A European public prosecutor: potential and pitfalls

Council Framework Decision of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings (2001/220/JHA). Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (2002/475/JHA). Council Framework Decision of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime. (2008/841/JHA) L-300/42. European Parliament (2011). Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA. House of Lords, Select Committee on the European Communities, Session 1998–99, 9th Report, Prosecuting fraud on the Communities' finances—the Corpus Juris, HL Paper 62; online via the UK Parliament home page at www.parliament.uk. Robledo, A., & Cajani, F. (2009). Public prosecution office Milano Courtroom–Italy, In Policy Department on Budgetary Affairs: Committee on Budgetary Control—the follow-up of the European Anti-Fraud Office´s (OLAF) administrative investigations in Member States, 19 February 2009. 25–27. Jehle, J.-M., & Wade, M. L. (Eds.) (2006). Coping with overloaded criminal justice systems—the rise of prosecutorial power (Springer). COM (2001). 715 final. Green Book on the Protection of the Financial Interests of the Community and the establishment of a European Prosecutor. Brussels 11.12.2001. Wade, M. L., & Jehle, J. M. (Eds.) (2008). ‘Prosecution and diversion within the criminal justice systems in Europe’. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 14(2–3). Schünemann, B. (2004). Fortschritte und Fehltritte in der Strafrechtspflege der EU, Goltdammer´s Archiv für Strafrecht (GA), pp 193–209. Tiedemann, K. (Ed.). (2002). Wirtschaftsstrafrecht in der Europäischen Union. Köln/Berlin/Bonn/München: Carl Heymanns Verlag. Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States–Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the Framework Decision (2002/584/JHA), OJ L 190/1, 18.07.2002. Council Framework Decision of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence. (2003/577/JHA) OJ 2003 l-196/45. Council Framework Decision of 22 October 2004 laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking. (2004/757/JHA) OJ 2004 L-335/8. European Council (2010). Notices from the European Union Institutions, Bodies, Offices and Agencies. European Council. The Stockholm Programme–an open and secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens (2010/C 115/01) O.J. 4.5.2010. C 115/1. Espina Ramos, J. A. I., & Carbajosa, V. (2009). The future European Public Prosecutor's office, Boletín del Estado. Madrid: Ministerio de Justicia. Barnard, C. (2010). “The substantive law of the European Union—the four freedoms”. OUP. Carrera, S. (2012). An Assessment of the Commission’s 2011 Shengen Government Package: Preventing abuse by EU Member States of freedom of movement? Centre for European Policy Studies, No47/March 2012. 1–28. Initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Slovenia and the Kingdom of Sweden for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters Explanatory Memorandum 2010/C 165/02, Official Journal C 165, 24/06/2010 P. 0022 - 0039). Council Decision 2009/426/JHA of 16 December 2008 on the strengthening of Eurojust and amending Decision 2002/187/JHA setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime L-138/14. Council Decision of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol) (2009/371/JHA) L-121/37. COM (2012). 363/2. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law. Brussels XXX. Wade (2011). EuroNEEDS – determining the needs of and the need for a European criminal justice system–preliminary report, available online at: <http://www.mpicc.de/ww/en/prs/forschung/forschungsarbeit/strafrecht/euroneeds.htm. COM (2003). 12 final. Follow up report on the Green Paper on the Criminal-Law protection of the financial interests of the Community and the establishment of a European Prosecutor. Brussels 19.3.2003. Illuminati, G. (2004). ‘The criminal justice system in Italy’. In U. Sieber, M. Wade. Structures for European Criminal Justice, Duencker and Humblot, vol. 3. 2013. In print. COM (2011). 573 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions–towards an EU Criminal Policy: Ensuring the effective implementation of EU policies through criminal law. Brussels, 20.9.2011. Wade (2013). The defence and the legitimacy of European criminal justice. Journal of European Criminal Law. In print. Delmas-Marty, M. (Ed.) (1998). Corpus Juris der strafrechtlichen Regelungen zum Schutz der finanziellen Interessen der Europäischen Union. Köln/Berlin/Bonn/München. Spencer, J. (2012). Who’s afraid of the big, bad European Public Prosecutor. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. In press and on file with author. Herlin-Karnell, E. (2008). The Lisbon Treaty and the Area of Criminal Law and Justice, Sieps European Policy Analysis, Issue 3-2008. Van den Wyngaert, C. (2004). Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor in the Corpus Juris Model: Water and fire?. In N. Walker (2004), Europe’s Area of Freedom Security and Justice (pp 201–239). (OUP). Zwiers, M. (2011). The European public prosecutor's office–analysis of a multilevel criminal justice system, Intersentia, 2011. House of Lords Select Committee on the European Union (2003–04). Twenty-third report. House of Lords Select Committee on European Scrutiny (2002). Twenty-sixth report. Wade, M. (2013). “Part III–present national criminal justice structures”. In U. Sieber, M. Wade (2013), “Structures of European Criminal Justice–volume 1: Central findings” Duncker and Humblot. In print. Vervaele, J. (2009). From Eurojust to the European Prosecution Service in the European Judicial Area. The beginning of a European Criminal Procedural Law. In J. A. E. Ramos, V. I. Carbajosa. ‘The future European Public Prosecutor’s Office, Fiscalía General del Estado, 2009’ (pp 125–162) OLAF (2007). Report of the European Anti-Fraud Office, Summary Version, Eighth Activity Report for the period 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007, Luxembourg 2008. House of Lords Select Committee F 9th Report 2006–2007 Schengen Information System II: Report with Evidence, at 7–8, available at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldselect/ldeucom/49/49.pdf. Wade, M. L. (2009). The future of borders. In J. A. Winterdyk & K. W. Sundberg (Eds.), “Border Security in the Al-Qaeda Era”, Boca Raton [et al.] (pp. 349–364). New York: CRC Press. Roma, M. (2004). A European Public Prosecutor would be a dangerous distraction, CER Bulletin, Issue 35, April/May. Available at <http://www.cer.org.uk/publications/archive/bulletin-article/2004/european-public-prosecutor-would-be-dangerous-distraction> Date accessed 19/09/2012. Vervaele, J. A. E. (2008a). 'Future of European Criminal Law and Harmonization of Criminal Law Enforcement' lecture at the Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, 8th March 2008. Bundesrat (2011). Beschluss des Bundesrates, Drucksache 334/11 (the position of the Bundesrat on the Communication from the Commission on the Protection of the financial interests of the European Union by criminal law and by administrative investigations (Berlin, 8 July 2011)) available at: http://www.bundesrat.de/cln_152/SharedDocs/Drucksachen/2011/0301-400/334-11_28B_29,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/334-11. White, S. (2002). The European prosecutor: extension of eurojust or “prolongation” of the corpus juris proposals? In G. de Kerchove, A. Weyembergh (2002), L’espace penal europeen: Enjeux et perspectives (pp 47–53). University of Brussels. Tampere European Council 15 and 16 October 1999–presidency conclusions, pp 33–37. COM (2011). 175 final. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation since 2007 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States. Brussels 11.4.2011. Suominen, A. (2008). The past, present and future of Eurojust. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 15(2), 217–239. Xanthaki, H. (2010). What is EU fraud? and can OLAF really combat it? Journal of Financial Crime, 17(1), 133–151. House of Lords European Union Committee, The Treaty of Lisbon: An Impact Assessment, pp 142–143. Mitsilegas, V. (2009). EU criminal law: Modern studies in EU criminal law. Hart. Hodgson, J. (2005). French criminal justice: A comparative account of the investigation and prosecution of crime in France. Hart. Tak, P. (Ed.). (2004). Tasks and powers of the prosecution services in the EU Member States. Nijmegen: Wolf. Tak, P. (Ed.). (2005). Tasks and powers of the prosecution services in the EU Member States volume II. Nijmegen: Wolf. Lewis, C. (2006). ‘The prosecution service function within the English Criminal justice system’. In J.-M. Jehle, M. L. Wade (Eds.), Coping with overloaded criminal justice systems—the rise of prosecutorial power. Springer (pp 151–184). Aubusson de Cavarlay, B. (2006). ‘The prosecution service function within the French criminal justice system’. In J.-M. Jehle, M. L. Wade (Eds.), Coping with overloaded criminal justice systems—the rise of prosecutorial power. Springer (pp 185–206). Elsner, B., & Peters, J. (2006). ‘The prosecution service function within the German criminal justice system. In J.-M. Jehle, M. L. Wade (Eds.), Coping with overloaded criminal justice systems—the rise of prosecutorial power. Springer (pp 207–236). Blom, M., & Smit, P. (2006). ‘The prosecution service function within the Dutch criminal justice system’. In J.-M. Jehle, M. L. Wade (Eds.), Coping with overloaded criminal justice systems—the rise of prosecutorial power. Springer (pp 237–256). Zila, J. (2006). ‘The prosecution service function within the Swedish criminal justice system’. In J.