A Network Analysis of Factors Leading Adolescents to Befriend Substance-Using Peers
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akers RL (1985) Deviant behavior: a social learning approach. Wadsworth, Belmont
Baron SW (2003) Self-control, social consequences, and criminal behavior: street youth and the general theory of crime. J Res Crime Delinq 40:403–425
Bauman KE, Ennett ST (1996) On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: commonly neglected considerations. Addiction 91:185–198
Beaver KM, DeLisi M, Mears DP, Stewart E (2009) Low self-control and contact with the criminal justice system in a nationally representative sample of males. Justice Q 26:695–715
Berndt TJ, McCandless MA (2009) Methods for investigating children’s relationships with friends. In: Rubin KH, Bukowski WM, Laursen B (eds) Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Guilford Press, New York, pp 63–81
Blau PM (1977) Inequality and heterogeneity: a primitive theory of social structure. Free Press, New York
Brechwald WA, Prinstein MJ (2011) Beyond homophily: a decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. J Res Adolesc 21:166–179
Burkett SR, Warren BO (1987) Religiosity, peer associations, and adolescent marijuana use: a panel study of underlying causal structures. Criminology 25:109–131
de la Haye K, Green HD, Kennedy DP Jr, Pollard MS, Tucker JS (2013) Selection and influence mechanisms associated with marijuana initiation and use in adolescent friendship networks. J Res Adolesc 23:474–486
Deptula DP, Cohen R (2004) Aggressive, rejected, and delinquent children and adolescents: a comparison of their friendships. Aggress Violent Behav 9:75–104
Dijkstra JK, Lindenberg S, Veenstra R, Steglich C, Isaacs J, Card NA, Hodges EVE (2010) Influence and selection processes in weapon carrying during adolescence: the roles of status, aggression, and vulnerability. Criminology 48:187–220
Dishion TJ, Tipsord JM (2011) Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annu Rev Psychol 62:189–214
Dishion TJ, Piehler TF, Myers MW (2008) Dynamics and ecology of adolescent peer influence. In: Prinstein MJ, Dodge KA (eds) Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. Guilford, New York, pp 72–93
Emirbayer M, Goodwin J (1994) Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. Am J Sociol 99:1411–1454
Engels RCME, Bot SM, Scholte RHJ, Granic I (2007) Peers and adolescent substance use. In: Engels RCME, Kerr M, Stattin H (eds) Friends, lovers and groups: key relationships in adolescence. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 47–60
Ennett ST, Bauman KE (1994) The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: the case of adolescent cigarette smoking. J Pers Soc Psychol 67:653–663
Erickson KG, Crosnoe R, Dornbusch SM (2000) A social process model of adolescent deviance: combining social control and differential association perspectives. J Youth Adolesc 29:395–425
Evans T David, Cullen FT, Burton VS Jr, Gregory Dunaway R, Benson ML (1997) The social consequences of self-control: testing the general theory of crime. Criminology 35:475–504
Feld SL (1982) Social structural determinants of similarity among associates. Am Sociol Rev 47:797–801
Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ (1999) Prospective childhood predictors of deviant peer aliations in adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 40:581–592
Furlong MJ, O’Brennan LM, You S (2011) Psychometric properties of the add health school connectedness scale for 18 sociocultural groups. Psychol Schools 48:986–997
Glueck S, Glueck E (1950) Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Commonwealth Fund, New York
Haas SA, Schaefer DR (2014) With a little help from my friends? Asymmetrical social influence on adolescent smoking initiation and cessation. J Health Soc Behav 55:126–143
Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Miller JY (1992) Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for subatance use prevention. Psychol Bull 112:64–105
Haynie DL (2002) Friendship networks and delinquency: the relative nature of peer influence. J Quant Criminol 18:99–134
Haynie DL, Doogan NJ, Soller B (2014) Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: a dynamic network approach. Criminology 52:688–722
Hill KG, Howell JC, Hawkins JD, Battin-Pearson SR (1999) Childhood risk factors for adolescent gang membership: results from the seattle social development project. J Res Crime Delinq 36:300–322
Hipp JR, Wang C, Butts CT, Jose R, Lakon CM (2015) Research note: the consequences of different methods for handling missing data in stochastic actor based models. Soc Networks 41:56–71
Hirschi T (1969) Causes of delinquency. University of California Press, Berkeley
Hoffman JP (2014) Religiousness, social networks, moral schemas, and marijuana use: a dynamic dual-process model of culture and behavior. Soc Forces 93:181–208
Hoffman BR, Sussman S, Unger JB, Valente TW (2006) Peer influences on adolescent cigarette smoking: a theoretical review of the literature. Subst Use Misuse 41:103–155
Huisman M, Steglich C (2008) Treatment of non-response in longitudinal network studies. Soc Netw 30:297–308
Kandel DB (1978) Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. Am J Sociol 84:427–436
Kirke DM (2004) Chain reactions in adolescents’ cigarette, alcohol and drug use: similarity through peer influence or the patterning of ties in peer networks? Soc Netw 26:3–28
Kiuru N, Burk WJ, Laursen B, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi J-E (2010) Pressure to drink but not to smoke: disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. J Adolesc 33:801–812
Knecht AB, Burk WJ, Weesie J, Steglich C (2010) Friendship and alcohol use in early adolescence: a multilevel social network approach. J Res Adolesc 21:475–487
Kossinets G, Watts DJ (2009) Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. Am J Sociol 115:405–450
Kreager DA, Haynie DL (2011) Dangerous liaisons? Dating and drinking diffusion in adolescent peer networks. Am Sociol Rev 76:737–763
