A Comparison of Five Algorithms for Fetal Magnetocardiography Signal Extraction

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 9 - Trang 483-487 - 2018
Diana Escalona-Vargas1, Hau-tieng Wu2,3, Martin G. Frasch4, Hari Eswaran1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
2Department of Mathematics and Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, USA
3Mathematics Division, National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

Tóm tắt

Fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG) provides accurate and reliable measurements of electrophysiological events in the fetal heart and is capable of studying fetuses with congenital heart diseases. A variety of techniques exist to extract the fMCG signal with the demand for non-invasively obtained fetal cardiac information. To the best of our knowledge, there is no comparative study published in the field as to how the various extraction algorithms perform. We perform a comparative study of the ability of five methods to extract the fMCG using real biomagnetic signals, two of those methods are applied to real fMCG data for the first time. Biomagnetic signals were recorded and processed with each of the five methods to obtain fMCG. The R peaks of the fMCG traces were obtained via a peak-detection algorithm. From whole recording for each method, the fetal heart rate (FHR) was calculated and used to perform FHR variability (FHRV) analysis. Additionally, we calculated durations from the PQRST complex from time-averaged data during sinus rhythm. The five methods recovered the fMCG signals, but two of them were able to extract cleaner fMCG and the morphology was observed from the continuous data. The time-averaged data showed very similar morphologies between methods, but two of them displayed a signal amplitude reduction on the R-waves and T-waves. Values of PQRST durations, FHR and FHRV were in the range of previous fetal cardiac studies. We have compared five methods for fMCG extraction and showed their ability to perform fMCG analysis.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Comani, S., et al. Fetal magnetocardiographic mapping using independent component analysis. Physiol. Meas. 25(6):1459–1472, 2004. Donofrio, M. T., et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease. Circulation 129(21):2183–2242, 2014. Elgendi, M. Fast QRS detection with an optimized knowledge-based method: evaluation on 11 standard ECG databases. PLoS ONE 8(9):e73557, 2013. Escalona-Vargas, D., et al. Selection of reference channels based on mutual information for frequency-dependent subtraction method applied to fetal biomagnetic signals. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 64(5):1115–1122, 2017. Eswaran, H., et al. Fetal magnetocardiography using optically pumped magnetometers: a more adaptable and less expensive alternative? Prenat. Diagn. 37(2):193–196, 2017. Golbach, E., et al. Reference values for fetal MCG/ECG recordings in uncomplicated pregnancies. In: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Biomagn, Espoo, Finland, 2000. Govindan, R.B., et al., Early maturation of sinus rhythm dynamics in high-risk fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2007. 196(6): p. 572 e1-7; discussion 572 e7. Leuthold, A., R. T. Wakai, and C. B. Martin. Noninvasive in utero assessment of PR and QRS intervals from the fetal magnetocardiogram. Early Hum. Dev. 54(3):235–243, 1999. Lew, S., M. Hämäläinen, and Y. Okada. Toward noninvasive monitoring of ongoing electrical activity of human uterus and fetal heart and brain. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.08.026. Li, R., M. G. Frasch, and H.-T. Wu. Efficient fetal–maternal ECG signal separation from two channel maternal abdominal ECG via diffusion-based channel selection. Front. Physiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00277. McCubbin, J., et al. Optimal reduction of MCG in fetal MEG recordings. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53(8):1720–1724, 2006. Preissl, H., C. L. Lowery, and H. Eswaran. Fetal magnetoencephalography: viewing the developing brain in utero. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 68:1–23, 2005. Quinn, A., et al. Antenatal fetal magnetocardiography: a new method for fetal surveillance? BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 101(10):866–870, 1994. Strasburger, J. F., and R. T. Wakai. Fetal cardiac arrhythmia detection and in utero therapy. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 7(5):277–290, 2010. Su, L., and H.-T. Wu. Extract fetal ECG from single-lead abdominal ECG by de-shape short time Fourier transform and nonlocal median. Front. Appl. Math. Stat. 3:2, 2017. Tadel, F., et al. Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011:1–13, 2011. Ulusar, U. D., et al. Adaptive rule based fetal QRS complex detection using Hilbert transform. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2009:4666–4669, 2009. Uusitalo, M. A., and R. J. Ilmoniemi. Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 35(2):135–140, 1997. Van Leeuwen, P., et al. Heart rate variability in the individual fetus. Auton. Neurosci. 178(1):24–28, 2013. Vrba, J. Multichannel SQUID biomagnetic systems. In: Applications of Superconductivity. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 61–138, 2000. Vrba, J., et al. Fetal MEG redistribution by projection operators. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51(7):1207–1218, 2004. Vrba, J., et al. Removal of interference from fetal MEG by frequency dependent subtraction. NeuroImage 59(3):2475–2484, 2012. Wilson, J. D., and J. Haueisen. Separation of physiological signals using minimum norm projection operators. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 64(4):904–916, 2017.