-M. Jehle, M. L. Wade (Eds.), Coping with overloaded criminal justice systems—the rise of prosecutorial power. Springer (pp 285–314). Turković, K. (2008). The prosecution service function within the Croatian criminal justice system’. In M. Wade, J. M. Jehle (Eds.), ‘Prosecution and diversion within the criminal justice systems in Europe’ 14(2–3) European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research (pp 263–288). Róth, E. (2008). ‘The prosecution service function within the Hungarian criminal justice system’. In M. Wade, J. M. Jehle (Eds.), ‘Prosecution and diversion within the criminal justice systems in Europe’ 14(2–3) European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research (pp 289–310). Aebi, M. F., & Balcells, M. (2008). ‘The prosecution service function within the Spanish criminal justice system’. In M. Wade, J. M. Jehle (Eds.), ‘Prosecution and diversion within the criminal justice systems in Europe’ 14(2–3) European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research (pp 311–332). Gilliéron, G., & Killias, M. (2008). ‘The prosecution service function within the Swiss criminal justice system’. In M. Wade, J. M. Jehle (Eds.), ‘Prosecution and diversion within the criminal justice systems in Europe’ 14(2–3) European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 2008, 333–352. Hakeri, H. (2008). ‘The prosecution service function within the Turkish criminal justice system’. In M. Wade, J. M. Jehle (Eds.), ‘Prosecution and diversion within the criminal justice systems in Europe’ 14(2–3) European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 2008, 353–368. Wade (2006). The power to decide–prosecutorial control, diversion and punishment in European criminal justice systems today. In J.-M. Jehle, M. Wade. Coping with overloaded criminal justice systems, Springer (pp 27–126). Donoghue, B. (2008). European public prosecutor: Will it happen? speech at the Law Society Annual Conference, Budapest, March 2008. COM (2011). 293 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the protection of the financial interests of the European Union by criminal law and by administrative investigations. An integrated policy to safeguard taxpayers' money. Brussels. 26.5.2011. OLAF (2012). Report of the European Anti-Fraud Office 2011. <Available at http://ec.europa.eu/anti_fraud/documents/reports-olaf/2011/olaf_report_2011.pdf> accessed on 17/09/2012. Savona, E. (2006). ‘Measuring organised crime: An international perspective’ in UNODC forum on Crime and Society, Special Issue, “improving knowledge on crime: towards better data”. 5(1)& (2), 21–34. Van Duyne, P. C. (2010). ‘Organised crime (threat) as a policy challenge: A tautology. In ‘Organised crime, civil society and the policy process’ Conference Proceedings, Risk Monitor Foundation May 2010. Jehle, J.-M. (2006). The “function of public prosecution within the criminal justice system–aim, approach and outcome of a European Comparative Study”. In J.-M. Jehle, M. L. Wade (Eds.) (2006), Coping with overloaded criminal justice systems—the rise of prosecutorial power. Springer. Wade, M. (2008). The Januses of Justice–how prosecutors define the kind of justice done across Europe. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 16(4), 433–455. Luna, E., & Wade, M. (2010). Prosecutors as judges. In Washington and Lee Law Review. Vol 67/Issue 4 2010 (pp 1413–1532). Model Rules for the European Public Prosecutor available at http://www.eppo-project.eu/index.php/EU-model-rules/english. COM (2005). 583 final/2. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implications of the Court’s judgment of 13 September 2005 (Case C-176/03 Commission v Council) Brussels, 24.11.2005. Council Decision of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (2002/187/JHA), OJ L 63/1, 06.03.2002. Wade, M. (2013). “Part II–Institutions and Quasi-Institutions of Current European Criminal Justice Structures” in Sieber/Wade Structures for European Criminal Justice, Duncker and Humblot, 2013. In print. Neuhann, F. (2008/2009). Europa–Paradies fuer Betrueger? in Jahrbuch fuer Oeffentliche Sicherheit, 533–541. Xanthaki, H., White, S., Stefanou, C. (2011). OLAF at the crossroads–action against EU fraud. (Hart). Ashworth, A., & Roberts, J. (2012). ‘Sentencing: Theory, principle and practice’. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (OUP) (pp 866–894). Vervaele, J. (2008). The shaping and reshaping of Eurojust and OLAF in eucrim 3–4/2008. Braum, S. (2002). Europaeisches Strafrecht im administrativen Rechtsstil in ZRP 12/2002. 