Niels Bohr on the wave function and the classical/quantum divide

Bacciagaluppi, G. (2008). The statistical interpretation according to Born and Heisenberg. In Joas, C., Lehner, C., Renn, J. (Eds.), HQ-1: Conference on the History of Quantum Physics. MPIWG Preprint Series no. 350 (pp. 269–288). Berlin, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut fuer Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Bacciagaluppi, 2009 Bohr, 1928, The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory, Vol. I, 147 Bohr, 1935, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete, 73 Bohr, 1937, Vol. II, 13 Bohr, N. (1938). The causality problem in atomic physics (pp. 94–121). In Faye, J., Folse, H.J. (Eds.) (Reprinted in 1998, see above). Bohr, N. (1949). Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics (Vol. II, pp. 32–66) (Reprinted in The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, see above). Bohr, N. (1954). Unity of knowledge (Vol. II, pp. 67–82) (Reprinted in The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, see above). Bohr, N. (1956). Mathematics and natural philosophy (pp. 164–169). In Faye, J., Folse, H.J. (Eds.) (Reprinted in 1998, see above). Bohr, N. (1957). Physical science and the problem of life (Vol. II, pp. 94–101) (Reprinted in The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, see above). Bohr, 1958, 1 Bokulich, 2005, Niels Bohr’s generalization of classical mechanics, Foundations of Physics, 35, 347, 10.1007/s10701-004-1979-5 Camilleri, 2015, Niels Bohr as philosopher of experiment: Does decoherence theory challenge Bohr׳s doctrine of classical concepts?, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 29, 73, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.01.005 Chevalley, 1996, Physics as an art: The German tradition and the symbolic turn in philosophy, history of art and natural science in the 1920s Dickson, 2002, The EPR experiment: A prelude to Bohr’s reply to EPR, Vol. 9, 263 Dickson, 2004, A view from nowhere: quantum reference frames and uncertainty, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35, 195, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2003.12.003 Dickson, 2007, Non-relativistic quantum mechanics, 275 Falkenburg, 2007 1999, Niels Bohr collected works, Vol. 10 Faye, J. (2008). Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. In Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Ed.) 〈http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/qm-copenhagen/〉. Faye, 1998, Introduction, Vol. 4, 1 Fine, 1994, Bohr׳s response to EPR, 1 Friederich, 2013, In defence of non-ontic accounts of quantum states, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44, 77, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.01.002 Gomatam, 2007, Niels Bohr׳s interpretation and the Copenhagen interpretation—Are the two incompatible?, Philosophy of Science, 74, 736, 10.1086/525618 Henderson, 2010, Classes of Copenhagen interpretations: Mechanisms of collapse as typologically determinative, Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 1, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.08.001 Hermann, 1979, Vol. I Herzog, 1995, Complementarity and the quantum eraser, Physical Review Letters, 75, 3034, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3034 Howard, 1994, What makes a classical concept classical? Toward a Reconstruction of Niels Bohr׳s philosophy of physics, 201 Howard, 2004, Who invented the "Copenhagen Interpretation?" A study in mythology, Philosophy of Science, 71, 669, 10.1086/425941 Kalckar, J., (Ed), Niels Bohr Collected Works, Vol. 6: Foundations of Quantum Physics I (1926-1932), 1985, North-Holland; Amsterdam. Kalckar, J., (Ed), Niels Bohr Collected Works, Vol. 7: Foundations of Quantum Physics II (1933-1958), 1996, North-Holland; Amsterdam. Landau, 1981, Volume 3 Lieb, 1976, The stability of matter, Review of Modern Physics, 48, 553, 10.1103/RevModPhys.48.553 Murdoch, D., Niels Bohr׳s Philosophy of Physics, 1987, Cambridge University Press; Cambridge. Pusey., 2012, On the reality of the quantum state, Nature (Physics), 2309 Postnikov, E. B. and Loktionov, A. A., Visualization of a particle's wave function in the double slits experiment. arXiv:1307.6604v1, 2013. Rugh, S.E., Zinkernagel, H. (2005). Cosmology and the meaning of time (76 pp.) Unpublished manuscript, Available upon request. Rugh, 2011, Weyl׳s principle, cosmic time and quantum fundamentalism, 411 Rugh, S.E., Zinkernagel, H. (2013). A critical note on time in the multiverse. In Karakostas, V., Dieks, D. (Eds.) Recent Progress in Philosophy of Science: Perspectives and Foundational Problems (pp. 267–279). Berlin: Springer. Rugh, S.E., Zinkernagel, H. (2016). Schrödinger׳s cat and the conditions for quantum description(s) (in preparation). Schlosshauer, 2007 Schlosshauer, M., Camilleri, K. (2008), The quantum-to-classical transition: Bohr׳s doctrine of classical concepts, emergent classicality, and decoherence, arXiv:0804.1609v1 [quant-ph] Tanona, 2004, Idealization and formalism in Bohr׳s approach to quantum theory, Philosophy of Science, 71, 683, 10.1086/425233 Tanona, 2013, Decoherence and the Copenhagen cut, Synthese, 190, 3625, 10.1007/s11229-012-0216-6 Zeilinger, 1999, Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics, Reviews of Modern Physics, 71, S288, 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S288 Zinkernagel, 2006, The philosophy behind quantum gravity, Theoria, 21, 295, 10.1387/theoria.522 Zinkernagel, 2011, Some trends in the philosophy of physics, Theoria, 71, 215, 10.1387/theoria.1853 Zinkernagel, 2015, Are we living in a quantum world? Bohr and quantum fundamentalism, Vol. 1, 419