A Behavioural Analysis of the Future of Collective Redress for Financial Consumers Following the Supreme Court Decision in Merricks v Mastercard

Liverpool Law Review - Tập 44 Số 1 - Trang 83-106 - 2023
Joanne Atkinson1
1Portsmouth Law School, University of Portsmouth, Portland, England, UK

Tóm tắt

AbstractOne of the biggest problems faced by consumers seeking redress for financial harm is the prohibitive expense and impracticality of bringing low-value individual legal proceedings. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 introduced a new regime for collective redress for competition law infringements whereby for the first time, claims may be brought on an opt-out basis. The new regime was examined by the Supreme Court in its recent decision in Merricks v Mastercard. The Mastercard claim raises important questions about consumer remedies, access to justice, litigation funding and practical enforcement issues. This paper examines the decision through the lens of behavioural science, seeking insights into the availability and accessibility of redress for consumers and considering the implications for the regulation of lenders in the future. The influence of behavioural science on the development of the law is reviewed, the progress of the Mastercard claim and the Supreme Court’s decision is analysed, and some conclusions are proposed about possible future developments and the effectiveness of the collective redress regime from a behavioural perspective.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ariely, Daniel. 2008. Predictably irrational: the hidden forces that shape our decisions. London: Harper Collins.

Caplovitz, David. 1963. The poor pay more: consumer practices of low income families. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

Kahneman, Daniel. 2012. Thinking: fast and slow. London: Penguin.

Smith, Adam. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Strahan and Caddell.

Thaler, Richard and Cass Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Yale.

Bovens, Luc. 2008. The ethics of nudge. In Preference change: Approaches from philosophy, economics and psychology, ed.Till Grune-Yanoff and Sven Ove Hansson. London: Springer.

Harker, Michael and Judith Mehta. 2013. Behavioural remedies and cost benefit analysis: a cautionary note. In Behavioural Economics in Competition and Consumer Policy, ed. Judith Mehta. University of East Anglia: Centre for Competition Policy.

Hviid, Morten. 2013. Behavioural remedies in final consumer markets: theories and evidence. In Behavioural Economics in Competition and Consumer Policy, ed. Judith Mehta. University of East Anglia: Centre for Competition Policy.

Agarwal, Sumit, Souphala Chomsisengphet, Neale Mahoney, Johannes Stroebel. 2015. Regulating consumer financial products: Evidence from credit cards. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111–164.

Bartram, Peter. 2018. Restoring confidence in regulators. Economania 20180401.

Berg, Lisbet. 2014. Who benefits from behavioural economics? Economic Analysis and Policy 44: 221–232.

Berg, Lisbet, and Asa Gornitzka. 2012. The consumer attention deficit syndrome: consumer choices in complex markets. Acta Sociol 55: 159–178.

Berggren, Niclas. 2012. Time for behavioural political economy? An analysis of articles in behavioural economics. Review of Austrian Economics.

Bushell, Chris, Ceri Morgan, Sarah Penfold, Daniel Woods, and Nihar Lovell. 2021. Merricks v Mastercard: the litigation risks for the financial services sector. Journal of International Banking and Finance Law 11: 781.

Cartwright, Peter. 2016. Redress compliance and choice: enhanced consumer measures and the retreat from punishment in the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Cambridge Law Journal 75 (2): 271.

Fletcher, Amelia. 2021. Disclosure as a tool for enhancing consumer engagement and competition. Behavioural Public Policy 5 (2): 252.

Galeza, Dorots. 2020. Reforming the role of the Financial Services Ombudsman. Liverpool Law Review 41: 275–291.

Gilad, Sharon. 2008. Juggling conflicting demands: The case of the UK Financial Ombudsman Service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 19 (3): 661–680.

Harbord, Caroline and Candice Johnson. 2022. Collective proceedings orders: the story so far. New Law Journal 172:7966 13, 15.

Higgins, Andrew. 2016. Driving with the handbrake on: competition class actions under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Modern Law Review 79 (3): 442–467.

Hausman, Daniel, and Brynn Welch. 2010. Debate: to nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy 18: 123.

Hensler, Deborah R. 2017. From sea to shining sea: How and why class actions are spreading globally. Kansas Law Review 965.

Howells, Geraint. 2010. The consumer credit litigation explosion. Law Quarterly Review 126: 617.