Lakon CM, Wang C, Butts CT, Jose R, Timberlake DS, Hipp JR (2015) A dynamic model of adolescent friendship networks, parental influences, and smoking. J Youth Adolesc 44:1767–1786
Light JM, Dishion TJ (2007) Early adolescent antisocial behavior and peer rejection: a dynamic test of a developmental process. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev 118:77–89
Light JM, Greenan CC, Rusby JC, Nies KM, Snijders TAB (2013) Onset to first alcohol use in early adolescence: a network diffusion model. J Res Adolesc 23:487–499
Longshore D, Change E, Hsieh S, Messina N (2004) Self-control and social bonds: a combined control perspective on deviance. Crime Delinq 50:542–564
Matsueda RL, Anderson K (1998) The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology 36:269–308
McGloin J, Shermer L (2009) Self-control and deviant peer network structure. J Res Crime Delinq 46:35–72
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol 27:415–444
Melby JN, Conger RD, Conger KJ, Lorenz FO (1993) Effects of parental behavior on tobacco use by young male adolescents. J Marriage Fam 55:439–454
Mercken L, Snijders TAB, Steglich C, de Vries H (2009) Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: social network analyses in six european countries. Soc Sci Med 69:1506–1514
Mercken L, Snijders TAB, Steglich C, Vertiainen E, de Vries H (2010) Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Soc Netw 32:72–81
Moody J (2001) Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. Am J Sociol 107:679–716
Moody J, Brynildsen WD, Osgood DW, Feinberg ME, Gest S (2011) Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence. Soc Netw 33:101–112
Mouw T, Entwisle B (2006) Residential segregation and interracial friendship in schools. Am J Sociol 112:394–441
Osgood DW (2012) More complicated than we thought: peer influence from a social network perspective. Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, IL
Osgood DW, Ragan DT, Wallace L, Gest SD, Feinberg ME, Moody J (2013) Peers and the emergence of alcohol use: influence and selection processes in adolescent friendship networks. J Res Adolesc 23:500–512
Patterson GR, Debaryshe B, Ramsey E (1989) A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. Am Psychol 44:329–335
Payne DC, Cornwell B (2007) Reconsidering peer influences on delinquency: do less proximate contacts matter? J Quant Criminol 23:127–150
Pesa JA, Syre TR, Jones E (2000) Psychosocial differences associated with body weight among female adolescents: the importance of body image. J Adolesc Health 26:330–337
Petraitis J, Flay BR, Miller TQ (1995) Reviewing theories of adolescent substance use: organizing pieces of the puzzle. Psychol Bull 117:67–86
Pratt TC, Cullen FT (2000) The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: a meta-analysis. Criminology 38:931–964
Pratt TC, Cullen FT, Sellers CS, Thomas Winfree L Jr, Madensen TD, Daigle LE, Fearn NE, Gau JM (2010) The empirical status of social learning theory: a meta-analysis. Justice Q 27:765–802
Resnick MD et al (1997) Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. J Am Med Assoc 278:823–832
Ripley RM, Snijders TAB, Boda Z, Voros A, Preciado P (2015) Manual for RSiena. University of Oxford, Oxford
Schaefer DR, Kornienko O, Fox AM (2011) Misery does not love company: network selection mechanisms and depression homophily. Am Sociol Rev 76:764–785
Schaefer DR, Haas SA, Bishop N (2012) A dynamic model of US adolescents’ smoking and friendship networks. Am J Public Health 102:e12–e18
Schweinberger M (2012) Statistical modeling of network panel data: goodness-of-fit. Br J Stat Math Psychol 65:263–281
Sijtsema JJ, Lindenberg SM, Veenstra R (2010) Do they get what they want or are they stuck with what they can get? Testing homophily against default selection for friendships of highly aggressive boys. The TRAILS Study. J Abnorm Child Psychol 38:803–813
Snijders TAB (2001) The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociol Methodol 31:361–395
Snijders TAB, van de Bunt GG, Steglich CEG (2010) Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Soc Netw 32:44–60
Steffensmeier D, Allan E (1996) Gender and crime: toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annu Rev Sociol 22:459–487
Steglich C, Snijders TAB, Pearson M (2010) Dynamic networks and behavior: separating selection from influence. Sociol Methodol 40:329–393
Steglich C, Sinclair P, Holliday J, Moore L (2011) Actor-based analysis of peer influence in A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST). Social Networks 34:359–369
Sutherland EH (1947) Principles of criminology, 4th edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia
Urberg KA, Degirmencioglu SM, Pilgrim C (1997) Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoke and alcohol use. Dev Psychol 33:834–844
Urberg KA, Luo Q, Pilgrim C, Degirmencioglu SM (2003) A two-stage model of peer influence in adolescent substance use: individual and relationship-specific differences in susceptibility to influence. Addict Behav 28:1243–1256
Verkooijen KT, de Vries NK, Nielsen GA (2007) Youth crowds and substance use: the impact of perceived group norm and multiple group identification. Psychol Addict Behav 21:55–61
Wang C, Hipp JR, Butts CT, Jose R, Lakon CM (2015) Alcohol use among adolescent youth: the role of friendship networks and family factors in multiple school studies. PLoS ONE 10:e0119965
Warr M (2002) Companions in crime. The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Weerman FM (2011) Delinquent peers in context: a longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology 49:253–286
Wimmer A, Lewis K (2010) Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. Am J Sociol 116:583–642
Wright BRE, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Silva PA (1999) Low self-control, social bonds, and crime: social causation, social selection, or both? Criminology 37:479–514
Young JTN (2011) How do they ‘end up together’? A social network analysis of self-control, homophily, and adolescent relationships. J Quant Criminol 27:251–273