A Prioritized Information Fusion Method for Handling Fuzzy Decision-Making Problems
Tóm tắt
Although Yager has presented a prioritized operator for fuzzy subsets, called the non-monotonic operator, it can not be used to deal with multi-criteria fuzzy decision-making problems when generalized fuzzy numbers are used to represent the evaluating values of criteria. In this paper, we present a prioritized information fusion algorithm based on the similarity measure of generalized fuzzy numbers. The proposed prioritized information fusion algorithm has the following advantages: (1) It can handle prioritized multi-criteria fuzzy decision-making problems in a more flexible manner due to the fact that it allows the evaluating values of criteria to be represented by generalized fuzzy numbers or crisp values between zero and one, and (2) it can deal with prioritized information filtering problems based on generalized fuzzy numbers.
Tài liệu tham khảo
1 R.E. Bellman and L.A. Zadeh, “Decision making in a fuzzy environment,” Management Science, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 141–164, 1970.
2 K. Hirota and W. Pedrycz, “Non-monotonic fuzzy set operations: A generalization and some applications,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 12, no. 15, pp. 483–493, 1997.
3 R.R. Yager, “Second order structures in multi-criteria decision making,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 36, no. 16, pp. 553–570, 1992.
4 R.R. Yager, “Structures for prioritized fusion of fuzzy information,” Information Sciences, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 71–90, 1998.
5 R.R. Yager, “Non-monotonic set theoretic operations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 173–190, 1991.
6 H.J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making, and Expert Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, USA, 1987.
7 S.M. Chen, “Aggregating fuzzy opinions in the group decision-making environment,” Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 363–376, 1998.
8 S.J. Chen and C.L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992.
9 F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and J.L. Verdegay, “A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 31–49, 1997.
10 H.S. Lee, “An optimal aggregation method for fuzzy opinions of group decision,” in Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Tokyo, Japan, 1999, pp. 314–319.
11 S.H. Chen, “Operations on fuzzy numbers with function principle,” Tamkang Journal of Management Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 1985.
12 S.H. Chen, “Ranking generalized fuzzy number with graded mean integration,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, 1999, pp. 899–902.
13 S.J. Chen and S.M. Chen, “Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2003.
14 D. Dubois, “Modeles mathematiques l’imprecis et de l’incertain en vue d’applications aux techniques d’aide a la decision,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Universite’ Scientifique et Me’dicale de Grenoble, 1983.
15 A. Gonzalez, O. Pons, and M.A, “Vila. Dealing with uncertainty and imprecision by means of fuzzy numbers,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 233–256, 1999.
16 S.J. Chen and S.M. Chen, “A new method for handling the fuzzy ranking and the defuzzification problems,” in Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Fuzzy Theory and Its Applications, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, 2000.
17 S.J. Chen and S.M. Chen, “Aggregating fuzzy opinions in the heterogeneous group decision-making environment,” Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, vol. 36, no. 3, 2005.
18 S.J. Chen and S.M. Chen, “A new ranking method for handling outsourcing targets selection problems,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Management, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, 2002, pp. 103–110.
19 B. Rich, Theory and Problems of Geometry, McGraw-Hill: New York, U.S.A., 1989.
20 M.J. Wierman, “Central values of fuzzy numbers–-Defuzzification,” Information Sciences, vol. 100, nos. 1–4, pp. 207–215, 1997.
21 R.R. Yager, “Fuzzy sets and approximate reasoning in decision and control,” in Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, San Diego, California, 1992, pp. 415–428.
22 R.R. Yager and D.P. Filev, “On the issue of defuzzification and selection based on a fuzzy set,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 255–272, 1993.
23 C.H. Cheng, “A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 307–317, 1998.
24 P. Subasic and K. Hirota, “Similarity rules and gradual rules for analogical and interpolative reasoning with imprecise data,”Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 53–75, 1998.
25 C.H. Hsieh and S.H. Chen, “Similarity of generalized fuzzy numbers with graded mean integration representation,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, 1999, pp. 551–555.
26 S. Murakami, S. Maeda, and S. Imamura, “Fuzzy decision analysis on the development of centralized regional energy control systems,” in Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium on Fuzzy Information, Knowledge Representation and Decision Analysis, Pergamon Press: New York, 1983, pp. 363–368.
27 R.R. Yager, “On a general class of fuzzy connectives,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 235–242, 1980.
28 S.J. Chen and S.M. Chen, “A new method for handling multi-criteria fuzzy decision making problems using FN-IOWA operators,” Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 109–137, 2003.
29 L.A. Zadeh, “A theory of approximate reasoning,” Machine Intelligence, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 149–194, 1979.
30 R.R. Yager, “Using approximate reasoning to represent default knowledge,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 99–112, 1987.
31 G.Q. Zhang, “On fuzzy number-valued fuzzy measures defined by fuzzy number-valued fuzzy integrals I,”Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 227–237, 1992.
32 G.Q. Zhang, “On fuzzy number-valued fuzzy measures defined by fuzzy number-valued fuzzy integrals II,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 257–265, 1992.
33 A. Kaufmann and M.M. Gupta, Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science, North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1988.
34 A. Junghanns, C. Posthoff, and M. Schlosser, “Search with fuzzy numbers,” in Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Yokohama, Japan, 1995, pp. 979–986.
35 G. Bordogna and G. Pasi, “Linguistic aggregation operators of selection criteria in fuzzy information retrieval,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 233–248, 1995.
36 S.J. Chen and S.M. Chen, “A prioritized information fusion algorithm for handling multi-criteria fuzzy decision-making problems,” in Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Singapore, 2002.
37 D. Dubois and H. Prade, Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty, Plenum Press: New York, 1988.
38 M.L. Ginsberg, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Morgan Kaufman: Los Altos, California, 1987.
39 M.M. Gupta, A. Kandel, W. Bandler, and J.B. Kiszka, Approximate Reasoning in Expert Systems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.
40 S. Miyamoto, Fuzzy Sets in Information Retrieval and Cluster Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Massachusetts, 1990.
41 D. Ramot, R. Milo, M. Friedman, and A. Kandel, “On fuzzy correlations,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 381–390, 2001.
42 M.A. Potter, “The design and analysis of a computational model of cooperative coevolution,” Ph.D. dissertation, George Mason University, 1997.