Mak, Vanessa, and Evelyne Terryn. 2020. Circular economy and consumer protection: the consumer as a citizen and the limits of empowerment through consumer law. Journal of Consumer Policy 43 (1): 227.

Mulheron, Rachael. 2012. A missed gem of an opportunity for the representative rule. European Business Law Review 49.

Mulheron, Rachael. 2019. Revisiting the class action certification matrix in Merricks v Mastercard Inc. Kings Law Journal 30(2): 692.

Rischkowsky, Franziska, and Thomas Doring. 2008. Consumer policy in a market economy: Consideration from the perspective of the economics of information, the new institutional economics as well as behavioural economics. Journal of Consumer Policy 31: 285–313.

Robertson, Aidan. 2002. Litigating under the Competition Act 1998: The early caselaw. Competition Law 335.

Rodger, Barry J. 2015. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 and collective redress for competition law infringements in the UK: A class act? Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 3 (2): 258.

Silver, Samantha. 2021. Group actions: A perfect storm brewing. New Law Journal 171: 7947.

Thaler, Richard and Cass Sunstein. 2003. Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. University of Chicago Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No 43.

Vogelsang, Ingo, Nishal Ramphal, Stehen J. Carroll, and Nicholas M. Pace. 2007. An economic analysis of consumer class actions in regulated industries. Journal of Regulatory Economics 32: 87–104.

Walker, Carl, Paul Hanna, Liz Cunningham, and Peter Ambrose. 2015. Parasitic encounters in debt: The UK mainstream credit Industry. Theory & Psychology 25 (2): 239–256.

Walker, Mike. 2017. Behavioural economics: The lessons for regulators. European Competition Journal 13 (1): 1–27.

Wisking, Stephen, Kim Dietzel, and Molly Herron. 2013. The rise and rise of private enforcement in the United Kingdom- Government announces far-reaching overhaul of the Competition Law Private Actions regime. GCLR 6: 68–77.

Wojcik, Ewa. 2019. Caveat emptor vs fiduciary obligations of financial institutions: Ethical perspective: Current trends and implications. Journal of Sustainable Development 9 (2): 104.

Yeung, Karen. 2012. Nudge as fudge. Modern Law Review 75 (1): 122–148.

Davies, Sara, Andrea Finney, and Yvette Hartfree. 2016. Paying to be poor: uncovering the scale and nature of the poverty premium. University of Bristol Personal Finance Research Centre.

Fletcher, Amelia. 2016. The role of demand-side remedies in driving compeition: A review for Which? Centre for Competition Policy: University of East Anglia.

Kempson, Elaine, Sharon Collard, and Nick Moore. 2004. Fair and reasonable: An assessment of the Financial Ombudsman Service. London: Financial Ombudsman Service.

Sheehy-Skeffington, Jennifer, and Jessica Rea. 2017. How poverty affects people’s decision making processes. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Competition and Markets Authority. 2016. Making banks work harder for you: Retail banking market investigation.

Competition and Markets Authority, Financial Conduct Authority. 2018. Helping people get a better deal: Learning lessons about consumer facing remedies. London: UK Consumer Network.

Department for Business Innovation and Skills. 2012. Private actions in competition law: A consultation on options for reform.

European Commission. 2009. Antitrust: commission sends statement of objections to Visa. MEMO 09/151.

Financial Conduct Authority. 2017. FCA Mission: our future approach to consumers.

Financial Conduct Authority. 2019. Credit card market study 2019.

House of Commons. 2021. Brexit: UK consumer protection law. Briefing Paper 9126. London: House of Commons Library.

Croft, Jane and Lindsay Fortado. 2015. US style class action lawsuits poised to come into force in UK. London: Financial Times, 28 September 2015.

Ormerod, Paul. 2010. A network is as good as a nudge for a big society. London: Financial Times. 15 September 2010.

Weisman, Jonathan, and Jess. Bravin. 2009. Obama’s regulatory czar likely to set a new tone. New York: Wall Street Journal. 8 January 2009.

O’Regan, Michael. 2015. UK: Consumer Rights Act 2015 introduces new procedures for competition litigation, including collective follow-on damages actions. Kluwer Law Competition Law Blog http://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2015/10/05/united-kingdom-consumer-rights-act-2015-introduces-new-procedures-for-competition-litigation-including-collective-follow-on-damages-actions/. Accessed 28 March 2022.