508–514. Hecker, B. (2010). Europaeisches Strafrecht, 3rd ed. Springer. Radtke, H. (2004). Der Europaeische Staatsanwalt–Ein Modell fuer Strafverfolgung in Europa mit Zukunft, in GA pp 1–21. Costa, J. (2004). Eurojust vis-à-vis the European Public Prosecutor. In J. Apap (2004), Justice and home affairs in the EU. Edward Elgar Press. Brady, H. (2010). Does the EU need a public prosecutor? CER Bulletin, Issue 70, February/March. <http://www.cer.org.uk/publications/archive/bulletin-article/2010/does-eu-need-public-prosecutor> date accessed 20/09/12. Sätzger, A. (2003). Gefahren fuer eine effective Verteidigung im geplannten europaeischen Verfahrensrecht, in StV 2/2003, pp 137–142. White, S. (2010). EU anti-fraud enforcement: overcoming obstacles. Journal of Financial Crime, 17(1), 81–99. Suhr, O. (2009). Die polizeiliche und justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen nach dem “Lissabon”-Urteils des Bundesverfassungsgerichts in ZEuS, 4/2009, pp 687–715. Nieto, A., Wade, M., Morales, M. (2012). “Prosecutors in federal structures”–transversal report in Ligetti, K. “Criminal Investigations in the EU” Hart, 2012. In print. Sätzger, A. (2010). Internationales und Europaeisches Strafrecht (4th ed.). Baden Baden: Nomos. Finjaut, C. (2008). Introduction in EJCCJ&CL 2. von Bogdandy, A. (2010). Founding principles. In A von Bogdandy, J. Bast (2010), Principles of European Constitutional Law (2nd ed.), (pp 11–54) Hart/C.H. Beck/Nomos. Carter, C., & Scott, A. (1998). Legitimacy and governance beyond the European Nation State: conceptualising governance in the European Union. European Law Journal, 4(4), 429–445. Hassemer, W. (2004). Strafrecht in einem europaeischen Verfassungsvertrag in ZStW 116 (2004) 2, pp 304–319. Klip, A. (2009). European Criminal Law. Intersentia. Moran Martinez, R. A. (2009). Contribution to round table III. In J. A. Espina Ramos & I. Vicente Carbajosa (Eds.), The future European Public Prosecutor's office, Boletín del Estado (pp. 106–116). Madrid: Ministerio de Justicia. Lopes de la Motta, J. L. (2008). Eurojust—the heart of the future European Public Prosecutor’s office in Eucrim 1–2/2008. Ambos, K. (2011). Internationales Strafrecht, 3rd ed. Beck. Cocobu Info (2011). Issue 3/2011 available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201101/20110121ATT12212/20110121ATT12212EN.pdf (last download 24 August 2012). European Parliament (2012). Resolution of 10 May 2012 on the protection of the European Union's financial interests–fight against fraud–annual report 2010 (2011/2154(INI) available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-196. Frank, C. (2002). Der Europaeische Staatsanwalt: ein denkbares Modell in DriZ. Bulenda, T., Gruszczynska, B., Kremplewski, A., Sobota, P. (2006). ‘The prosecution service function within the Polish criminal justice system’. In J.-M. Jehle, M. L. Wade (Eds.), Coping with overloaded criminal justice systems—the rise of prosecutorial power (Springer) (pp 257–284) Springer. COM (2003). 128 final. Follow-up report on the Green Paper on the criminal-law protection of the financial interests of the Community and the establishment of a European Prosecutor. Brussels 19.3.2003. COM (2007). 664 final. Communication on the Future of Eurojust and the European Judicial Network. Brussels 23.10.2007. COM (2011). 135 final. Amended proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing regulation. Council Act of 29 May 2000 establishing in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union the Convention on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union OJ (2000/C197/01). Council of the European Union Inter-institutional File: 2010/0817 (COD). Outcome of Proceedings of: Working Party on Cooperation in Criminal Matters. Subject: Initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Slovenia and the Kingdom of Sweden for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters- Preamble, forms and annex related to Article 29.1. COPEN 104. Deiters, M. (2006). Legalitätsprinzip und Normgeltung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. European Commission Corpus Juris (2000). Available at <http://ec.europa.eu/anti_fraud/documents/fwk-green-paper-corpus/corpus_juris_en.pdf> date accessed 24/10/2012. Hecker, B. (2007). Europäisches Strafrecht, 2. Auflage. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer. Hofmann, M. (2006). Straftatbestände und Sanktionen zum Schutz der finanziellen Interessen der EU: Die Umsetzung der einschlägigen EU-Rechtsinstrumente in den Mitgliedstaaten. In Z. Đurđević (Ed.), Current issues in European Criminal Law and the protection of EU financial interests, Zagreb. Ramos, J. A. E. Towards a European Public Prosecutor’s office: The long and winding road. In A. Klip (Ed.), “Substantive criminal law of the European Union”(Maklu) (pp 15–34). Tiedemann, K. Leipziger Kommentar zum StGB, §§ 223–263a, 11. Auflage 2000. Wade, M. (2009). ‘The European public prosecutor—the future of European criminal justice’. In F. Yenisey, U. Sieber (Eds.), Criminal law in the global risk society (pp 299–310) Bahcesehir Universitesi.