Shaping China’s Climate Diplomacy: Wealth, Status, and Asymmetric Interdependence
Tóm tắt
China’s diplomacy in the post-Kyoto Protocol international climate change negotiations (ICCN) under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) bears proactive and reactive feature. On the one hand, China has proactively built several new coalitions including its bilateral climate coalition with India, the BASIC group and the Like-minded Developing Countries (LMDCs) while maintaining its traditional coalition with the Group-77 and China to facilitate its bargaining power against developed countries and their negotiating blocs. On the other hand, however, China has reactively made significant compromises to its negotiation partners on mitigation obligations of greenhouse gas emissions. Such a proactive and reactive feature of China’s climate diplomacy has been mainly shaped by: first, China’s desire to maximize its wealth/profits from its participation in the Clean Development Mechanism; secondly, its desire to build a responsible great power status in the international system; and thirdly, its asymmetric dependence on the developed countries especially the US and the EU for transferring climate mitigation-related technologies.
Tài liệu tham khảo
BASIC (2010) Joint statement issued at the conclusion of the third meeting of BASIC Ministers. Cape Town, April 25, 2010. Accessed 15 Dec 2014 @ http://envfor.nic.in/downloads/public-information/BASIC-statement.pdf.
BASIC. 2012. Joint statement issued at the conclusion of the 11th BASIC ministerial meeting on climate change. Johannesburg, South Africa, July 12–13, 2012. Accessed 15 Dec 2014 @ http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Joint%20Statement%20at%2011th%20BASIC%20Ministerial%20Meeting%20on%20Climate%20Change.pdf.
Beckley, M. 2011–12. China’s century? Why American edge will endure. International Security 36 (3):41–78.
Betsill, M.M. 2000. The United States and the evolution of international climate change norms. In Climate change and American foreign policy, ed. P.G. Harris, 205–224. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Department of Climate Change, National Development and Reform Commission of People’s Republic of China. 2007. Guojia qihou bianhua lingdao xiaozu [National leading committee on climate change]. June 2007. Accessed 17 Dec 2015 @ http://qhs.ndrc.gov.cn/ldxz/.
Department of Climate Change, National Development and Reform Commission of China. 2015. Enhanced actions on climate change: China’s intended nationally determined contributions. June 30, 2015. Accessed 24 Jul 2015 @ http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/China/1/China's%20INDC%20-%20on%2030%20June%202015.pdf.
Hallding, K., M. Jürisoo, M. Carson, and A. Atteridge. 2013. Rising powers: the evolving role of BASIC countries. Climate Policy 13(5): 608–631.
Harris, P.G., and Yu Hongyuan. 2009. Climate change in Chinese foreign policy: internal and external responses. In Climate change and foreign policy: case studies from East to West, ed. P.G. Harris, 53–67. London: Routledge.
Harris, P.G. (ed.). 2011. China’s responsibility for climate change: ethics, fairness and environmental policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Hochstetler, K.A. 2012. The G-77, BASIC, and global climate governance: a new era in multilateral environmental negotiations. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 55(special edition): 53–69.
IISD. 2011. Summary of the Durban climate change conference: 28 November - 11 December 2011. Earth Negotiation Bulletin (ENB) 12 (534), Dec 13 2011. Accessed 22 Dec 2014 @ http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb12534e.pdf.
IISD. 2012. Summary of the Bonn climate change conference: 14–25 May 2012. ENB 12(546), May 28, 2012. Accessed 21 Sept 2015 @ http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb12546e.pdf.
IISD. 2012. Summary of The Doha climate change conference: 26 November – 8 December 2012. ENB 12 (567), December 11, 2012. Accessed 20 Mar 2014 @ http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb12567e.pdf.
IISD. 2015. Summary of the Paris climate change conference: 29 November – 13 December 2015. 12 (663), December 15, 2015. Accessed Dec 15 2015 @ http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb12663e.pdf.
Johnston, A.I. 2008. Social states: China in international institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kang, X. 2009. Zhongguo kaizhan kezaisheng nengyuan guoji hezuo de tujing yu wenti [The means and problems of China’s international cooperation on developing renewable energy. Xiandai Guoji Guanxi [Contemporary International Relations] 6: 43–49.
Kasa, S., A.T. Gullberg, and G. Heggelund. 2008. The Group of 77 in the international climate negotiations: recent developments and future directions. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law, and Economics 8(2): 113–127.
Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye. 2001. Power and interdependence, 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
Kobayashi, Y. 2001. Navigating between “luxury” and “survival” emissions. In Global warming and East Asia: the domestic and international politics of climate change, ed. P.G. Harris, 86–108. New York: Routledge.
Korppoo, A., and A. Luta (eds.). 2009. Towards a new climate regime: views of China, India, Japan, Russia and the United States on the road to Copenhagen. Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
Krishnan, A. 2009. Climate cooperation changing India–China ties, says Jairam Ramesh. The Hindu, April 9, 2010. Accessed 10 Dec 2014. http://beta.thehindu.com/news/international/article392921.ece.
Lachapelle, E., and M. Paterson. 2013. Drivers of national climate policy. Climate Policy 13(5): 547–571.
Lai, H. 2010. The domestic sources of China’s foreign policy: regimes, leadership, priorities and process. London: Routledge.
Lewis, J. I. 2007–08. China’s strategic priorities in international climate change negotiations. Washington Quarterly 31(1): 155–174.
Lloyd, B., and S. Subbarao. 2009. Development challenges under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)—can renewable energy initiatives be put in place before peak oil? Energy Policy 37(1): 237–245.
