A Practical Guide to Patch Testing

Fleming, 2000, Accuracy of questions related to allergic contact dermatitis, Am J Contact Dermat, 11, 218, 10.1053/ajcd.2000.8587

Rosmarin, 2009, Patch-testing while on systemic immunosuppressants, Dermatitis, 20, 265, 10.2310/6620.2009.09005

Prens, 1989, Effects of topically applied glucocorticosteroids on patch test responses and recruitment of inflammatory cells in allergic contact dermatitis, Agents Actions, 26, 125, 10.1007/BF02126583

Aldridge, 1986, Topical cyclosporin A in nickel contact hypersensitivity: results of a preliminary clinical and immunohistochemical investigation, Clin Exp Immunol, 66, 582

Warshaw, 2013, North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2009 to 2010, Dermatitis, 24, 50, 10.1097/DER.0b013e3182819c51

Zug, 2009, Patch-test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006, Dermatitis, 20, 149, 10.2310/6620.2009.08097

Warshaw, 2015, North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2011-2012, Dermatitis, 26, 49, 10.1097/DER.0000000000000097

Fisher, 2008

De Groot, 2008

Jordan, 1986, The American Academy of Dermatology patch test tray, Arch Dermatol, 122, 1127, 10.1001/archderm.1986.01660220045011

Goh, 1992, Comparative study of TRUE test and Finn Chamber patch test techniques in Singapore, Contact Dermatitis, 27, 84, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb05215.x

Kalimo, 1984, 24 and 48 h allergen exposure in patch testing. Comparative study with 11 common contact allergens and NiCl2, Contact Dermatitis, 10, 25, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1984.tb00057.x

Geier, 1999, Patch test reactions at D4, D5 and D6, Contact Dermatitis, 40, 119, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06008.x

Jonker, 2000, The outcome of an additional patch-test reading on days 6 or 7, Contact Dermatitis, 42, 330, 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042006330.x

Davis, 2008, Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2005, Arch Dermatol, 144, 67, 10.1001/archdermatol.2007.2

Dickel, 2000, Delayed readings of a standard screening patch test tray: frequency of “lost,” “found,” and “persistent” reactions, Am J Contact Dermat, 11, 213, 10.1053/ajcd.2000.8008

Flannigan, 1983, Time considerations in scoring contact irritant patch test sites, Contact Dermatitis, 9, 519, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1983.tb04482.x

Wilkinson, 1970, Terminology of contact dermatitis, Acta Derm Venereol, 50, 287

Carlson, 2010, Relevance of doubtful (“equivocal”) late patch-test readings, Dermatitis, 21, 102, 10.2310/6620.2010.09047

White, 2012, Patch testing: what allergists should know, Clin Exp Allergy, 42, 180, 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03862.x

Duarte, 2002, Excited skin syndrome: study of 39 patients, Am J Contact Dermat, 13, 59

Cockayne, 2000, Angry back syndrome is often due to marginal irritants: a study of 17 cases seen over 4 years, Contact Dermatitis, 43, 280, 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043005280.x

Duarte, 2002, Interference of the position of substances in an epicutaneous patch test battery with the occurrence of false-positive results, Am J Contact Dermat, 13, 125

Nethercott, 1994, Disease outcome in workers with occupational skin disease, J Am Acad Dermatol, 30, 569, 10.1016/S0190-9622(94)70064-8

Fransway, 2013, North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008, Dermatitis, 24, 10, 10.1097/DER.0b013e318277ca50

van der Valk, 2003, Evidence-based diagnosis in patch testing, Contact Dermatitis, 48, 121, 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.00072.x

Moward, 2001, Cocamidopropyl betaine allergy, Am J Contact Dermat, 12, 223

Pratt, 2004, North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results; 2001–2002 study period, Dermatitis, 15, 176

Ale, 2004, Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE TestTM, Contact Dermatitis, 50, 304, 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00351.x

Fischer, 2007, Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds, Br J Dermatol, 157, 723, 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08095.x