A DUAL‐SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TO PROCESSES OF PEER INFLUENCE

Criminology - Tập 51 Số 2 - Trang 435-474 - 2013
Kyle J. Thomas1, Jean Marie McGloin1
1Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Maryland

Tóm tắt

The distinct peer‐based perspectives of deviant normative influence and unstructured/unsupervised socializing with friends contend that adolescents rely on different information when deciding to offend, with the former positing that individuals offend after considering the longer term consequences of behavior, and the latter positing that decisions to offend derive from situational stimuli. We argue that these processes can be organized under a dual‐systems framework of decision making, which leads to the hypothesis that individuals at the edges of impulsivity should be differentially vulnerable to these peer influence processes because of their tendency to rely on only one system of decision making. We use two large data sets to test this hypothesis: a nationally representative sample of adolescents from the AddHealth study (N = ∼9,000) and a pooled panel data set of adolescents from the Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) evaluation (N = 1,172). The results of longitudinal negative binomial analyses indicate that normative influence by deviant peers has a stronger effect on delinquency for adolescents with low impulsivity than it does for individuals with high impulsivity. Differences in the informal socializing with peers coefficients are less clear and offer minimal support for our predictions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/800819

Akers Ronald L., 1985, Social learning theory and adolescent cigarette smoking, Social Problems, 32, 455, 10.2307/800775

10.2307/1143850

Akers Ronald L., 1998, Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance

Akers Ronald L., 2006, Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory

10.1177/0022427808326587

Anderson Elijah, 1999, Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City

10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00116.x

10.1080/07418825.2011.597417

10.1007/s10964-006-9075-0

10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00428.x

10.1177/0093854808326992

10.1080/07418820100095011

10.1146/annurev.so.19.080193.000553

Block Jeanne H., 1980, Development of Cognition, Affect and Social Relations: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology

10.2307/799304

10.1207/s15327957pspr0904_2

Chantala Kim, 1999, Strategies to Perform a Design‐based Analysis Using the AddHealth Data

10.2307/2094589

10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.95

10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00273.x

10.1017/S0954579400006854

10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00652.x

10.1037/h0034679

Esbensen Finn‐Aage, 2003, Evaluation of the Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) Program in the United States, 1995–1999

10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629

Evans Jonathon St. B. T., 1996, Rationality and Reasoning

Fletcher Jason M. ParthaDeb andJody L.Sindelar.2009.Tobacco use taxation and self‐control. Working Paper.

Freud Sigmund, 1930, New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis

10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.005

10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1198

Gallupe Owen, 2010, Crime and Delinquency

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1062-06.2006

10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625

10.1007/s10802-007-9176-6

10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00185-3

10.1515/9781503621794

10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00061-1

10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00135.x

10.1086/320298

10.1353/sof.2006.0018

10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00487.x

10.2307/2095939

Hirschi Travis, 1969, Causes of Delinquency

Hirschi Travis, 1989, Theoretical Integration in the Study of Deviance and Crime: Problems and Prospects

10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x

10.1080/17437190802617668

10.1016/0306-4603(87)90017-7

James William, 1890, The Principles of Psychology

10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697

Kahneman Daniel, 2011, Thinking Fast and Slow

10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004

Kahneman Daniel, 2005, The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning

10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80006-5

10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00105.x

10.1086/229940

10.2307/2095837

10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140752

10.1126/science.1100907

10.1177/0022427808326585

10.1177/0022427810393019

McGloin Jean M., 2012, When Crime Appears: The Role of Emergence

10.2307/3822971

10.1177/0022427898035003001

10.1177/0022427809335171

10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3

10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674

10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00269.x

10.2307/3054102

10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00985.x

10.1007/s10940-004-5866-1

10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00528.x

10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00079.x

10.1023/A:1016008004010

10.2307/2096397

10.3758/BF03196730

10.1353/ppp.2001.0013

10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x

10.1007/s10940-009-9065-y

10.1007/s10940-010-9095-5

Piquero Alex R., 2005, Integrated Developmental & Life‐Course Theories of Offending: Advances in Criminological Theory

10.1177/002242780203900202

10.1080/07418829600093061

10.1080/07418820200095301

10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00515.x

10.1007/s10940-006-9019-6

10.1080/07418820903379610

10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x

10.1007/BF01066835

10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.157

10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147

10.1080/016396290968326

10.1007/s10940-006-9014-y

10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3

Stanovich Keith E., 1998, Individual differences in rational thought, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 127, 161, 10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.161

10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002

10.1002/dev.20445

10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1

Sutherland Edwin H., 1947, Principles of Criminology

10.1177/0093854810366542

10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.213

Thomas Kyle J., 2013, Law and Human Behavior

10.1086/229734

10.1007/s10862-009-9160-2

10.2307/800603

10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01120.x

10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01246.x

10.1017/CBO9780511803956

10.1017/CBO9780511489341

Wooldridge Jeffrey M., 2001, Econometric of Cross‐section and Panel Data

10.1177/0022427803260263

10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00925.x

10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00232.x

10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00237.x