So sánh giữa hồi quy logistic, cây phân loại và hồi quy, và mô hình mạng nơ-ron trong dự đoán tái phạm bạo lực

SPSS Inc. (2008) SPSS for windows, Rel. 16.0.1. 2008. SPSS Inc., Chicago. http://www.spss.com/ StatSoft Inc. (2008) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0. http://www.statsoft.com Banks S, Robbins PC, Silver E, Vesselinov R, Steadman HJ, Monahan J (2004) A multiple-models approach to violence risk assessment among people with mental disorder. Crim Justice Behav 31:324–340 Bigi R, Gregori D, Cortigiani L, Desideri A, Chiarotto FA, Toffolo GM (2005) Artificial neural networks and robust Bayesian classifiers for risk stratification following uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 101:481–487 Bishop C (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, New York Breiman L (2001) Decision tree forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32 Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA Brodzinski JD, Crable EA, Scherer RF (1994) Using artificial intelligence to model juvenile recidivism patterns. Comput Hum Serv 10:1–18 Caulkins J, Cohen J, Gorr W, Wei J (1996) Predicting criminal recidivism: a comparison of neural network models with statistical methods. J Crim Just 24:227–240 Cicchetti DV (1992) Neural network and diagnosis in the clinical laboratory: state of the art. Clin Chem 38:9–10 Cohen J (1990) Things I have learned (so far). Am Psychol 45:1304–1312 Coid JW, Yang M, Ullrich S, Zhang TQ, Sizmur S, Farrington DP (2010) Improving accuracy of risk prediction for violence: does changing the outcome matter? Int J Offender Ther (Submitted) Coid JW, Yang M, Ullrich S, Zhang TQ, Sizmur S, Roberts C, Farrington DP (2011) Most items in structured risk assessment instruments do not predict violence. J Forensic Psychiatr Psychol 22. doi:10.1080/14789949.2010.495990 Colombet I, Ruelland A, Chatellier G, Gueyffier F, Degoulet P, Jaulent MC (2000) Models to predict cardiovascular risk: comparison of CART, multilayer perceptron and logistic regression. In: Proceedings/AMIA annual symposium. AMIA symposium 2000, pp 156–160 Comp.ai.neural-nets FAQ, Part 3: Generalization. http://www.faqs.org/faqs/ai-faq/neural-nets/part3/preamble.html Cooke DJ, Michie C, Ryan J (2001) Evaluating risk for violence: a preliminary study of the HCR-20, PCL-R and VRAG in a Scottish prison sample. Scottish Prison Service occasional papers Dahle KP (2006) Strengths and limitations of actuarial prediction of criminal reoffence in a German prison sample: a comparative study of LSI-R, HCR-20 and PCL-R. Int J Law Psychiat 29:431–442 Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE (1989) Clinical versus actuarial judgement. Science 243:1668–1674 Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N (1983) The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med 13:595–605 Dillard E, Luchette FA, Sears BW, Norton J, Schermer CR, Reed RL (2007) Clinician vs mathematical statistical models: which is better at predicting an abnormal chest radiograph finding in injured patients? Am J Emerg Med 25:823–830 Dolan M, Khawaja A (2004) The HCR-20 and post-discharge outcome in male patients discharged from medium security in the UK. Aggress Behav 30:469–483 Douglas KS, Ogloff JRP, Nicholls TL, Grant I (1999) Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the psychopathy checklist: screening version. J Consult Clin Psych 67:917–930 Doyle M, Dolan M (2006) Predicting community violence from patients discharged from mental health services. Brit J Psychiat 189:520–526 Farrington DP, Jolliffe D, Johnstone L (2008) Assessing violence risk: a framework for practice. Institute of Criminology, Cambridge University, Cambridge Florio T, Einfeld S, Levy F (1994) Neural networks and psychiatry: candidate applications in clinical decision making. Aust NZ J Psychiat 28:651–666 Forthofer MS, Bryant CA (2000) Using audience-segmentation techniques to tailor health behavior change strategies. Am J Health Behav 24:36–43 Friedman JH (1999a) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. IMS 1999 Reitz Lecture Friedman JH (1999b) Stochastic gradient boosting. Stanford University, Stanford Gardner W, Lidz CW, Mulvey EP, Shaw EC (1996) A comparison of actuarial methods for identifying repetitively violent patients with mental illnesses. Law Human Behav 20:35–48 Gendreau P, Goggin C, Smith P (2002) Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Crim Justice Behav 29:397–426 Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, Group AR (1999) Simple heuristics that makes us smart. Oxford University Press, New York Glover A, Nicholson D, Hemmati T, Bernfeld G, Quinsey V (2002) A comparison of predictors of general and violent recidivism among high risk federal offenders. Crim Justice Behav 29:235–249 Gottfredson SD, Moriarty LJ (2006) Statistical risk assessment: old problems