Using ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction to enhance radiotherapy of glioblastoma

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology - Tập 147 - Trang 1355-1363 - 2021
Chanjuan Peng1,2, Yong Wu3,2, Yang Yang4,2, Ningning Li5,2, Xi Chen1,2, Linhui Gu6,2, Dong Xu1,2, Chen Yang1,2
1Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
2Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
3Department of Medical Engineering, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
4Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
5Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
6Department of Core Facility Service, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China

Tóm tắt

To investigate the efficacy and mechanism of ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) combined with radiotherapy (XRT) on glioblastoma. The enhanced radiosensitization by UTMD was assessed through colony formation and cell apoptosis in Human glioblastoma cells (U87MG). Subcutaneous transplantation tumors in 24 nude mice implanted with U87MG cells were randomly assigned to 4 different treatment groups (Control, UTMD, XRT, and UTMD + XRT) based on tumor sizes (100–300 mm3). Tumor growth was observed for 10 days after treatment, and then histopathology stains (HE, CD34, and γH2AX) were applied to the tumor samples. A TUNEL staining experiment was applied to detect the apoptosis rate of mice tumor samples. Meanwhile, tissue proteins were extracted from animal specimens, and the expressions of dsDNA break repair-related proteins from animal specimens were examined by the western blot. When the radiotherapy dose was 4 Gy, the colony formation rate of U87MG cells in the UTMD + XRT group was 32 ± 8%, lower than the XRT group (54 ± 14%, p < 0.01). The early apoptotic rate of the UTMD + XRT group was 21.1 ± 3% at 48 h, higher than that of the XRT group (15.2 ± 4%). The tumor growth curve indicated that the tumor growth was inhibited in the UTMD + XRT group compared with other groups during 10 days of observation. In TUNEL experiment, the apoptotic cells of the UTMD + XRT group were higher than that of the XRT group (p < 0.05). The UTMD + XRT group had the lowest MVD value, but was not significantly different from other groups (p > 0.05). In addition, γH2AX increased due to the addition of UTMD to radiotherapy compared to XRT in immunohistochemistry (p < 0.05). Our study clearly demonstrated the enhanced destructive effect of UTMD combined with 4 Gy radiotherapy on glioblastoma. This could be partly achieved by the increased ability of DNA damage of tumor cells.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alexander BM, Cloughesy TF (2017) Adult glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 35(21):2402–2409 Al-Mahrouki AA et al (2014) Cellular characterization of ultrasound-stimulated microbubble radiation enhancement in a prostate cancer xenograft model. Dis Model Mech 7(3):363–372 Briggs K et al (2014) Non-invasive monitoring of ultrasound-stimulated microbubble radiation enhancement using photoacoustic imaging. Technol Cancer Res Treat 13(5):435–444 Carruthers RD et al (2018) Replication stress drives constitutive activation of the DNA damage response and radioresistance in glioblastoma stem-like cells. Cancer Res 78(17):5060–5071 Chabowski M et al (2018) Comparison of microvessel density using nestin and CD34 in colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 38(7):3889–3895 Chou TC et al (1994) Computerized quantitation of synergism and antagonism of taxol, topotecan, and cisplatin against human teratocarcinoma cell growth: a rational approach to clinical protocol design. J Natl Cancer Inst 86(20):1517–1524 Cui H et al (2017) Ultrasound mediated microbubbles destruction augmented sonolysis: an in vitro and in vivo study. Biomed Res Int 2017:7021929 Czarnota GJ (2015) Ultrasound-stimulated microbubble enhancement of radiation response. Biol Chem 396(6–7):645–657 Czarnota GJ et al (2012) Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(30):E2033–E2041 Daecher A et al (2017) Localized microbubble cavitation-based antivascular therapy for improving HCC treatment response to radiotherapy. Cancer Lett 411:100–105 Deng H et al (2018) Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles enhance radiosensitization of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem 48(4):1530–1542 Dong Q et al (2018) Opening the blood-brain barrier and improving the efficacy of temozolomide treatments of glioblastoma using pulsed, focused ultrasound with a microbubble contrast agent. Biomed Res Int 2018:6501508 Eisenbrey JR et al (2018) Sensitization of hypoxic tumors to radiation therapy using ultrasound-sensitive oxygen microbubbles. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 101(1):88–96 El Kaffas A, Czarnota GJ (2015) Biomechanical effects of microbubbles: from radiosensitization to cell death. Future Oncol 11(7):1093–1108 El Kaffas A, Giles A, Czarnota GJ (2013) Dose-dependent response of tumor vasculature to radiation therapy in combination with Sunitinib depicted by three-dimensional high-frequency power Doppler ultrasound. Angiogenesis 16(2):443–454 El Kaffas A et al (2014) Dll4-notch signalling blockade synergizes combined ultrasound-stimulated microbubble and radiation therapy in human colon cancer xenografts. PLoS ONE 9(4):e93888 El Kaffas A et al (2018a) Tumour vascular shutdown and cell death following ultrasound-microbubble enhanced radiation therapy. Theranostics 8(2):314–327 El Kaffas A et al (2018b) Role of acid sphingomyelinase and ceramide in mechano-acoustic enhancement of tumor radiation responses. J Natl Cancer Inst 110(9):1009–1018 Fan CH et al (2019) Enhancing boron uptake in brain glioma by a boron-polymer/microbubble complex with focused ultrasound. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(12):11144–11156 Garcia-Barros M et al (2003) Tumor response to radiotherapy regulated by endothelial cell apoptosis. Science 300(5622):1155–1159 Gusyatiner O, Hegi ME (2018) Glioma epigenetics: from subclassification to novel treatment options. Semin Cancer Biol 51:50–58 Huang P et al (2013) A novel therapeutic strateGy using ultrasound mediated microbubbles destruction to treat colon cancer in a mouse model. Cancer Lett 335(1):183–190 Huaying S et al (2016) Transglutaminase 2 inhibitor KCC009 induces p53-independent radiosensitization in lung adenocarcinoma cells. Med Sci Monit 22:5041–5048 Jing Y et al (2019) Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction improved the antiangiogenic effect of Endostar in triple-negative breast carcinoma xenografts. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 145(5):1191–1200 Kim HC et al (2013) Effects of biophysical parameters in enhancing radiation responses of prostate tumors with ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 39(8):1376–1387 Klein J et al (2020) Effect of treatment sequencing on the tumor response to combined treatment with ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles and radiotherapy. J Ultrasound Med 39:2415–2425 Kolesnick R, Fuks Z (2003) Radiation and ceramide-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 22(37):5897–5906 Lai P et al (2016) Breast tumor response to ultrasound mediated excitation of microbubbles and radiation therapy in vivo. Oncoscience 3(3–4):98–108 Lammertink BHA et al (2016) Increase of intracellular cisplatin levels and radiosensitization by ultrasound in combination with microbubbles. J Control Rel 238:157–165 Lieberman FS et al (2019) Phase 2 study of radiation therapy plus low-dose temozolomide followed by temozolomide and irinotecan for glioblastoma: NRG oncology RTOG trial 0420. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 103(4):878–886 Lin L et al (2018) UTMD-promoted co-delivery of gemcitabine and mir-21 inhibitor by dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles for pancreatic cancer therapy. Theranostics 8(7):1923–1939 Nofiele JT et al (2013) Ultrasound-activated microbubble cancer therapy: ceramide production leading to enhanced radiation effect in vitro. Technol Cancer Res Treat 12(1):53–60 Santivasi WL, Xia F (2014) Ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage, response, and repair. Antioxid Redox Signal 21(2):251–259 Shen H et al (2015) Sensitization of glioblastoma cells to irradiation by modulating the glucose metabolism. Mol Cancer Ther 14(8):1794–1804 Shen ZY et al (2016) The effects of percutaneous ethanol injection followed by 20-kHz ultrasound and microbubbles on rabbit hepatic tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142(2):373–378 Sulman EP et al (2017) Radiation therapy for glioblastoma: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement of the american society for radiation oncology guideline. J Clin Oncol 35(3):361–369 Tran WT et al (2012) Microbubble and ultrasound radioenhancement of bladder cancer. Br J Cancer 107(3):469–476 Xiao AY et al (2019) Sodium sulfide selectively induces oxidative stress, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction and radiosensitizes glioblastoma (GBM) cells. Redox Biol 26:101220 Yang C et al (2015) Quantitative correlational study of microbubble-enhanced ultrasound imaging and magnetic resonance imaging of glioma and early response to radiotherapy in a rat model. Med Phys 42(8):4762–4772