A Comparison of Quality Outcome Measures in Patients Having a Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: Robotic vs. Non-robotic Approaches

Hackbarth, 2008, Collective accountability for medical care: toward bundled Medicare payments, N Engl J Med, 359, 3, 10.1056/NEJMp0803749 Henretta, 2011, The revolving door: hospital readmissions of gynecologic oncology patients, Gynecol Oncol, 122, 479, 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.011 Epstein, 2009, Revisiting readmission: changing the incentives for shared accountability, N Engl J Med, 360, 1457, 10.1056/NEJMe0901006 Jencks, 2009, Rehospitalization among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program, N Engl J Med, 360, 1418, 10.1056/NEJMsa0803563 Jacobson, 2006, Hysterectomy rates for benign indications, Obstet Gynecol, 107, 1278, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000210640.86628.ff Warren, 2009, Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 16, 581, 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018 Wright, 2013, Robotically assisted vs laparo-scopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease, JAMA, 309, 689, 10.1001/jama.2013.186 Elixhauser, 1998, Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative Data, Medical Care, 36, 8, 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004 2009, Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444, Obstet Gynecol, 114, 1156, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72 Adeyemo, 2007, Unplanned general surgical re-admission: how many, which patients and why?, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 89, 363, 10.1308/003588407X183409