A Model-Based Approach to Detection Limits in Studying Environmental Exposures and Human Fecundity
Tóm tắt
Human exposure to persistent environmental pollutants often results in concentrations with a range of values below the laboratory detection limits. Growing evidence suggests that inadequate handling of concentrations below the limit of detection (LOD) may bias assessment of health effects in relation to environmental exposures. We seek to quantify such bias in models focusing on the day-specific probability of pregnancy during the fertile window and propose a model-based approach to reduce such bias. A multivariate skewed generalized t-distribution constrained by the LOD is assumed for the chemical concentrations, which realistically represents the underlying distribution. A latent variable-based framework is used to model fecundibility, which nonlinearly relates conception probability to chemical concentrations, daily intercourses, and other important covariates. The advantages of the proposed approach include the use of multiple chemical concentrations to aid the estimation of left censored chemical exposures, as well as the model-based feedback mechanism for fecundibility outcome to inform the estimations, and an adequate handling of model uncertainty through a joint modeling framework. A Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling algorithm is developed for implementing the Bayesian computations and the logarithm of pseudo-marginal likelihood measure is used for model choices. We conduct simulation studies to demonstrate the performance of the proposed approach and apply the framework to the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment study which evaluates the effects of exposures to environmental pollutants on the probability of pregnancy. We found that
$$p,p^{\prime }$$
-DDT is negatively associated with the day-specific probability of pregnancy.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Albert, Chib S (1993) Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. J Am Stat Assoc 88:669–79
Arellano-Valle RB, Bolfarine H (1995) On some characterizations of the t-distribution. Stat Prob Lett 25:79–85
Barett JC, Marshall J (1969) The risk of conception on different days of the menstrual cycle. Popul Stud 23:455–461
Buck Louis GM, Schisterman EF, Sweeney AM, Wilcosky TC, Gore-Langton RE, Lynch CD, Barr DB, Schrader SM, Kim S, Chen Z, Sundaram R (2011) Designing prospective cohort studies for assessing reproductive and developmental toxicity during sensitive Windows of human reproduction and development—LIFE study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 25:413–24
Buck Louis GM, Sundaram R, Schisterman E, Sweeney A, Lynch C, Gore-Langton R, Barr D, Schrader S, Maisog J, Kim S, Chen Z, Barr DB (2013) Persistent environmental pollutants and couple fecundity, the LIFE Study. Environ Health Perspect 121:231–236
Buck GM, Vena JE, Greizerstein HB, Weiner JM, McGuiness B, Mendola P, Kostyniak PJ, Swanson M, Bloom MS, Olson JR (2002) PCB congeners and female fecundity, New York State Angler Cohort Study. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 12:83–92
Browne RW, Whitcomb RW (2010) Procedures for determination of detection limits: application to high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of fat-soluble vitamins in human serum. Epidemiology 21:S4–S9
Cowles C, Carlin BP (1996) Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: a comparative review. J Am Stat Assoc 91:883–904
Dunson DB, Stanford JB (2005) Bayesian inference on predictors of conception probabilities. Biometrics 61:126–133
Hopke PK, Liu C, Rubin DB (2001) Multiple imputation for multivariate data with missing and below-threshold measurements: time-series concentrations of pollutants in the Arctic. Biometrics 57:22–33
Ibrahim JG, Chen M-H, Sinha D (2001) Bayesian survival analysis. Springer, New York
Gini C (1924) Premieres Recherches sur la Fecondabilite de la Femme. Proc Int Math Congr 2:889?92
Kim S, Sundaram R, Buck Louis GM, Pyper C (2012) Flexible Bayesian human Fecundity models (with Discussion). Bayesian Anal 4:771–800
Lum K, Sundaram R, Buck Louis GM, Louis TA (2015) A Bayesian joint model of menstrual cycle length and fecundity. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12379
Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF, Vexler A (2011) ROC curve inference for best linear combination of two biomarkers subject to limits of detection. Biom J 53:464–476
Schisterman EF, Vexler A, Whitcomb BW, Liu A (2006) The limitations due to exposure detection limits for regression models. Am J Epidemiol 163:374–383
Schwartz D, Macdonald PDM, Heuchel V (1980) Fecundability, coital frequency and the viability of ova. Popul Stud 34:397–400
Weinberg CR, Gladen BC, Wilcox AJ (1994) Models relating the timing of intercourse to the probability of conception and the sex of the baby. Biometrics 50:358–367