A Phenomenological Approach to the Study of Social Distance

Banega, H. (2014). Stock of knowledge as determined by class position: A Marxist phenomenology? Schutzian Research, 6, 47–60. Barber, M. (2001). Equality and diversity. Phenomenological investigations of prejudice and discrimination. Humanity Books. Bourdieu, P. (1990). Social space and symbolic power. Other words essay towards a reflexive sociology. (pp. 123–139). Polity Press. Butler, J. (2020). Capitalism has its limits. In VersoBooks (Ed.), Judith Butler discuss the COVID-19 pandemic, and its escalating political and social effects in America. Verso Books. Cefaï, D., Zimmermann, B., Nicolae, S., & Endress, M. (2015). Special issue on sociology of valuation and evaluation introduction. Human Studies, 38(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-015-9344-6 Chaluf, M. (2020). Escraches, estigma y linchamientos por redes, la otra cara de la pandemia. Diarios Bonaerenses. Dastur, F. (2011). The question of the other in French phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review, 44(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-011-9175-8 Dreher, J. (2009). Phenomenology of friendship: Construction and constitution of an existential social relationship. Human Studies, 32(4), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9130-4 Durkheim, E. (1984 [1893]). The division of labour in society. The Macmillan Press. Ethington, P. J. (1997). The intellectual construction of 'Social Distance': toward a recovery of Georg Simmel’s social geometry. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. Epistémologie, Histoire de la Géographie, Didactique, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.227 Frisby, D. (2004). Georg Simmel. Routledge. Gover, A., Harper, S., & Langton, L. (2020). Anti-Asian hate crime during the COVID-19. Pandemic: Exploring the reproduction of inequality. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 647–667. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. Hamauzu, S. (2009). Schutz and Edmund Husserl: For phenomenology of intersubjectivity. In H. Nasu, L. Embree, G. Psathas, & I. Srubar (Eds.), Alfred Schutz and his intellectual partners. (pp. 49–67). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. Human Rights Watch. (2020). Covid-19 fueling Anti-Asian Racism and Xenophobia worldwide. New York. Husserl, E. (1973). Beilage XI. Heimwelt, fremde Welt und, ‘die’ Welt (1930 oder 1931). In I. Kern (Ed.), Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass, Dritter Teil: 1929–1935 (Husserliana XV) (pp. 214–218). Martinus Nijhoff. Husserl, E. (1983 [1913]). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology. Martinus Nijhoff. Kadushin, C. (1962). Social distance between client and professional. American Journal of Sociology, 67, 517–531. Karakayali, N. (2009). Social distance and affective orientations. Sociological Forum, 24(3), 538–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01119.x Karakayali, N. (2016). Social distance. In J. Stone, R. M. Dennis, P. S. Rizova, A. D. Smith, & X. Hou (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of race, ethnicity, and nationalism (Vol. Volume V/Sou–Z, pp. 1–2). Wiley. Kipling, R. (1926). Debits and credits. Macmillan. Kjellberg, H., & Mallard, A. (2013). Valuation studies? Our collective two cents. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131111 Koubová, A. (2014). Invisible excess of sense in social interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11. Levine, D., Carter, E., & Miller Gorman, E. (1976). Simmel’s influence on American sociology. I. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 813–845. López, D. (2021). Schutzian social cartography. Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, Forthcoming. López Sáenz, M. C. (2018). A. Schütz (1899–1959). Fundamentación fenomenológica de la sociología comprensiva y sociofenomenología del mundo de la vida. In J. E. González (Ed.), Fenomenología y hermenéutica en la sociología contemporánea (pp. 103–144). Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Luckmann, T. (2007). Kapitel II: Sinnrekonstruktion in den Sozialwissenschaften. In J. Dreher (Ed.), Lebenswelt, Identität und Gesellschaft. UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. Marotta, V. (2000). The stranger and social theory. Thesis Eleven, 62, 121–134. Martínez, E. (1999). Introducción. In R. E. Park (Ed.), La ciudad y otros ensayos de ecología urbana. Ediciones del Serbal. McLemore, D. (1970). Simmel’s “Stranger”: A critique of the concept. The Pacific Sociological Review, 13(2), 86–94. Park, R. E. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. The American Journal of Sociology, XXXIII(6), 881–893. Rizo-Patrón, R. (2010). Diferencia y otredad desde la fenomenología de Husserl. Areté. Revista de Filosofía, XXII(1), 87–105. Schutz, A. (1932 [1967]). The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press. Schutz, A. (1962a). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers I. The problem of social reality (pp. 3–47). Martinus Nijhoff. Schutz, A. (1962b). Sartres's theory of the alter ego. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality (pp. 181–203). Martinus Nijhoff. Schutz, A. (1962c). Symbol, reality, and society. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality (pp. 287–356). Martinus Nijhoff. Schutz, A. (1964a). Collected papers II. Studies in Social theory. Martinus Nijhoff. Schutz, A. (1964b). Equality and the meaning structure of the social world. In A. Brodersen (Ed.), Collected papers II. Studies in social theory (pp. 226–269). Martinus Nijhoff. Schutz, A. (1964c). The stranger. An essay in social psychology. In A. Brodersen (Ed.), Collected papers II. Studies in social theory (pp. 91–105). Martinus Nijhoff. Schutz, A. (1970). Reflections on the problem of relevance. Yale University Press. Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1974). The structures of the life-world. Heinemann Educational Books. Schutz, A., & Parsons, T. (1978). The theory of social action: The correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Talcott Parsons. Indiana University Press. Simmel, G. (1950 [1908]). The stranger. In K. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 402–408). The Free Press. Simmel, G. (1971 [1908]). The Stranger. In D. Levine (Ed.), Georg Simmel. On individuality and social forms (pp. 143–149). University of Chicago Press. Srubar, I. (1999). The origin of the political. In L. Embree (Ed.), Schutzian social science. (pp. 23–45). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Srubar, I. (2005). The pragmatic theory of the life-world as a basis for intercultural comparison. In M. Endress, G. Psathas, & H. Nasu (Eds.), Explorations of the life-world. (pp. 235–266). Springer. Steinbock, A. J. (1995). Home and beyond. Generative phenomenology after Husserl. Northwestern University Press. Stonequist, E. (1961 [1937]). The marginal man. A study in personality and culture conflict. Russell & Russell Inc. Tarde, G. (1903 [1890]). The laws of imitation. Henry Holt and Company. Waldenfels, B. (1997). Phänomenologie des Eigenen und des Fremden. In H. Münkler (Ed.), Furcht und Faszination. Facetten der Fremdheit (pp. 63–86). Akademie Verlag. Waldenfels, B. (2001). Mundo familiar y mundo extraño. Problemas de la intersubjetividad y de la interculturalidad a partir de Edmund Husserl. Ideas y Valores, 116, 119–131. Waldenfels, B. (2011). Phenomenology of the alien. Basic concepts. Northwestern University Press. Waldenfels, B., & Steinbock, A. J. (1990). Experience of the Alien in Husserl’s phenomenology. Research in Phenomenology, 20, 19–33. Walsh, G., & Lehnert, F. (1932 [1967]). Acknowledgments. In G. Walsh (Ed.), Schutz, Alfred. The phenomenology of the social world (pp. ix–x). Northwestern University Press. Wark, C., & Galliher, J. (2007). Emory bogardus and the origins of the social distance scale. The American Sociologist(38), 383–395. Weinar, A., Unterreiner, A., & Fargues, P. (Eds.). (2017). Migrant integration between homeland and host society. Volume 1. Where does the country of origin fit? Springer. Wood, M. M. (1934). The stranger: A study in social relationships. Columbia University Press. Zayat, D. (2020). Aumentaronun 40% lasconsultasdiarias en INADI pordiscriminaciónrelacionada con el coronavirus. INADI.