and new applications. Crime Delinquency 52:178–200 Grann M, Langstrom N (2007) Actuarial Assessment of Violence Risk: To Weigh or Not to Weigh? Crim Justice Behav 34:22–36 Gray NS, Hill C, McGleish A, Timmons D, MacCulloch MJ, Snowden RJ (2003) Prediction of violence and self-harm in mentally disordered offenders: a prospective study of the efficacy of HCR-20, PCL-R and psychiatric symptomology. J Consult Clin Psych 71:443–451 Gray NS, Taylor J, Snowden RJ (2008) Predicting violent reconvictions using the HCR-20. Brit J Psychiat 192:384–387 Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York Greene MA, Hoffman PB, Beck JL (1994) The mean cost rating (MCR) is Somers’ D: a methodological note. J Crim Justice 22:63–69 Grevatt M, Thomas-Peter B, Hughes G (2004) Violence, mental disorder and risk assessment: can structured clinical assessments predict the short-term risk of inpatient violence? J Forensic Psychiat Psychol 15:278–292 Grove WM, Meehl PE (1996) Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychol Public Pol L 2:293–323 Guerriere MR, Detsky AS (1991) Neural networks: what are they? Ann Intern Med 115:906–907 Hanson RK (2005) Twenty years of progress in violence risk assessment. J Interpers Violence 20:212–217 Harper PR (2005) A review and comparison of classification algorithms for medical decision making. Health Policy 71:315–331 Hart SD, Webster CD, Menzies RJ (1993) A note on portraying the accuracy of violence predictions. Law Human Behav 17:695–700 Hartvig P, Alfarnes S, Ostberg B, Skjønberg M, Moger TA (2006) Brief checklists for assessing violence risk among patients discharged from acute psychiatric facilities: a preliminary study. Nord J Psychiat 60:243–248 Hemphill JF, Hare RD, Wong S (1998) Psychopathy and recidivism: a review. Legal Criminol Psychol 3:139–170 Henderson AR (1993) Assessing test accuracy and its clinical consequences: a primer for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Ann Clin Biochem 30:521–539 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York Howard P, Kershaw C (2000) Using criminal career data in evaluation. British criminology conference: selected proceedings, 3. Available online at www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ss/bsc/bccsp/vol03/howard.html Kass GV (1980) An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl Stat 29:119–127 Kroner DG, Mills JF (2001) The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Crim Justice Behav 28:471–489 Kroner DG, Mills JF, Reddon JR (2005) A coffee can, factor analysis, and prediction of antisocial behavior: the structure of criminal risk. Int J Law Psychiat 28:360–374 Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Rakowski W (2003) Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med 26:172–181 Lidz CW, Mulvey EP, Gardner W (1993) The accuracy of predictions of violence to others. J Am Med Assn 269:1007–1011 Lin CH, Chou LS, Lin CH, Hsu CY, Chen YS, Lane HY (2007) Early prediction of clinical response in schizophrenia patients receiving the atypical antipsychotic zotepine. J Clin Psychiat 68:1522–1527 Loh WY, Shih YS (1997) Split selection methods for classification trees. Stat Sinica 7:815–840 Manly BFJ (2005) Multivariate statistical methods: a primer, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton Maria-Pia Victoria-Feser (2000) Robust logistic regression for binomial responses. University of Geneva, Geneva McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133 Meehl PE, Rosen A (1955) Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychol Bull 52:194–216 Monahan J, Steadman HJ, Appelbaum PS, Robbins PC, Mulvey EP, Silver E (2000) Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk. Brit J Psychiat 176:312–320 Monahan J, Steadman HJ, Robbins PC, Appelbaum P, Banks S, Grisso T (2005) An actuarial model of violence risk assessment for persons with mental disorders. Psychiatr Serv 56:810–815 Monahan J, Steadman HJ, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Mulvey EP, Roth LH (2006) The classification of violence risk. Behav Sci Law 24:721–730 Mossman D (1994) Assessing predictions of violence: being accurate about accuracy. J Consult Clin Psych 62:783–792 National Institute of Justice (1992) Data resources of the National Institute of Justice, 5th edn. