Một cách nhìn lượng tử về cơ hội doanh nhân: vượt ra ngoài các quan điểm Khám Phá và Sáng Tạo

Small Business Economics - Trang 1-15 - 2024
Jiyao Chen1, Stephen X. Zhang2, Erik Lundmark3,4
1Innovation Management, College of Business, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA
2Entrepreneurship, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
3Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
4Project, Innovations and Entrepreneurship (PIE), Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Bài viết này ánh sáng mới về cuộc tranh luận giữa hai quan điểm Khám Phá và Sáng Tạo về cơ hội doanh nhân bằng cách dựa vào lý thuyết lượng tử. Chúng tôi phát triển quan điểm Lượng tử về cơ hội, giải thích cách mà cơ hội vừa được khám phá vừa được tạo ra. Quan điểm Lượng tử cho rằng bản thể học và nhận thức luận của cơ hội là không thể tách rời, điều này giải thích lý do tại sao cơ hội không bao giờ có thể được xác định hoàn toàn. Chúng tôi lập luận, tương tự như quan điểm Khám Phá, rằng cơ hội tồn tại như các trạng thái tiềm ẩn độc lập với các doanh nhân và rằng, tương tự như quan điểm Sáng Tạo, cơ hội được hiện thực hóa thông qua hành động doanh nhân, điều này thay đổi bản chất của cơ hội. Chúng tôi sử dụng quan điểm Lượng tử như một hình ảnh gợi mở tư duy giúp phá vỡ khuôn mẫu của những suy nghĩ đã ăn sâu bấy lâu và vượt qua sự phân đôi giữa Khám Phá và Sáng Tạo để nâng cao hiểu biết của chúng ta về doanh nghiệp. Chúng tôi thảo luận về cách quan điểm Lượng tử liên quan đến các nghiên cứu lý thuyết và thực tiễn đã được thiết lập trong lĩnh vực doanh nhân.

