A computational framework for fluid–porous structure interaction with large structural deformation

Chapelle D et al (2009) A poroelastic model valid in large strains with applications to perfusion in cardiac modeling. Comput Mech 46(1):91–101 Chabiniok R et al (2016) Multiphysics and multiscale modelling, data-model fusion and integration of organ physiology in the clinic: ventricular cardiac mechanics. Interface Focus 6(2):1–24 Calo VM et al (2008) Multiphysics model for blood flow and drug transport with application to patient-specific coronary artery flow. Comput Mech 43(1):161–177 Feenstra PH et al (2009) Drug transport in artery walls: a sequential porohyperelastic-transport approach. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 12(3):263–276 Badia S et al (2009) Coupling Biot and Navier–Stokes equations for modelling fluid–poroelastic media interaction. J Comput Phys 228(21):7986–8014 Koshiba N et al (2007) Multiphysics simulation of blood flow and LDL transport in a porohyperelastic arterial wall model. J Biomech Eng 129(3):374–385 McCutchen CW (1982) Cartilage is poroelastic, not viscoelastic (including and exact theorem about strain energy and viscous loss, and an order of magnitude relation for equilibration time). J Biomech 15(4):325–327 Yang Z et al (2006) Dynamic finite element modeling of poroviscoelastic soft tissue. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 9(1):7–16 Armstrong MH et al (2016) A finite element model for mixed porohyperelasticity with transport, swelling, and growth. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0152806 Goriely A et al (2015) Mechanics of the brain: perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 14(5):931–965 Bukac M et al (2015) Effects of poroelasticity on fluid–structure interaction in arteries: a computational sensitivity study. In: Modeling the heart and the circulatory system. Springer, New York, pp 197–220 Bazilevs Y et al (2006) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38(4–5):310–322 Bazilevs Y et al (2009) Patient-specific isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(45–46):3534–3550 Crosetto P et al (2011) Fluid–structure interaction simulation of aortic blood flow. Comput Fluids 43(1):46–57 Chepelenko GV (2015) Atherosclerosis regulation via media lipid-driven VSMC cholesterol efflux switch. Med Hypotheses 84(2):141–144 Smith E (1990) Transport, interactions and retention of plasma proteins in the intima: the barrier function of the internal elastic lamina. Eur Heart J 11(suppl E):72–81 Zakerzadeh R, Bukac M, Zunino P (2015) Computational analysis of energy distribution of coupled blood flow and arterial deformation. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math 8(1):70–85 Burtschell B et al (2017) Effective and energy-preserving time discretization for a general nonlinear poromechanical formulation. Comput Struct 182:313–324 Vuong AT et al (2015) A general approach for modeling interacting flow through porous media under finite deformations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:1240–1259 Chapelle D et al (2014) General coupling of porous flows and hyperelastic formulations—from thermodynamics principles to energy balance and compatible time schemes. Eur J Mech B Fluids 46:82–96 Balzani D, Deparis S, Fausten S, Forti D, Heinlein A, Klawonn A, Quarteroni A, Rheinbach O, Schröder J (2015) Numerical modeling of fluid–structure interaction in arteries with anisotropic polyconvex hyperelastic and anisotropic viscoelastic material models at finite strains. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2756 Tricerri P et al (2015) Fluid–structure interaction simulations of cerebral arteries modeled by isotropic and anisotropic constitutive laws. Comput Mech 55(3):479–498 Bukač M et al (2015) Partitioning strategies for the interaction of a fluid with a poroelastic material based on a Nitsche’s coupling approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 292:138–170 Zakerzadeh R et al (2014) Fluid–structure interaction in arteries with a poroelastic wall model. In: 21st Iranian conference of biomedical engineering (ICBME) IEEE, pp 35–39 Dunne T et al (2010) Numerical simulation of fluid–structure interaction based on monolithic variational formulations. In: Fundamental trends in fluid–structure interaction (contemporary challenges in mathematical fluid dynamics and its applications) vol 1, pp 1–75 Burman E et al (2014) Explicit strategies for incompressible fluid–structure interaction problems: Nitsche type mortaring versus Robin–Robin coupling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 97(10):739–758 Hansbo P (2005) Nitsche’s method for interface problems in computational mechanics. GAMM-Mitteilungen 28(2):183–206 Yang M et al (1991) The possible role of poroelasticity in the apparent viscoelastic behavior of passive cardiac muscle. J Biomech 24(7):587–597 Taber LA et al (1996) Poroelastic plate and shell theories. In: Mechanics of poroelastic media. Springer, New York, pp 323–337 Biot MA (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12(2):155–164 Biot MA (1955) Theory of elasticity and consolidation for a porous anisotropic solid. J Appl Phys 26(2):182–185 Biot MA (1956) General solutions of the equations of elasticity and consolidation for a porous material. J Appl Mech 23(1):91–96 Biot MA (1956) Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid–saturated porous solid. I. Low–frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am 28(2):168–178 Discacciati M et al (2009) Navier–Stokes/Darcy coupling: modeling, analysis, and numerical approximation. Revista Matemática Complutense 22(2):315–426 Quaini A et al (2007) A semi-implicit approach for fluid–structure interaction based on an algebraic fractional step method. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 17(6):957–983 Uzuoka R et al (2012) Dynamics of unsaturated poroelastic solids at finite strain. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 36(13):1535–1573 Coussy O (2004) Poromechanics. Wiley, New York Girault V et al (2015) A lubrication fracture model in a poro-elastic medium. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 25(4):587–645 Fowler AC et al (1998) Fast and slow compaction in sedimentary basins. SIAM J Appl Math 59(1):365–385 Holzapfel GA (2002) Nonlinear solid mechanics: a continuum approach for engineering science. Meccanica 37(4):489–490 Burman E et al (2009) Stabilization of explicit coupling in fluid–structure interaction involving fluid incompressibility. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(5–8):766–784 Quarteroni A et al (2010) Numerical mathematics, vol 37. Springer, New York Razzaq M et al (2009) Numerical simulation and benchmarking of fluid structure interaction with application to hemodynamics. Techn Univ, Fak für Mathematik Jendoubi A et al (2016) A simple mesh-update procedure for fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput Struct 169:13–23 Hecht F (2012) New development in freefem+. J Numer Math 20(3–4):251–265 Brooks AN et al (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32(1):199–259 Ijiri T et al (2012) A kinematic approach for efficient and robust simulation of the cardiac beating motion. PLoS ONE 7(5):e36706 Bukač M et al (2013) Fluid–structure interaction in blood flow capturing non-zero longitudinal structure displacement. J Comput Phys 235:515–541 Ren H et al (2009) Poroelastic analysis of permeability effects in thinly layered porous media. Geophysics 74(6):N49–N54 Costi JJ et al (2008) Frequency-dependent behavior of the intervertebral disc in response to each of six degree of freedom dynamic loading: solid phase and fluid phase contributions. Spine 33(16):1731 Cederbaum G et al (2000) Poroelastic structures. Elsevier, Amsterdam Yeh F-H et al (1998) Dynamic behavior of a poroelastic slab subjected to uniformly distributed impulsive loading. Comput Struct 67(4):267–277