;10:123–39.
Madenidou AV, Paschos P, Karagiannis T, et al. Comparative benefits and harms of basal insulin analogues for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:165–74.
Porcellati F, Lin J, Lucidi P, Bolli GB, Fanelli CG. Impact of patient and treatment characteristics on glycemic control and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes initiated to insulin glargine or NPH: a post hoc, pooled, patient-level analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e6022.
Singh S, Wright EE Jr, Kwan AY, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:228–38.
Blonde L, Meneghini L, Peng XV, et al. Probability of achieving glycemic control with basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes in real-world practice in the USA. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9:1347–58.
Peng XV, Blonde L, Shepherd L, Lubwama R, Ji L, McCrimmon RJ. A real-world retrospective study evaluating glycaemic control with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or basal insulin in type 2 diabetes in the UK. Diabetologia. 2019;62(Suppl 1):864.
STROBE. STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology 2014. Available from: https://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=strobe-home. Accessed 6 Nov 2019.
Kobayashi M, Tsukube S, Ikeda Y, Shuto Y. Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with insulin glargine and oral hypoglycaemic agents including DPP-4 inhibitors in Japanese T2DM patients: ALOHA 2 study, a post-marketing surveillance for Lantus®. J Diabetes Mellitus. 2014;4:273–89.
Satoh J, Andersen M, Bekker Hansen B, et al. Clinical inertia in basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes—results from a retrospective database study in Japan (JDDM 43). PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0198160.
Ishii H, Iwamoto Y, Tajima N. An exploration of barriers to insulin initiation for physicians in Japan: findings from the Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes And Needs (DAWN) JAPAN study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e36361.
Morita Y, Murayama H, Odawara M, Bauer M. Treatment patterns of drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese hospital database. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019;11:90.
Terauchi Y, Koyama M, Cheng X, et al. Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL compared with glargine 100 U/mL in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin plus oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs (EDITION JP 2 randomised 12-month trial including 6-month extension). Diabetes Metab. 2017;43:446–52.
Onishi Y, Iwamoto Y, Yoo SJ, Clauson P, Tamer SC, Park S. Insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26-week, randomized, controlled, pan-Asian, treat-to-target trial. J Diabetes Investig. 2013;4:605–12.
Araki E, Inagaki N, Tanizawa Y, Oura T, Takeuchi M, Imaoka T. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide in combination with sulphonylurea and/or biguanide compared with once-daily insulin glargine in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, open-label, phase III, non-inferiority study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:994–1002.
Inagaki N, Ueki K, Yamamura A, Saito H, Imaoka T. Long-term safety and efficacy of exenatide twice daily in Japanese patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. 2011;2:448–56.
Inagaki N, Atsumi Y, Oura T, Saito H, Imaoka T. Efficacy and safety profile of exenatide once weekly compared with insulin once daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetes drug(s): results from a 26-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, noninferiority study. Clin Ther. 2012;34:1892–908.
Kaku K, Kiyosue A, Ono Y, et al. Liraglutide is effective and well tolerated in combination with an oral antidiabetic drug in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, 52-week, open-label, parallel-group trial. J Diabetes Investig. 2016;7:76–84.
Kaku K, Yamada Y, Watada H, et al. Safety and efficacy of once-weekly semaglutide vs additional oral antidiabetic drugs in Japanese people with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:1202–12.
Seino Y, Terauchi Y, Wang X, Watanabe D, Niemoeller E, Study Investigators. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of lixisenatide as monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an open-label, multicenter study. J Diabetes Investig. 2018;9:108–18.
Edelman SV, Polonsky WH. Type 2 diabetes in the real world: the elusive nature of glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1425–32.