Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability - Tập 22 - Trang 13-17 - 2016
Harriet Bulkeley1, Lars Coenen2,3, Niki Frantzeskaki4, Christian Hartmann5, Annica Kronsell6, Lindsay Mai1, Simon Marvin7, Kes McCormick8, Frank van Steenbergen4, Yuliya Voytenko Palgan8
1Department of Geography, Durham University, United Kingdom
2Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE), Lund University, Sweden
3Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute (MSSI), Melbourne University, Australia
4Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands
5Joanneum Research, Austria
6Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden
7Urban Institute, Sheffield University, United Kingdom
8International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE), Lund University, Sweden

Tài liệu tham khảo

JPI Urban Europe, 2013 Edwards-Schachter, 2012, Fostering quality of life through social innovation: a living lab methodology study case, Rev Policy Res, 29, 672, 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00588.x Lehmann, 2015, Living lab as knowledge system: an actual approach for managing urban service projects?, J Knowl Manag, 19, 1087, 10.1108/JKM-02-2015-0058 Franz, 2015, Designing social living labs in urban research, Emerald Insight, 17, 53 Voytenko, 2016, Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda, J Clean Prod, 123, 45, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053 McCormick, 2015, Learning through renovations for urban sustainability: the case of the Malmö Innovation Platform, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 16, 44, 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.011 Evans, 2016, Trials and tribulations: problematizing the city through/as urban experimentation, Geogr Compass, 10, 429, 10.1111/gec3.12280 Karvonen, 2014, Urban laboratories: experiments in reworking cities, Int J Urban Reg Res, 38, 379, 10.1111/1468-2427.12075 2016, The Experimental City: New Modes and Prospects of Urban Transformation Bulkeley, 2013, Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change, Trans Inst Br Geogr, 38, 361, 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x Bulkeley, 2015, Smart grids and the constitution of solar electricity conduct, Environ Plan A, 48, 7, 10.1177/0308518X15596748 Frantzeskaki, 2010, Towards governing infrasystem transitions, reinforcing lock-in or facilitating change?, Technol Forecast Soc Change, 77, 1292, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.05.004 McCormick, 2013, Advancing sustainable urban transformation, J Clean Prod, 50, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.003 McGuirk, 2014, Practices, programs and projects of urban carbon governance: perspectives from the Australian city, Geoforum, 52, 137, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.007 Wolfram, 2016, Cities and systemic change for sustainability: prevailing epistemologies and an emerging research agenda, Sustainability, 8, 144, 10.3390/su8020144 Smith, 2012, What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, Res Policy, 41, 1025, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Technol Anal Strateg Manag, 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651 Grin, 2010 Liedtke, 2012, LIVING LAB: user-driven innovation for sustainability, Int J Sustain High Educ, 13, 106, 10.1108/14676371211211809 Evans, 2015, Living labs and co-production: university campuses as platforms for sustainability science, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 16, 1, 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.005 Frantzeskaki, 2016, Designing a knowledge co-production space for urban environmental governance, Environ Sci Policy, 62, 90, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010 Truffer, 2015, The geography of sustainability transitions: contours of an emerging theme, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 17, 63, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.004 Raven, 2016, Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 18, 164, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002 Evans, 2011, Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city, Trans Inst Br Geogr, 36, 223, 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x Evans, 2014, ‘Give me a laboratory and I will lower your carbon footprint!’ — urban laboratories and the governance of low-carbon futures, Int J Urban Reg Res, 38, 413, 10.1111/1468-2427.12077 Hodson, 2010, Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?, Res Policy, 39, 477, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020 Maassen, 2012, Heterogeneity of lock-in and the role of strategic technological interventions in urban infrastructural transformations, Eur Plan Stud, 20, 441, 10.1080/09654313.2012.651807 Monstadt, 2009, Conceptualizing the political ecology of urban infrastructures: insights from technology and urban studies, Environ Plan A, 41, 1924, 10.1068/a4145 Shove, 2007, CAUTION! transitions ahead: politics, practice and sustainable transition management, Environ Plan A, 39, 763, 10.1068/a39310 Ekers, 2008, The power of water: developing dialogues between Foucault and Gramsci, Environ Plan D: Soc Sp, 26, 698, 10.1068/d5907 McGuirk, 2016, Configuring carbon governance in the city: insights from Australia, Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 106, 145 Avelino, 2011 McGuirk, 2004, State, strategy, and scale in the competitive city: a neo-gramscian analysis of the governance of ‘Global Sydney’, Environ Plan A, 36, 1019, 10.1068/a36131 Allen J: Power as an immanent affair: Foucault and Deleuze’s topological detail. Lost Geographies of Power. Blackwell Publishing; 2003: 65-91. Avelino F: Power-in-transition: reconstructing power dynamics in sustainability. Presented at the Anniversary MSc Environmental Governance (MEG), Public Lecture Series Sustainability – Power and Change. Freiburg; 2014.