A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score

European Urology - Tập 69 Số 3 - Trang 428-435 - 2016
Jonathan I. Epstein1, Michael J. Zeléfsky2, Daniel D. Sjoberg2, Joel B. Nelson3, Lars Egevad4, Cristina Magi‐Galluzzi5, Andrew J. Vickers2, Anil V. Parwani3, Victor E. Reuter2, Samson W. Fine2, James A. Eastham2, Peter Wiklund4, Misop Han1, C.A. Reddy5, Jay P. Ciezki5, Tommy Nyberg4, Eric A. Klein5
1The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD USA
2Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
3University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh PA USA
4Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
5Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Gleason, 1974, Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging, J Urol, 111, 58, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59889-4

Epstein, 2005, ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma, Am J Surg Pathol, 29, 1228, 10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1

Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol. In press.

Pierorazio, 2013, Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system, BJU Int, 111, 753, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x

Spratt, 2014, Comparison of high-dose (86.4Gy) IMRT vs combined brachytherapy plus IMRT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer, BJU Int, 114, 360, 10.1111/bju.12514

Videtic, 2014

Resnick, 2013, Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 368, 436, 10.1056/NEJMoa1209978

Wilt, 2012, Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 367, 203, 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162

Bill-Axelson, 2014, Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 370, 932, 10.1056/NEJMoa1311593

D’Amico, 1998, Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer, JAMA, 280, 969, 10.1001/jama.280.11.969

Chan, 2000, Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy, Urology, 56, 823, 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00753-6

Stark, 2009, Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3+4=4+3?, J Clin Oncol, 27, 3459, 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4669

Tsao, 2015, Patients with biopsy Gleason 9 and 10 prostate cancer have significantly worse outcomes compared with Gleason 8 disease, J Urol, 194, 91, 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.078

Mellinger, 1977, Prognosis of prostatic carcinoma, Recent Results Cancer Res, 60, 61, 10.1007/978-3-642-81095-4_6

Danneman, 2015, Gleason inflation 1998-2011: a registry study of 97 168 men, BJU Int, 115, 248, 10.1111/bju.12671

McNeal, 1996, Spread of adenocarcinoma within prostatic ducts and acini. Morphologic and clinical correlations, Am J Surg Pathol, 20, 802, 10.1097/00000478-199607000-00003

Ross, 2012, Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with Gleason score (GS) </=6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes?, Am J Surg Pathol, 36, 1346, 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182556dcd

Kweldam, 2015, Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer, Mod Pathol, 28, 457, 10.1038/modpathol.2014.116

Nakabayashi, 2013, Clinical predictors of survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: evidence that Gleason score 6 cancer can evolve to lethal disease, Cancer, 119, 2990, 10.1002/cncr.28102

Esserman, 2014, Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change, Lancet Oncol, 15, e234, 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70598-9

Berman, 2014, When is prostate cancer really cancer?, Urol Clin North Am, 41, 339, 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.01.006

Carter, 2012, Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma: should it be labeled as cancer?, J Clin Oncol, 30, 4294, 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.0586

Nelson, 2014, Observation for clinically localized prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 32, 1295, 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.2043

Epstein, 2012, Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades, Eur Urol, 61, 1019, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.050

Brockman, 2015, Nomogram predicting prostate cancer-specific mortality for men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 67, 1160, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.019

Freedland, 2005, Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, JAMA, 294, 433, 10.1001/jama.294.4.433

Trock, 2009, Tertiary Gleason patterns and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: proposal for a modified Gleason scoring system, J Urol, 182, 1364, 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.048

Cronin, 2010, Definition of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy does not substantially impact prognostic factor estimates, J Urol, 183, 984, 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.027

Nielsen, 2008, Is it possible to compare PSA recurrence-free survival after surgery and radiotherapy using revised ASTRO criterion--“nadir + 2”?, Urology, 72, 389, 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.053

Lee, 2015, Are biochemical recurrence outcomes similar after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy? Analysis of prostate cancer-specific mortality by nomogram-predicted risks of biochemical recurrence, Eur Urol, 67, 204, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.017