A Characteristic‐Hull Based Method for Home Range Estimation

Transactions in GIS - Tập 13 Số 5-6 - Trang 527-537 - 2009
Joni Downs1, Mark W. Horner2
1Department of Geography University of South Florida
2Department of Geography Florida State University

Tóm tắt

AbstractRecent literature has reported inaccuracies associated with some popular home range estimators such as kernel density estimation, especially when applied to point patterns of complex shapes. This study explores the use of characteristic hull polygons (CHPs) as a new method of home range estimation. CHPs are special bounding polygons created in GIS that can have concave edges, be composed of disjoint regions, and contain areas of unoccupied space within their interiors. CHPs are created by constructing the Delaunay triangulation of a set of points and then removing a subset of the resulting triangles. Here, CHPs consisting of 95% of the smallest triangles, measured in terms of perimeter, are applied for home range estimation. First, CHPs are applied to simulated animal locational data conforming to five point pattern shapes at three sample sizes. Then, the method is applied to black‐footed albatross (Phoebastria nigripes) locational data for illustration and comparison to other methods. For the simulated data, 95% CHPs produced unbiased home range estimates in terms of size for linear and disjoint point patterns and slight underestimates (8–20%) for perforated, concave, and convex ones. The estimated and known home ranges intersected one another by 72–96%, depending on shape and sample size, suggesting that the method has potential as a home range estimator. Additionally, the CHPs applied to estimate albatross home ranges illustrate how the method produces reasonable estimates for bird species that intensively forage in disjoint habitat patches.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bailey T C, 1995, Interactive Spatial Data Analysis

10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00906.x

10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[422:COHRUP]2.0.CO;2

10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0469:LHREOS]2.0.CO;2

10.1016/0098-3004(95)00020-9

10.1080/136588199241175

10.1109/ISVD.2007.31

Downs J A, 2008, Effects of point pattern shape on home range estimates, Journal of Wildlife Management, 71, 1113

10.1016/j.patcog.2008.03.023

10.1017/S0952836901000899

10.2193/2006-370

10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.007

Galton A, 2006, GIScience 2006, 81

10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03835.x

10.2307/3802962

Gitzen R A, 2003, Comparison of least‐squares cross‐validation bandwidth options for kernel home‐range estimation, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 31, 823

10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[1334:BSFFAO]2.0.CO;2

10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00944.x

10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[641:LCVLSC]2.0.CO;2

10.1007/978-1-4615-7826-0

10.1016/B978-012497781-5/50006-2

10.2193/2005-589

10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[148:COTATT]2.0.CO;2

10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.05.001

10.2307/2421652

10.1080/13658810802475491

10.1080/13658810500399159

Rodgers A R, 2005, HRT: Home Range Tools for ArcGIS

10.1643/0045-8511(2006)6[797:KANAEO]2.0.CO;2

10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1446:TTRPOG]2.0.CO;2

10.2307/2265701

10.1111/1467-9671.00102

10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9

White G C, 1990, Analysis of Wildlife Radio‐tracking Data

10.1016/0304-3800(87)90101-3

10.2307/2533254