Restoration materials for primary molars—results from a European survey

Guelmann, 2001, The teaching of class I and class II restorations in primary molars: a survey of North American dental schools, Pediatric Dentistry, 23, 410 Christensen, 1996, Restoration of posterior teeth, The Journal of the American Dental Association, 127, 106, 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0004 Sundberg, 2000, Swedish dentists' decisions on preparation techniques and restorative materials, Acta Odontologica Scandinavia, 58, 135, 10.1080/000163500429271 van Meerbeek, 1991, Trends in the selection of dental filling materials, Journal of Dentistry, 19, 207, 10.1016/0300-5712(91)90118-I Varpio, 1993, Changes in comprehensive dental care of the primary dentition from 1979 to 1989. II. Restorative treatment of primary molars in a population treated at a university dental clinic, Swedish Dental Journal, 17, 35 Maggs-Rapport, 2000, Community dental officers' use and knowledge of restorative techniques for primary molars: an audit of two Trusts in Wales, International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 10, 133, 10.1046/j.1365-263x.2000.00182.x Fan, 1997, Environmental issues in dentistry-mercury, International Dental Journal, 47, 105, 10.1111/j.1875-595X.1997.tb00684.x Harhammer, 2001, Zur Risikobewertung des zahnärztlichen Füllungswerkstoffes Amalgam, Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 44, 149, 10.1007/s001030050424 Hickel, 1990, A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars, ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children, 57, 184 Jumlongras, 1997, Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth, The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 21, 223 Marks, 2000, Ketac molar versus Dyract class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results, ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children, 67, 37 Krejci, 1994, Kompomere—Amalgamersatz für Milchzahnkavitäten?, Schweizerische Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin, 104, 724 Mass, 1999, Assessment of compomer proximal restorations in primary molars: a retrospective study in children, ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children, 66, 93 Dilley, 1990, Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations, ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children, 57, 177 Gordan, 2000, Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools, Quintessence International, 31, 735 Mjör, 1998, Teaching class I and class II direct composite restorations: results of a survey of dental schools, The Journal of the American Dental Association, 129, 1415, 10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0076 Marks, 1999, Conservative interproximal box-only polyacid modified composite restorations in primary molars, twelve-month clinical results, Journal of Dentistry for Children, 66, 23 Wilson, 2000, The teaching of class I and class II direct composite restorations in European dental schools, Journal of Dentistry, 28, 15, 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00055-X Almuammar, 2001, Shear bond strength of six restorative materials, The Journal of Clincal Pediatric Dentistry, 25, 221, 10.17796/jcpd.25.3.r8g48vn51l46421m Morabito, 1997, The marginal seal of various restorative materials in primary molars, The Journal of Clincal Pediatric Dentistry, 22, 51 Welbury, 2000, Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months, British Dental Journal, 189, 93, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800693 Manhart, 2004, Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition, Operative Dentistry, 29, 481 Hickel, 2004, Longevity of occlusally stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth, American Journal of Dentistry, 17 Qvist, 2004, Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer, European Journal of Oral Sciences, 112, 188, 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00117.x Duggal, 2002, Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation, British Dental Journal, 193, 339, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801560 Gross, 2001, Compomers as class II restorations in primary molars, Pediatric Dentistry, 23, 24 Folkesson, 1999, Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars, Swedish Dental Journal, 23, 1 Donly, 1999, Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations, The Journal of the American Dental Association, 130, 1459, 10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0056 Marks, 1999, Dyract versus Tytin class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation, Caries Research, 33, 387, 10.1159/000016538 Papagiannoulis, 1999, Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study, Pediatric Dentistry, 21, 231 El-Kalla, 1999, Fracture strength of adhesively restored pulpotomized primary molars, ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children, 66, 238 Weiner, 1999, Teaching the use of bases and liners: a survey of North American Dental Schools, The Journal of the American Dental Association, 127, 1640, 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0100