The Human Brain Project: Responsible Brain Research for the Benefit of Society

Neuron - Tập 101 - Trang 380-384 - 2019
Arleen Salles1,2, Jan G. Bjaalie3, Kathinka Evers1, Michele Farisco1,4, B. Tyr Fothergill5, Manuel Guerrero1,6,7, Hannah Maslen8, Jeffrey Muller9, Tony Prescott10, Bernd C. Stahl5, Henrik Walter11, Karl Zilles12, Katrin Amunts12,13
1Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
2Centro de Investigaciones Filosóficas (CIF), Buenos Aires, Argentina
3Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
4Science and Society Unit, Biogem, Biology and Molecular Genetics Institute, Via Camporeale, Ariano Irpino (AV), Italy
5Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
6Division of Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
7Department of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, University of Chile, Chile
8The Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
9Human Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Campus Biotech, Batiment B1, Chemin des Mines 9, CH-1202 Geneva, Switzerland
10Department of Computer Science and Sheffield Robotics, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
11Division of Mind and Brain Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
12Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-1, Structural and Functional Organisation of the Brain, Forschungszentrum Juelich, GmbH D, 52425 Juelich, Germany
13Cecile und Oskar Vogt Institute for Brain Research, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Changeux, 2017, Climbing brain levels of organisation from genes to consciousness, Trends Cogn. Sci., 21, 168, 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.004 D’Ambrosio, 2017, Extending epigenesis: from phenotypic plasticity to the bio-cultural feedback, Biol. Philos., 32, 705, 10.1007/s10539-017-9581-3 Dehaene, 2007, Cultural recycling of cortical maps, Neuron, 56, 384, 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004 Evers, 2016, Neurotechnological assessment of consciousness disorders: five ethical imperatives, Dialogues Clin. Neurosci., 18, 155, 10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.2/kevers Farisco, 2017, The intrinsic activity of the brain and its relation to levels and disorders of consciousness, Mind Matter, 15, 197 Prescott, 2017, Robots are not just tools, Connect. Sci., 29, 142, 10.1080/09540091.2017.1279125 Rommelfanger, 2018, Neuroethics questions to guide ethical research in the international brain initiatives, Neuron, 100, 19, 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.021 Salles, 2018, Neuroethics and philosophy in responsible research and innovation: the case of the human brain project, Neuroethics Stahl, 2018, The role of ethics in data governance of large neuro-ICT projects, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 25, 1099, 10.1093/jamia/ocy040 Storm, 2017, Consciousness regained: disentangling mechanisms, brain systems, and behavioral responses, J. Neurosci., 37, 10882, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1838-17.2017
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Neuron

Tập 101

380-384

Thông tin tác giả