Từ khóa

#cơ hội doanh nhân #lý thuyết lượng tử #quan điểm khám phá #quan điểm sáng tạo

Tài liệu tham khảo

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41, 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9 Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3 Alvarez, S., & Barney, J. (2013). Epistemology, opportunities, and entrepreneurship: Comments on Venkataraman, et al (2012) and Shane (2012). Academy of Management Review, 38, 154–157. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0069 Alvarez, S., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4 Alvarez, S., & Barney, J. B. (2010). Entrepreneurship and epistemology: The philosophical underpinnings of the study of entrepreneurial opportunities. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 557–583. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495521 Alvarez, S., & Barney, J. B. (2020). Has the concept of opportunities been fruitful in the field of entrepreneurship? Academy of Management Perspectives, 34, 300–310. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0014 Aparicio, S., Urbano, D., & Audretsch, D. (2016). Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.006 Audretsch, D. B., & Link, A. N. (2019). Sources of knowledge and entrepreneurial behavior. University of Toronto Press. Auerswald, P., & Dani, L. (2022). Entrepreneurial opportunity and related specialization in economic ecosystems. Research Policy, 51, 104445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104445 Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329 Ball, P. (2018). Beyond weird: Why everything you thought you knew about quantum physics is different. London: The Bodley Head. Barach, M. A., & Rider, C. I. (2023). Discovery, discernment, and exploitation: Entrepreneurial mechanisms at the nexus of individual and opportunity. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3528 Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28, 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00014-X Berglund, H., Bousfiha, M., & Mansoori, Y. (2020). Opportunities as artifacts and entrepreneurship as design. Academy of Management Review, 45, 825–846. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0285 Bruza, P. D., Wang, Z., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2015). Quantum cognition: A new theoretical approach to psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.001 Busemeyer, J. R., & Bruza, P. D. (2012). Quantum models of cognition and decision. Cambridge University Press. Busemeyer, J. R., Pothos, E. M., Franco, R., & Trueblood, J. S. (2011). A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. Psychological Review, 118, 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022542 Casson, M., & Wadeson, N. (2007). The discovery of opportunities: Extending the economic theory of the entrepreneur. Small Business Economics, 28, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9037-7 Cornelissen, J. P. (2005). Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 751–764. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.18378876 Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002 Davidsson, P. (2023). Ditching discovery-creation for unified venture creation research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47, 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211030870 Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258701025004 Dimov, D. (2011). Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00423.x Dirac, P. A. M. (1981). The principles of quantum mechanics. Oxford University Press. Dyck, B., & Greidanus, N. S. (2017). Quantum sustainable organizing theory: A study of organization theory as if matter mattered. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616656407 Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1966). Evolution of physics. Touchstone. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2017). Entrepreneurial discovery or creation? In search of the middle ground. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 733–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0046 Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2020). Entrepreneurial opportunities: Who needs them? Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0181 Gartner, W. B. (1989). Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13, 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878801200401 Gartner, W. B. (1993). Words lead to deeds: Towards an organizational emergence vocabulary. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90029-5 Griffiths, D. J. (2005). Introduction to quantum mechanics (2nd ed.). Pearson Prentice-Hall. Hahn, T., & Knight, E. (2021). The ontology of organizational paradox: A quantum approach. Academy of Management Review, 46, 362–384. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0408 Hmieleski, K. M., Carr, J. C., & Baron, R. A. (2015). Integrating discovery and creation perspectives of entrepreneurial action: The relative roles of founding CEO human capital, social capital, and psychological capital in contexts of risk versus uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(4), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1208 Hofstadter, D. (2001). Analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (pp. 499–538). The MIT Press/Bradford Book. Hunt, R. A., Lerner, D. A., Johnson, S. L., Badal, S., & Freeman, M. A. (2022). Cracks in the wall: Entrepreneurial action theory and the weakening presumption of intended rationality. Journal of Business Venturing, 37, 106190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106190 Karami, M., & Read, S. (2021). Co-creative entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(4), 106125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106125 Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 457–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325 Kimjeon, J., & Davidsson, P. (2022). External enablers of entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for accumulation of strategically actionable knowledge. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 643–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211010673 Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press. Kirzner, I. M. (2009). The alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification. Small Business Economics, 32(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9153-7 Knight, E. R. W., & Hahn, T. (2021). Paradox and quantum mechanics -Implications for the management of organizational paradox from a quantum approach. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 73, 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2021000073a010 Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Beard Books. Korsgaard, S., Berglund, H., Thrane, C., & Blenker, P. (2016). A tale of two Kirzners: Time, uncertainty, and the “nature” of opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 867–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12151 Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. The essential guide for progressives. White River Junction. Vermont, USA: Chelsea Green Publishing. Lakoff, G. P., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. Li, X. (2021). Quantum approach to organizational paradox: A Copenhagen perspective. Academy of Management Review, 46, 412–415. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0480 Lord, R., Dinh, J., & Hoffman, E. (2015). A quantum approach to time and organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 40, 263–290. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0273 Lundmark, E., Krzeminska, A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2019). Images of entrepreneurship: Exploring root metaphors and expanding upon them. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43, 138–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717734369 Lundmark, E., & Westelius, A. (2014). Entrepreneurship as elixir and mutagen. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 575–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12004 Lundmark, E., & Westelius, A. (2019). Antisocial entrepreneurship: Conceptual foundations and a research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 11, e00104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00104 Mansoori, Y., & Lackeus, M. (2020). Comparing effectuation to discovery-driven planning, prescriptive entrepreneurship, business planning, lean startup, and design thinking. Small Business Economics, 54, 791–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00153-w McBride, R., & Wuebker, R. (2022). Social objective and entrepreneurial opportunities. Academy of Management Review, 47, 75–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0451 McMullen, J. S., Fitzsimmons, J., Shetty, K., & Ramoglou, S. (2023). A temporal typology of entrepreneurial opportunities: Implications for optimal timing of entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 39(1), 106356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106356 McMullen, J. S., Plummer, L. A., & Acs, Z. J. (2007). What is an entrepreneurial opportunity? Small Business Economics, 28, 273–283. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379628 McMullen, J., & Shepherd, D. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31, 132–152. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379628 Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization (updated). Sage. Osepchuk, J. M. (1984). A history of microwave heating applications. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 32(9), 1200–1224. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.1984.1132831 Ramoglou, S. (2021a). Knowable opportunities in an unknowable future? On the epistemological paradoxes of entrepreneurship theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(2), 106090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106090 Ramoglou, S. (2021b). Why do disequilibria exist? An ontological study of Kirznerian economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 45(4), 833–856. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beab015 Ramoglou, S., & Gartner, W. B. (2023). A historical intervention in the “opportunity wars”: Forgotten scholarship, the discovery/creation disruption, and moving forward by looking backward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(4), 1521–1538. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211069310 Ramoglou, S., & McMullen, J. S. (2022). “What is an opportunity?”: From theoretical mystification to everyday understanding. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0335 Ramoglou, S., & Tsang, E. (2016). A realist perspective of entrepreneurship: Opportunities as propensities. Academy of Management Review, 41, 410–434. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0281 Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976 Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020 Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 367–472. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602 Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5 Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 Tweedie, S. (2015). How the microwave was invented by a radar engineer who accidentally cooked a candy bar in his pocket, Business insider. Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., & Audretsch, D. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: What has been learned? Small Business Economics, 53, 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0038-0 Venkataraman, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., & Forster, W. R. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0038-0 Winter, S. G. (2016). The place of entrepreneurship in “the economics that might have been.” Small Business Economics, 47, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9701-5 Wright, M., & Phan, P. (2020). Opportunity: Is there a future in the construct? Academy of Management Perspectives, 34, 297–299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0162