Energy intensive infrastructure investments with retrofits in continuous time: Effects of uncertainty on energy use and carbon emissions

Resources and Energy Economics - Tập 41 - Trang 1-18 - 2015
Nils Chr. Framstad1,2, Jon Strand1,3
1Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Box 1095 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway
2The Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway, Norway
3Development Research Group, Environment and Energy Team, The World Bank, Washington, DC 20433, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anas, 2009, Lock-in effects of road expansion on CO2 emissions. Results from a core-periphery model of Beijing Balikcioglu, 2011, Solving optimal timing problems in environmental economics, Resour. Energy Econ., 33, 761, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.12.004 Borodin, 2002 Davis, 2010, Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure, Science, 329, 1330, 10.1126/science.1188566 Dixit, 1994 Framstad, 2011, A remark on R.S Pindyck: irreversibilities and the timing of environmental policy, Resour. Energy Econ., 33, 756, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.01.004 Framstad, 2014, When can the environmental profile and emissions reduction be optimised independently of the pollutant level?, J. Environ. Econ. Policy, 3, 24, 10.1080/21606544.2013.856353 Ha Duong, 1997, Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2 emission abatement, Nature, 390, 270, 10.1038/36825 Lecocq, 2014, The economics of targeted mitigation in infrastructure, Clim. Policy, 14, 187, 10.1080/14693062.2014.861657 Meunier, 2013, Option value in low-carbon technology policies, Clim. Policy, 13, 1, 10.1080/14693062.2012.699787 Pindyck, 2000, Irreversibility and the timing of environmental policy, Resour. Energy Econ., 22, 233, 10.1016/S0928-7655(00)00033-6 Pindyck, 2002, Optimal timing problems in environmental economics, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 26, 1677, 10.1016/S0165-1889(01)00090-2 Pindyck, 2007, Uncertainty in environmental economics, Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy, 1, 45, 10.1093/reep/rem002 Ramaswami, 2013, Understanding urban infrastructure-related greenhouse gas emissions and key mitigation strategies Strand, 2011, Inertia in infrastructure development: some analytical aspects, and reasons for inefficient infrastructure choices, J. Infrastruct. Dev., 2, 51 Strand, 2014 Strand, 2014, Implications of a lowered damage trajectory for mitigation in a continuous-time stochastic model, Energy Econ., 42, 41, 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.006 Strand, 2010, Climate cost uncertainty, retrofit cost uncertainty, and infrastructure closedown: a framework for analysis Strand, 2014, Infrastructure investment with the possibility of retrofit: theory and simulations, Energy Econ., 46, 308, 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.10.002 Vogt-Schilb, 2014, Long-term mitigation strategies and marginal abatement cost curves. a case study on Brazil, 10.1596/1813-9450-6808 Vogt-Schilb, 2012, How inertia and limited potential affect the timing of sectoral abatements in optimal climate policy, 10.1596/1813-9450-6154