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC Nicholls TL, Ogloff JRP, Douglas KS (2004) Assessing risk for violence among male and female civil psychiatric patients: the HCR-20, PCL: SV, and VSC. Behav Sci Law 22:127–158 Ning GM, Su J, Li YQ, Wang XY, Li CH, Yan WM (2006) Artificial neural network based model for cardiovascular risk stratification in hypertension. Med Biol Eng Comput 44:202–208 Palocsay SW, Wang P, Brookshire RG (2000) Predicting criminal recidivism using neural networks. Socio Econ Plan Sci 34:271–284 Patterson D (1996) Artificial neural networks. Prentice Hall, Singapore Price RK, Spitznagel EL, Downey TJ, Meyer DJ, Risk NK, El-Ghazzawy OG (2000) Applying artificial neural network models to clinical decision making. Psychol Assess 12:40–51 Quinlan JR (1993) C4.5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo Quinlan JR (1996) Improved use of continuous attributes in C4.5. J Artif Intell Res 4:77–90 Reiss AJ (1951) The accuracy, efficiency, and validity of a prediction instrument. Am J Sociol 61:552–561 Rice ME, Harris GT (1995a) Violent recidivism: assessing predictive validity. J Consult Clin Psych 63:737–748 Rice ME, Harris GT (1995b) Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d and r. Law Human Behav 29:615–620 Ripley BD (1996) Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Rosenfeld B, Harmon R (2002) Factors associated with violence in stalking and obsessional harassment cases. Crim Justice Behav 29:671–691 Rosenfeld B, Lewis C (2005) Assessing violence risk in stalking cases: a regression tree approach. Law Human Behav 29:343–357 Rumelhart DE, McClelland J (1986) Parallel distributed processing, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Shepherd AJ (1997) Second-order methods for neural networks. Springer, New York Silver E, Chow-Martin L (2002) A multiple-models approach to assessing recidivism risk: implications for judicial decision making. Crim Justice Behav 29:538–568 Silver E, Smith WR, Banks S (2000) Constructing actuarial devices for predicting recidivism: a comparison of methods. Crim Justice Behav 27:733–764 Sjöstedt G, Grann M (2002) Risk assessment: what is being predicted by actuarial “prediction instruments”? Int J Forensic Ment Health 1:179–183 Smith WR (1996) The effects of base rate and cutoff point choice on commonly used measures of association and accuracy in recidivism research. J Quant Criminol 12:83–111 Smith WR, Smith DR (1998) The consequences of error: recidivism prediction and civil-libertarian ratios. J Crim Just 26:481–502 Stalens LJ, Yarnold PR, Seng M, Olson DE, Repp M (2004) Identifying three types of violent offenders and predictinv violent recidivism while on probation: A classification tree analysis. Law Human Behav 28:253–271 Starzomska M (2003) Use of artificial neural networks in clinical psychology and psychiatry. Psychiat Polska 37:349–357 StatSoft (2008) Data mining, predictive analytics, statistics, StatSoft electronic textbook. http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/ Steadman HJ, Monahan J (1994) Toward a rejuvenation of risk assessment research. In: Monahan J, Steadman HJ (eds) Violence and mental disorder. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 10–16 Steadman HJ, Mulvey E, Monahan J, Robbins P, Appelbaum P, Grisso T (1998) Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Arch Gen Psychiat 55:393–401 Steadman HJ, Silver E, Monahan J, Appelbaum PS, Robbins PC, Mulvey EP (2000) A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law Human Behav 24:83–100 Tam KY, Kiang MY (1992) Managerial applications of neural networks: the case of bank failure predictions. Manage Sci 20:879–888 Thomas S, Leese M (2003) A green-fingered approach can improve the clinical utility of violence risk assessment tools. Crim Behav Ment Health 13:153–158 Thomas S, Leesea M, Walsh E, McCrone P, Moran P, Burns T (2005) A comparison of statistical models in predicting violence in psychotic illness. Compr Psychiat 46:296–303 Trujillano J, Sarria-Santamera A, Esquerda A, Badia M, Palma M, March J (2008) Approach to the methodology of classification and regression trees. Gaceta Sanitaria/SESPAS 22:65–72 Tu JV (1996) Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 9:1225–1231 UK700 Group (1999) Predictors of quality of life in people with severe mental illness. Study methodology with baseline analysis in the UK700 trial. Brit J Psychiat 175:426–432 Vogel V, Ruiter C, Hildebrand M, Bos B, Ven P (2004) Type of discharge and risk of recidivism measured by the HCR-20: a retrospective study in a Dutch sample of treated forensic psychiatric patients. Int J Forensic Ment Health 3:149–165 Webster CD, Douglas KS, Eaves D, Hart S (1997) HCR-20: assessing risk for violence (version 2). Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada Webster CD, Muller-Isberner R, Frannson G (2002) Violence risk assessment: using structured clinical guidelines professionally. Int J Ment Health 2:185–193 Yang M, Liu YY, Coid JW (2010) Applying neural networks and classification tree models to the classification of serious offenders and the prediction of recidivism. Research Summary, Ministry of Justice, UK. Available online at www.justice.gov.uk/publications/research.htm Yarnold PR (1996) Discriminating geriatric and nongeriatric patients using functional status information: an example of classification tree analysis via UniODA. Educ Psychol Meas 56:656–667