A Comparison of Physical Therapy Protocols Between Open Latarjet Coracoid Transfer and Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Sports Health - Tập 12 Số 2 - Trang 124-131 - 2020
Alexander Beletsky1, Jourdan M. Cancienne2, Brady T. Williams1, Nabil Mehta1, Kevin E. Wilk3, Nikhil N. Verma1
1Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
2Southern Orthopaedic Specialists New Orleans, Louisiana
3Champion Sports Medicine, American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama

Tóm tắt

Context:

Recent studies examining return to sport after traumatic shoulder instability suggest faster return-to-sport time lines after bony stabilization when compared with soft tissue stabilization. The purpose of the current study was to define variability across online Latarjet rehabilitation protocols and to compare Latarjet with Bankart repair rehabilitation time lines.

Evidence Acquisition:

Online searches were utilized to identify publicly available rehabilitation protocols from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)–accredited academic orthopaedic surgery programs.

Study Design:

Descriptive epidemiology study.

Level of Evidence:

Level 3.

Results:

Of the 183 ACGME-accredited orthopaedic programs reviewed, 14 institutions (7.65%) had publicly available rehabilitation protocols. A web-based search yielded 17 additional protocols from private sports medicine practices. Of the 31 protocols included, 31 (100%) recommended postoperative sling use and 26 (84%) recommended elbow, wrist, and hand range of motion exercises. Full passive forward flexion goals averaged 3.22 ± 2.38 weeks postoperatively, active range of motion began on average at 5.22 ± 1.28 weeks, and normal scapulothoracic motion by 9.26 ± 4.8 weeks postoperatively. Twenty (65%) protocols provided specific recommendations for return to nonoverhead sport–specific activities, beginning at an average of 17 ± 2.8 weeks postoperatively. This was compared with overhead sports or throwing activities, for which 18 (58%) of protocols recommended beginning at a similar average of 17.1 ± 3.3 weeks.

Conclusion:

Similar to Bankart repair protocols, Latarjet rehabilitation protocols contain a high degree of variability with regard to exercises and motion goal recommendations. However, many milestones and start dates occur earlier in Latarjet protocols when compared with Bankart-specific protocols. Consequently, variability in the timing of rehabilitation goals may contribute to earlier return to play metrics identified in the broader literature for the Latarjet procedure when compared with arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT):

Level C.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/0363546518780934

10.1177/0363546515574677

10.1177/2325967117712476

10.1177/0269215514539819

10.1177/1941738117750553

10.2106/JBJS.15.01478

10.1302/2058-5241.3.180028

10.1080/00913847.2015.1005543

10.1093/milmed/usx077

10.2519/jospt.2010.3186

10.1177/2325967117726055

10.2106/00004623-200611000-00002

10.1007/s11999-014-3589-7