Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT for the Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease

Douglas, 2015, Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease, N Engl J Med, 372, 1291, 10.1056/NEJMoa1415516 Litt, 2012, CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes, N Engl J Med, 366, 1393, 10.1056/NEJMoa1201163 Fihn, 2014, J Am Coll Cardiol, 64, 1929, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.017 George, 2014, Myocardial CT perfusion imaging and SPECT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a head-to-head comparison from the CORE320 Multicenter Diagnostic Performance Study, Radiology, 272, 407, 10.1148/radiol.14140806 Bamberg, 2011, Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging, Radiology, 260, 689, 10.1148/radiol.11110638 Rossi, 2014, Stress myocardial perfusion: imaging with multidetector CT, Radiology, 270, 25, 10.1148/radiol.13112739 Rossi, 2014, Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed tomography: does it predict functionally significant coronary lesions?, Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 15, 85, 10.1093/ehjci/jet133 Wang, 2012, Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 198, 521, 10.2214/AJR.11.7830 Pontone, 2019, Dynamic stress computed tomography perfusion with a whole-heart coverage scanner in addition to coronary computed tomography angiography and fractional flow reserve computed tomography derived, J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 12, 2460, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.02.015 Takafuji, 2020, Myocardial coverage and radiation dose in dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging using third-generation dual-source CT, Korean J Radiol, 21, 58, 10.3348/kjr.2019.0323 Mahnken, 2010, Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience, Invest Radiol, 45, 298, 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa3cf Ebersberger, 2014, Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: performance of 3D semi-automated evaluation software, Eur Radiol, 24, 191, 10.1007/s00330-013-2997-5 Cerqueira, 2002, Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association, Circulation, 105, 539, 10.1161/hc0402.102975 Leipsic, 2014, SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 8, 342, 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.003 Rossi, 2017, Dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison of clinical analysis methods for the detection of vessel-specific ischemia, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 10, 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005505 Adjedj, 2017, Visual and quantitative assessment of coronary stenoses at angiography versus fractional flow reserve: the impact of risk factors, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 10 Toth, 2014, Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses, Eur Heart J, 35, 2831, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu094 DeLong, 1988, Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach, Biometrics, 44, 837, 10.2307/2531595 Lu, 2018, Dynamic stress computed tomography myocardial perfusion for detecting myocardial ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Cardiol, 258, 325, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.095 Wichmann, 2015, Absolute versus relative myocardial blood flow by dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with anatomic coronary artery disease, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 205, W67, 10.2214/AJR.14.14087 van Assen, 2019, Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging, Eur J Radiol, 110, 175, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.029 Kono, 2014, Relative myocardial blood flow by dynamic computed tomographic perfusion imaging predicts hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis better than absolute blood flow, Invest Radiol, 49, 801, 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000087 Coenen, 2017, Integrating CT myocardial perfusion and CT-FFR in the work-up of coronary artery disease, J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 10, 760, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.028 Pontone, 2020, Diagnostic performance of non-invasive imaging for stable coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis, Int J Cardiol, 300, 276, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.10.046 de Knegt, 2020, Stress myocardial perfusion with qualitative magnetic resonance and quantitative dynamic computed tomography: comparison of diagnostic performance and incremental value over coronary computed tomography angiography, Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa270 Celeng, 2019, Anatomical and functional computed tomography for diagnosing hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis, J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 12, 1316, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.022 Pontone, 2019, Stress computed tomography perfusion versus fractional flow reserve CT derived in suspected coronary artery disease: the PERFECTION study, J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 12, 1487, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.023 Lubbers, 2018, Comprehensive cardiac CT with myocardial perfusion imaging versus functional testing in suspected coronary artery disease: the multicenter, randomized CRESCENT-II trial, J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 11, 1625, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.010 Yu, 2020, Clinical outcomes of dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging combined with coronary computed tomography angiography versus coronary computed tomography angiography-guided strategy, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 13, 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009775 Nallamothu, 2013, Comparison of clinical interpretation with visual assessment and quantitative coronary angiography in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice: the Assessing Angiography (A2) project, Circulation, 127, 1793, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001952