A Critical Review of Home Range Studies

Journal of Wildlife Management - Tập 72 Số 1 - Trang 290-298 - 2008
Peter N. Laver1, Marcella J. Kelly2
1Mogalakwena Research Centre, P.O. Box 60, Alldays, 0909, South Africa
2Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, 210B Cheatham Hall, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0321, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract No consensus currently exists for the methods of estimation of home range size or for reporting home‐range analysis results. Studies currently employ a variety of disparate methods or provide inadequate information for reproducing their analyses. We reviewed 161 home range studies published in 2004, 2005, and 2006 to assess what methods are currently employed and how results are reported. We found that home range reporting was generally inadequate for reproducing studies; that the methods employed varied considerably; that home range estimates were often reported and analyzed using inappropriate methods; and that many comparisons were made between studies that may produce spurious results. We urge for minimum editorial standards for reporting home range studies and we urge researchers to follow a unified methodology for estimating animal home ranges. We supply recommendations for such reporting and methodology. These recommendations will increase the reproducibility of studies and allow for more robust comparisons between studies.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.3758/BF03201046

10.1016/0022-1910(79)90112-4

10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0469:LHREOS]2.0.CO;2

10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01164.x

10.2307/3809048

10.1080/00949658508810822

10.2307/1374834

Calhoun J. B., 1958, Calculation of home range and a density of small mammals, United States Public Health Monograph, 55, 1

10.1137/1114019

10.1890/06-0930

Garshelis D. L., 2000, Research techniques in animal ecology, 111

10.2307/2404192

10.2307/3545648

Gitzen R. A., 2003, Comparison of least‐squares cross‐validation bandwidth options for kernel home‐range estimation, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 31, 814

10.2307/3802583

10.1111/j.1365-2907.1990.tb00106.x

10.2307/1375189

10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00944.x

Hooge P. N., 2000, Animal movement extension to ArcView version 2.0

10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[641:LCVLSC]2.0.CO;2

10.1080/01621459.1996.10476701

10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.11.001

10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1905:DALEOH]2.0.CO;2

Kenward R. E., 1996, Ranges V. An analysis system for biological location data

Kenward R. E., 2002, RANGES VI

10.1016/B978-012497781-5/50006-2

Kie J. G., 1996, CALHOME: a program for estimating animal home ranges, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 24, 342

10.2307/1938381

Larkin R. P., 1994, A review of software packages for estimating animal home ranges, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 22, 274

10.1016/B978-012497781-5/50017-7

Laver P. N.2005.Cheetah of the Serengeti Plains: a home range analysis.Thesis Virginia Tech Blacksburg USA.

Lawson E. J. G., 1997, Differences in home‐range size computed in commonly used software programs, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 721

Messmer T. A., 2006, Unified manuscript guidelines for The Wildlife Society peer‐reviewed publications, Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 304

10.2307/3802819

Powell R. A., 2000, Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences, 65

10.1071/WR04117

10.1111/j.1365-2664.1998.tb00010.x

Rodgers A. R., 1998, HRE: the Home Range Extension for ArcViewTM: user's manual

10.2307/5112

10.2307/4373

Seaman D. E., 1998, KERNELHR: a program for estimating animal home ranges, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26, 95

10.2307/3802664

Seaman D. E., 1990, Identifying patterns and intensity of home range use, International Conference on Bear Research and Management, 8, 243

10.2307/2265701

10.5962/bhl.title.68294

10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9

10.2307/1937590

10.2307/1376067

10.2307/1939170

10.2307/3801388

10.2307/1400640

10.2307/1940437

10.2307/3800474

10.1016/0304-3800(87)90101-3

10.2307/1938423

10.1080/00949658908811152

10.2307/3801959