A Global Look at Time

SAGE Open - Tập 4 Số 1 - Trang 215824401351568 - 2014
Anna Sircova1, Fons J. R. van de Vijver2,3,4, Осин Евгений Николаевич5, Taciano L. Milfont6, Nicolas Fieulaine7, Altinay Kislali-Erginbilgic8, Philip G. Zimbardo9, Slimane Djarallah10, Mohamed Séghir Chorfi11, Umbelina do Rego Leite12, Hui Lin13, Houchao Lv14, Tomislav Bunjevac15, Tena Tomaš15, Jasmina Punek15, Anica Vrlec15, Jelena Matić15, Marko Bokulić15, Martina Klicperová‐Baker16, Jaroslav Koštʹ ál16, Riin Seema17, Arno Baltin17, Thémis Apostolidis18, D. Pediaditakis19, Fay Griva20, Fotios Anagnostopoulos20, Nurit Carmi21, Marina Goroshit21, Martina Peri22, Yumi Shimojima23, Koichi Sato24, Keita Ochi25, Antanas Kairys26, Audronė Liniauskaitė27, Vı́ctor Corral-Verdugo28, Aneta Przepiórka29, Agata Błachnio29, Victor E. C. Ortuño30, Vítor Gamboa31, Olga V. Mitina32, Nadezhda Semyenova32, Valentina Gerasimova33, Tatiana Rawski34, Ekaterina Kuleshova35, N.A. Polskaya36, Nikolaj Tulinov37, Isabella Romanko38, Yulia Semina39, Е. А. Никитина40, V A Yasnaya41,5, Irina Davydova42, Elsa Utyasheva42, Irina Emeliyanova41, Regina V. Ershova43, Jasmina Nedeljković44, Juan Francisco Díaz‐Morales45, Maria Grazia Carelli1, Britt Wiberg1, Ilona Boniwell46, P. Alex Linley47, John N. Boyd48
1Umeå University, Sweden
2North-West University, South Africa
3Tilburg University, the Netherlands
4University of Queensland, Australia
5National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
6Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
7University of Lyon, France
8Istanbul, Turkey
9Stanford University USA
10Université of Batna, Algeria
11Université Ferhat Abbas –Setif, Algeria
12Universidade de Rio Verde, Brasil
13Peking University, China
14Southwest University, China
15University of Zagreb, Croatia
16Institute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
17Tallinn University, Estonia
18Université de Provence, France
19Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Germany
20Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Greece
21Tel-Hai College, Israel
22Salesiana University, Rome, Italy
23Kyorin University, Japan
24Gunma University, Japan
25Hosei University, Japan
26Vilnius University, Lithuania
27Klaipeda University, Lithuania
28Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico
29The John Paul II Catholic University in Lublin, Poland
30Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
31Universidade do Algarve, Portugal
32Moscow State University, Russia
33Kaluga State University of Education, Russia
34Tver State University, russia
35A.I. Gertsen Russian State University of Education, Russia
36Saratov State University, Russia
37Balabanovo branch of Moscow State University of Humanities, Russia
38St Petersburg State University, Russia
39Moscow State Regional University, Russia
40Sociology of Education Center, Russian Academy of Education
41Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Russia
42Russian State University of Humanities, Russia
43Kolomna State Institute of Education, Russia
44Faculty of Law and Business Studies Novi Sad, Serbia
45Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
46University of East London, UK
47Centre for Applied Positive Psychology, UK
48Google Inc., USA

Tóm tắt

In this article, we assess the structural equivalence of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) across 26 samples from 24 countries ( N = 12,200). The ZTPI is proven to be a valid and reliable index of individual differences in time perspective across five temporal categories: Past Negative, Past Positive, Present Fatalistic, Present Hedonistic, and Future. We obtained evidence for invariance of 36 items (out of 56) and also the five-factor structure of ZTPI across 23 countries. The short ZTPI scales are reliable for country-level analysis, whereas we recommend the use of the full scales for individual-level analysis. The short version of ZTPI will further promote integration of research in the time perspective domain in relation to many different psycho-social processes.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/s11205-011-9792-y

10.1016/j.erap.2004.03.001

Ashkanasy N., 2004, Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies, 282

10.1080/17439760903271181

10.1002/9780470939338.ch10

Brislin R. W., 1986, Field methods in cross-cultural research, 137

10.1111/1464-0597.00140

10.1027/1015-5759/a000076

Carmi N., 2014, Megamot—Journal of Behavioral Science, 49

10.1177/0022002187018002002

Corral-Verdugo V., 2006, Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 40, 139

10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.007

Diaz-Morales J. F., 2006, Estructura factorial y fiabilitad del Inventario de Perspectiva Temporal de Zimbardo, 18, 565

Djarallah S., 2009, Arabic Journal of Psychological Science, 23, 53

10.1177/0961463X07086304

10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.006

10.3917/cips.072.0051

Fieulaine N., 2011, The Psychology of Self-Regulation, 102

10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00116-X

Frank L. K., 1939, Journal of Social Philosophy, 4, 293

Hall E. T., 1989, Beyond culture

10.1080/08964280309596051

Harkness J. A., 2003, Cross-cultural survey methods

Hofstede G., 2001, Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, 2

Hofstede G., 2010, Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, 3

10.1080/13602381003637609

10.1007/s11031-006-9018-9

10.1080/01973530902880415

Hoornaert J., 1973, Psychologica Belgica, 13, 265

10.1080/10705519909540118

10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05

Kluckhohn F. R., 1961, Variations in value orientations

Kolesovs A., 2009, Baltic Journal of Psychology, 10, 55

10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.08.006

Leite U. R., 2008, Avaliação Psicológica, 7, 301

Levine R., 1997, A geography of time

10.1177/0022022199030002003

10.1037/13983-004

Liniauskaite A., 2009, Psichologija, 40, 66, 10.15388/Psichol.2009.0.2585

Luhmann N., 2002, Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity, 10.1515/9781503619340

Lukavská K., 2011, Československá psychologie, 55, 356

10.1080/00207590444000041

10.1037/10659-000

Milfont T. L., 2008, Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 42, 49

10.21500/20112084.857

Milfont T. L., 2010, Paper presented at the 20th Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology

10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.001

Muzdybaev K., 2000, Psikholologicheskiy Zhurnal, 21, 5

Kostic A., 2013, Studije vremenskih perspektiva u Srbiji

10.3758/BF03200807

Ortuño V., 2009, Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 27, 21

10.1016/S1057-0810(01)00076-2

Seema R., 2013, Baltic Journal of Psychology, 14, 1

Senyk O., 2012, Соціальна психологія, 85, 153

10.2132/personality.21.74

10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001

Sircova A., 2008, Voprosi Psikhologii, 2, 41

10.17759/chp.2007030403

Sircova A., 2008, Psikhologigesky Journal, 29, 101

10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742.

Trompenaars F., 1998, Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business, 2

10.1177/0961463X10373960

van de Vijver F. J. R., 1997, Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research

10.1007/BF0229355

10.1177/0022022110362746

10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271

Zimbardo P. G., 2008, The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life

Zimbardo P. G., 2012, The time cure: Overcoming PTSD with the new psychology of time perspective therapy

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

SAGE Open

Tập 4 Số 1

215824401351568

Thông tin tác giả