Lynas, M. 2009. How do I know China wrecked the Copenhagen deal? I was in the room. The Guardian, December 22, 2009. Accessed 2 Feb 2012 @ http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/dec/22/copenhagen-climate-change-mark-lynas.
Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. 2015. Joint statement on climate change between India and China during Prime Minister’s visit to China, May 15, 2015. Accessed 17 Sept 2015 @ http://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/25238/Joint_Statement_on_Climate_Change_between_India_and_China_during_Prime_Ministers_visit_to_China.
Moore, S. 2011. Strategic imperative? reading China’s climate policy in terms of core interests. Global Change, Peace & Security 23(2): 147–157.
OECD. 2015. Main Science and Technology Indicators. Accessed 20 Jan 2015 @ http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MSTI_PUB.
Press Information Bureau, Government of India. 2009. India and China signs agreement on cooperation on addressing climate change, October 21, 2009. Accessed 15 Dec 2014 @ http://www.pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=53317.
Putnam, R.D. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization 42(3): 427–460.
Rapp, T. C. Schwägerl and G. Traufetter. 2010. The Copenhagen Protocol: How China and India Sabotaged the UN Climate Summit. Spiegle Online International, May 5, 2010. Accessed 20 Jan 2012 @ http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-copenhagen-protocol-how-china-and-india-sabotaged-the-un-climate-summit-a-692861.html.
Sethi, N. 2014. US, EU nations try to split developing country group at climate talks. Business Standard, August 30, 2014. Accessed 12 Oct 2014 @ http://www.business-standard.com/article/international/us-eu-nations-play-divide-and-rule-at-climate-talks-114083000664_1.html.
Stalley, P. 2013. Principled strategy: the role of equity norms in China’s climate change diplomacy. Global Environmental Politics 13(1): 1–8.
Stewart, R.B., and J.B. Wiener. 2003. Reconstructing climate policy beyond Kyoto. Washington DC: the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Underdal, A. 1983. Causes of negotiation “failure”. European Journal of Political Research 11(2): 183–195.
UNFCCC (2013) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013 (FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1), January 31, 2014. Accessed 18 Sept 2015 @ http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2013/cop19/eng/10a01.pdf#page=3.
UNFCCC. 2014. Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Accessed 13 May 2014 @ http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/mechanisms/clean_development_mechanism/items/2718.php.
UNFCCC. 2015. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twentieth session, held in Lima from 1 to 14 December 2014 (FCCC/CP/2014/10/Add.1), February 2, 2015. Accessed 18 Sept 2015 @ http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2014/cop20/eng/10a01.pdf#page=2.
UNFCCC. 2015. Total potential supply of CERs from the end of the 1st Kyoto Protocol commitment period (31 Dec. 2012) to 2020, April 30, 2015. Accessed 13 May 2015 @ http://cdm.unfccc.int/Statistics/Public/files/201504/proj_reg_byHost.pdf.
UNFCCC. 2015. Total potential supply of CERs by host party from the end of the 1st Kyoto Protocol commitment period (31 Dec. 2012) to 2020, April 30, 2015. Accessed 13 May 2015 @ http://cdm.unfccc.int/Statistics/Public/files/201504/exp_cers_byHost.pdf.
UNFCCC. 2015. Total potential supply of CERs by project type from the end of the 1st Kyoto Protocol commitment period (31 Dec. 2012) to 2020, April 30, 2015. Accessed 13 May 2015 @ http://cdm.unfccc.int/Statistics/Public/files/201504/exp_cers_byType.pdf.
UNFCCC. 2015. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. December 12, 2015. Accessed 13 Dec 2015 @ http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09.pdf.
United Nations. 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Accessed 5 Feb 2010 @ http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/application/pdf/conveng.pdf.
United Nations. 1998. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Accessed 5 Feb 2010 @ http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf.
Victor, D.G. 2001. The collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the struggle for slow global warming. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Victor, D. 2011. Global warming gridlock. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vihma, A. 2010. Elephant in the Room: the new G77 and China dynamics in climate talks. Briefing Paper. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs. Accessed 15 Mar 2011 @ www.fiia.fi/assets/publications/UPI_Briefing_Paper_62_2010.pdf.
Weiler, F. 2012. Determinants of bargaining success in the climate change negotiations. Climate Policy 12(5): 552–574.
World Resource Institute. 2014. CAIT 2.0. Accessed 22 Dec 2014 @ http://cait2.wri.org/wri.
Wu, F. 2012. Sino-Indian climate cooperation: implications for the international climate change regime. Journal of Contemporary China 21(77): 827–843.
Wu, F. 2013. China’s pragmatic tactics in international climate change negotiations. Asian Survey 53(4): 778–800.
Xu, L. 2015. Bali xieding dui Zhongguo yiweizhe shenmei? [What does Paris Agreement mean for China?],” Jinhua Shibao [Jinghua Times], December 15, 2015. Accessed 16 Dec 2015 @ http://www.ccchina.gov.cn/Detail.aspx?newsId=57936&TId=184.
Yu, H. 2008. Global warming and China’s environmental diplomacy. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Zhang, H. 2007. Zhongguo yu guoji qihou bianhua tanpan [China and the international climate change negotiations]. Guoji Zhengzhi Yanjiu [International Political Studies] 1: 21–36.
Zhang, Z. 2003. The forces behind China’s climate change policy: interests, sovereignty, and prestige. In Global warming and East Asia: the domestic and international politics of climate change, ed. P.G. Harris, 66–85. New York: Routledge.