Place of registration and place of residence: the non-linear detrimental impact of transportation cost on electoral participation
Tóm tắt
The French case offers a very valuable opportunity for testing the impact of transportation costs on the individual decision of turnout, because in France, voters can be registered in a municipality other than their residential municipality. Voters with a non-residential registration have to travel great distances in order to cast their ballots compared to voters with a residential registration. Our empirical analysis, based on a unique dataset extracted from the French Census database, uses a selection model to estimate the probability of voting of an individual voter with a non-residential electoral registration and assesses the impact of the distance to the voting municipality on this probability. The analysis shows that distance and in fine the cost of voting have a highly significant impact on electoral turnout: at the median distance (22 km), a 1% increase in distance induces a reduction of 0.01% in turnout in the first round of the 2012 French presidential election and 0.007% in the second round. Moreover, the impact of distance is non-linear: an increase in distance for voters with a short distance to travel is more detrimental to turnout than the same increase for voters who travel great distances. The results are robust to several checks, ranging from analyzing other elections to changes in the estimation method. This analysis provides new insights in the issue of voting cost and its impact on electoral turnout.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aldrich, J. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 246–278.
Belli, R. F., Traugott, M. W., & Beckmann, M. N. (2001). What leads to voting overreports? Contrasts of overreporters to validated voters and admitted nonvoters in the American national election studies. Journal of Official Statistics, 17(4), 479–498.
Belli, R. F., Traugott, M. W., Young, M., & McGonagle, K. A. (1999). Reducing vote overreporting in surveys: Social desirability, memory failure, and source monitoring. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63(1), 90–108.
Ben Lakhdar, C., & Dubois, E. (2006). Climate and electoral turnout in France. French Politics, 4(1), 137–147.
Ben Lakhdar, C., & Dubois, E. (2007). More on the seasonal determinants of turnout: Holidays and French presidential elections. French Politics, 5(2), 144–159.
Bernstein, R., Chadha, A., & Montjoy, R. (2001). Overreporting voting: Why it happens and why it matters. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(1), 22–44.
Bhatti, Y. (2012). Distance and voting: Evidence from Danish municipalities. Scandinavian Political Studies, 35(2), 141–158.
Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote ? The merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Brady, H. E., & McNulty, J. E. (2011). Turning out to vote: The costs of finding and getting to the polling place. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 115–134.
Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1984). Voter choice: Evaluating political alternatives. American Behavioral Scientist, 28(2), 185–201.
Brennan, G., & Hamlin, A. (2000). Democratic devices and desires. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, J. (1984). Early projections and voter turnout in the 1980 presidential election. Public Choice, 43, 195–202.
Cassel, C. A. (2003). Overreporting and electoral participation research. American Politics Research, 31(1), 81–92.
Cho, W. K. T., Gimpel, J. G., & Dyck, J. J. (2006). Residential concentration, political socialization and voter turnout. The Journal of Politics, 68, 156–167.
Converse, P. (2000). Assessing the capacity of mass electorates. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 331–353.
De Luca, G., & Perotti, V. (2011). Estimation of ordered response models with sample selection. Stata Journal, 11, 213–239.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
Dunne, S., Reed, R. W., & Wilbanks, J. (1997). Endogenizing the median voter: Public choice goes to school. Public Choice, 93, 99–118.
Dupoirier, E., & Sauger, N. (2010). Four rounds in a row: The impact of presidential election outcomes on legislative elections in France. French Politics, 8(1), 21–41.
Dyck, J. J., & Gimpel, J. G. (2005). Distance, turnout, and the convenience of voting. Social Science Quarterly, 86(3), 531–548.
Fauvelle-Aymar, C., & François, A. (2015). Mobilization, cost of voting and turnout: A natural randomized experiment with double elections. Public Choice, 162(1), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0212-0.
