A Narrative Overview of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer

Seminars in Oncology Nursing - Tập 36 - Trang 151045 - 2020
Anthony S. Bates1, Nikolaos Kostakopoulos1, Jennifer Ayers1, Molly Jameson2, James Todd3, Ravi Lukha4, Wojciech Cymes1, Despoina Chasapi5, Nicole Brown5, Yagnaseni Bhattacharya5, Catherine Paterson6, Thomas B.L. Lam1,7
1Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
2Warrington and Halton Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, England, United Kingdom
3Worcester Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, England, United Kingdom
4Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, England, United Kingdom
5University of Aberdeen School of Medicine, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
6University of Canberra, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health, Canberra, Australia
7Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

American Cancer Society. Key statistics for prostate cancer. Available at:https://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostate-cancer/about/key-statistics.html. Accessed May 20, 2020. Cancer Research UK. Prostate cancer statistics. Available at: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/prostate-cancer Uroweb. EAU guidelines: prostate cancer. Available at: https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/. Accessed May 20, 2020. Epstein, 2016, The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system, Am J Surg Pathol, 40, 244, 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530 D'Amico, 1998, Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer, JAMA, 280, 969, 10.1001/jama.280.11.969 Moon, 2006, Cancer incidence after localized therapy for prostate cancer, Cancer, 107, 991, 10.1002/cncr.22083 Donovan, 2016, Patient-reported outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 375, 1425, 10.1056/NEJMoa1606221 Bill-Axelson, 2018, Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in prostate cancer — 29-year follow-up, N Engl J Med, 379, 2319, 10.1056/NEJMoa1807801 Wilt, 2017, Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 377, 132, 10.1056/NEJMoa1615869 Hamdy, 2016, 10-Year Outcomes After Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer, N Engl J Med, 375, 1415, 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220 Schröder, 2009, Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study, N Engl J Med, 360, 1320, 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084 Bryant, 2018, Does the introduction of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging into the active surveillance protocol for localized prostate cancer improve patient re-classification?, BJU Int, 122, 794, 10.1111/bju.14248 Thomsen, 2014, Active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer - a systematic review, J Surg Oncol, 109, 830, 10.1002/jso.23584 Klotz, 2015, Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 33, 272, 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1192 Roemeling, 2007, Active surveillance for prostate cancers detected in three subsequent rounds of a screening trial: characteristics, PSA doubling times, and outcome, Eur Urol, 51, 1244, 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.053 Khatami, 2007, PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: Results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section, Int J Cancer, 120, 170, 10.1002/ijc.22161 Carter, 2007, Expectant management of prostate cancer with curative intent: an update of The Johns Hopkins experience, J Urol, 178, 2359, 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.039 van As, 2008, Predicting the probability of deferred radical treatment for localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance, Eur Urol, 54, 1297, 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.039 Soloway, 2010, Careful selection and close monitoring of low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance minimizes the need for treatment, Eur Urol, 58, 831, 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.027 Adamy, 2011, Role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory biopsy in predicting progression during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer, J Urol, 185, 477, 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.095 Klotz, 2015, Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 33, 272, 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1192 Tosoian, 2015, Intermediate and longer-term outcomes from a prospective active-surveillance program for favorable-risk prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 33, 3379, 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.5764 American Urological Association. Prostate cancer: clinically localized guideline. Available at: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer-clinically-localized-guideline. Accessed May 20, 2020. Federtaie Medisch Specialisten. Prostate cancer - general - guideline - guidelines database. Available at: https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/prostaatcarcinoom/algemeen.html. Accessed May 20, 2020. Selvadurai, 2013, Medium-term outcomes of active surveillance for localised prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 64, 981, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.02.020 El Conocimiento es de todos. Guía de Práctica Clínica Para La Detección Temprana, Diagnóstico, Tratamiento, Seguimiento y Rehabilitación Del Cáncer de Próstata| GPC-2013-21. Available at: www.colciencias.gov.co. Accessed May 20, 2020. AWMF. Detail. Available at: https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/043-022OL.html. Accessed May 20, 2020. Duidecim. Työryhmä. SLD ja SU ry:n asettama. Eturauhassyöpä (online). Helsinki Suom Lääkäris Duodecim (viitattu 13022019) Saatavilla internetissä. Available at: www.kaypahoito.fi. Komisarenko, 2018, Active surveillance review: contemporary selection criteria, followup,compliance and outcomes, Transl Androl Urol, 7, 243, 10.21037/tau.2018.03.02 Weinreb, 2016, PI-RADS prostate imaging - reporting and data system: 2015, Version 2, Eur Urol, 69, 16, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052 Bruinsma, 2018, The Movember Foundation's GAP3 cohort: a profile of the largest global prostate cancer active surveillance database to date, BJU Int, 121, 737, 10.1111/bju.14106 Kalapara, 2020, Adherence to active surveillance protocols for low-risk prostate cancer: results of the Movember Foundation's global action plan prostate cancer active surveillance initiative, Eur Urol Oncol, 3, 80, 10.1016/j.euo.2019.08.014 MacLennan, 2017, A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials, BJU Int, 120, E64, 10.1111/bju.13854 Lam, 2019, EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Prostate Cancer Guideline Panel Consensus Statements for Deferred Treatment with Curative Intent for Localised Prostate Cancer from an International Collaborative study (DETECTIVE study), Eur Urol, 76, 790, 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.020 Evans, 2018, Active surveillance of men with low risk prostate cancer: evidence from the prostate cancer outcomes registrye - Victoria, Med J Aust, 208, 439, 10.5694/mja17.00559 Kinsella, 2018, Factors influencing men's choice of and adherence to active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a mixed-method systematic review, Eur Urol, 74, 261, 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.026 Bellardita, 2015, How does active surveillance for prostate cancer affect quality of life? A systematic review, Eur Urol, 67, 637, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.028 Venderbos, 2015, A longitudinal study on the impact of active surveillance for prostate cancer on anxiety and distress levels, Psychooncology, 24, 348, 10.1002/pon.3657 Dragomir, 2014, Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer compared with immediate treatment: a Canadian cost comparison, CMAJ Open, 2, E60, 10.9778/cmajo.20130037 Keegan, 2012, Active surveillance for prostate cancer compared with immediate treatment: an economic analysis, Cancer, 118, 3512, 10.1002/cncr.26688 Bruinsma, 2017, Expert consensus document: semantics in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer-results of a modified Delphi consensus procedure, Nat Rev Urol, 14, 312, 10.1038/nrurol.2017.26 Ahmed, 2017, Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study, Lancet, 389, 815, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1 Kasivisvanathan, 2018, MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis, N Engl J Med, 378, 1767, 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993 Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety. Modernising nursing careers. Available at: http://www.nursingleadership.org.uk/publications/settingthedirection.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2020. Lewis, 2009, Nurse-led vs. conventional physician-led follow-up for patients with cancer, J Adv Nurs, 65, 706, 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04927.x Oliffe, 2009, The self-management of uncertainty among men undertaking active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer, Qual Health Res, 19, 432, 10.1177/1049732309332692 Nanton, 2017, Integrated Care in Prostate Cancer (ICARE-P): nonrandomized controlled feasibility study of online holistic needs assessment, linking the patient and the health care team, JMIR Res Protoc, 6, e147, 10.2196/resprot.7667 Paterson, 2015, Identifying the unmet supportive care needs of men living with and beyond prostate cancer: a systematic review, Eur J Oncol Nurs, 19, 405, 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.12.007