Fauvelle-Aymar, C., Lafay, J. D., & Servais, M. (2000). The impact of turnout on electoral choices: An econometric analysis of the french case. Electoral Studies, 19(2–3), 393–412.
Fauvelle-Aymar, C., Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Nadeau, R. (2011). French electoral reform and the abstention rate. Parliamentary Affaires, 64(1), 45–60.
Feddersen, T. (2004). Rational choice theory and the paradox of not voting. Journal of Economic Perspective, 38, 390–413.
Filer, J., & Kenny, L. (1980). Voter turnout and the benefits of voting. Public Choice, 35, 575–585.
Filer, J. E., Kenny, L. W., & Morton, R. B. (1993). Redistribution, income, and voting. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 63–87.
Fujiwara, T. (2015). Voting technology, political responsiveness, and infant health: Evidence from Brazil. Econometrica, 83(2), 423–464.
Geys, B. (2006a). Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637–663.
Geys, B. (2006b). ’Rational’ theories of voter turnout: A review. Political Studies Review, 4, 16–35.
Geys, B., & Cancela, J. (2016). Explaining voter turnout: A meta-analysis of national and subnational elections. Electoral Studies, 42(june), 264–75.
Gibson, J., Kim, B., Stillman, S., & Boe-Gibson, G. (2013). Time to vote? Public Choice, 156(3), 517–536.
Gimpel, J. G., Dyck, J. J., & Shaw, D. R. (2006). Location, knowledge and time pressures in the spatial structure of convenience voting. Electoral studies, 25, 35–58.
Gimpel, J., & Schuknecht, J. (2003). Political participation and the accessibility of the ballot box. Political Geography, 22, 471–488.
Gomez, B. T., Hansford, T. G., & Krause, G. A. (2007). The republicans should pray for rain: Weather, turnout, and voting in U.S. presidential elections. Journal of Politics, 69(3), 649–663.
Haspel, M., & Knotts, H. (2005). Location, location, location: Precinct placement and the costs of voting. The Journal of Politics, 67, 560–573.
Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–68.
Jones, K., & Johnston, C. P. R. J. (1992). People, places and regions: Exploring the use of multi-level modelling in the analysis of electoral data. British Journal of Political Science, 22(3), 343–380.
Kan, K., & Yang, C. (2001). On expressive voting: Evidence from the 1988 US presidential election. Public Choice, 108, 295–312.
Knack, S. (1994). Does rain help the republicans? Theory and evidence on turnout and the vote. Public Choice, 79, 187–209.
Luechinger, S., Rosinger, M., & Stutzer, A. (2007). The impact of postal voting on participation: Evidence for Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 13(2), 167–202.
Mcnulty, J. E., Dowling, C. M., & Ariotti, M. H. (2009). Driving saints to sin: How increasing the difficulty of voting dissuades even the most motivated voters. Political Analysis, 17(4), 435–455.
Mikko, M. (2003). Why bother? Determinants of turnout in the European elections. Electoral Studies, 22, 449–468.
Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cuttting networks for political participation. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 749–775.
Presser, S. (1984). Is inaccuracy on factual survey items item-specific or respondent-specific? Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(1B), 344–355.
Puhani, P. (2000). The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(1), 53–68.
Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American political science review, 62(01), 25–42.
Rosenstone, S., & Wolfinger, R. (1978). The effect of registration laws on voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 72, 22–45.
Silver, B. D., Anderson, B. A., & Abramson, P. R. (1986). Who overreports voting? The American Political Science Review, 80(2), 613–624.
Tollison, R. D., & Willett, T. D. (1973). Some simple economics of voting and not voting. Public Choice, 16, 59–71.
Tucker, H. J., Vedlitz, A., & DeNardo, J. (1986). Heavy turnout help democrats in presidential elections? American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1291–1304.
Tullock, G. (1968). Toward a mathematics of politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Van de Ven, W., & Van Pragg, B. (1981). The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection. Journal of Econometrics, 17, 229–252.