Deregulation, competition, and consumer choice of insurer: Evidence from liberalization reform in China’s automobile insurance market

GENEVA Risk and Insurance Review - Tập 47 - Trang 158-200 - 2021
Wei Zheng1,2, Yi Yao1,2,3, Peng Shi4, Yinglu Deng5, Hao Zheng6
1Department of Risk Management and Insurance, School of Economics, Peking University, Beijing, China
2China Center for Insurance and Social Security Research, Peking University, Beijing, China
3Institute of Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China
4Department of Risk Management and Insurance, Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
5PBC School of Finance, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
6School of Insurance, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China

Tóm tắt

In 2015, the China Insurance Regulatory Commission initiated a liberalization reform in the automobile insurance industry to grant insurers more discretion in policy design, underwriting, and ratemaking. The deregulation intended to increase competition and choices for the consumer, yet there was little scientific evidence on how the insurance market responded to the reform. This article examines the effectiveness of this deregulation reform in China. Leveraging a large industry dataset of more than 7 million automobile insurance policies from 63 major automobile insurers operating in China, we study policyholders’ switching behavior among insurance providers. To better understand the heterogeneity in the impact of deregulation on market performance and consumer choice, we further analyze the switching pattern among different types of insurers according to the insurer's size, the company’s business structure, the jurisdiction’s market power, and the customer’s risk type. Overall, the empirical results suggest that the reform has met its original goal, leading to higher market competition, and more diversified consumer choices. We further confirm that the average premium dropped significantly after the reform for all three jurisdictions implementing the reform, yet the insurers’ pricing strategy was risk type dependent, i.e., the average premium for the high-risk customers increased, while the average premium for the low-risk customers decreased substantially.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bajtelsmit, V.L., and R. Bouzouita. 1998. Market structure and performance in private passenger automobile insurance. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 65 (3): 503–514. Cummins, J.D., and M. Rubio-Misas. 2006. Deregulation, consolidation, and efficiency: Evidence from the Spanish insurance industry. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 38 (2): 323–355. Cummins, J.D. 2002. Deregulating property–liability insurance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Dafny, L.S. 2010. Are health insurance markets competitive? American Economic Review 100 (3): 1399–1431. de Jong, J.D., A. van den Brink-Muinen, and P.P. Groenewegen. 2008. The Dutch health insurance reform: Switching between insurers, a comparison between the general population and the chronically ill and disabled. BMC Health Services Research 8 (1): 58–67. Grabowski, H., W.K. Viscusi, and W.N. Evans. 1989. Price and availability tradeoffs of automobile insurance regulation. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 56 (2): 275–299. Hendriks, M., J.D. de Jong, A. van den Brink-Muinen, and P.P. Groenewegen. 2009. The intention to switch health insurer and actual switching behavior: Are there differences between groups of people? Health Expectations 13 (2): 195–207. Honka, E. 2014. Quantifying search and switching costs in the U.S. automobile insurance industry. RAND Journal of Economics 45 (4): 847–884. Jaskow, P.L., and R.G. Noll. 1994. Deregulation and regulatory reform during the 1980s. In American economic policy in the 1980s, ed. Martin Feldstein, 367–440. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kole, S.R., and K. Lehn. 1997. Deregulation, the evolution of corporate governance structure, and survival. American Economic Review 87 (2): 421–425. Peng, S.C., C.S. Li, and C.C. Liu. 2016. Deregulation, pricing strategies, and claim behavior in the Taiwan automobile insurance market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 52 (4): 869–885. Pope, N., and Y.L. Ma. 2005. Market deregulation and insurer pricing strategies: The Japanese experience. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice 30 (2): 312–326. Schlesinger, H., and J.M. von der Schulenburg. 1991. Search costs, switching costs and product heterogeneity in an insurance market. Journal of Risk and Insurance 58 (1): 109–120. Schlesinger, H., and J.M. von der Schulenburg. 1993. Consumer information and decisions to switch insurers. Journal of Risk and Insurance 60 (4): 591–616. Turchetti, G., and C. Daraio. 2004. How deregulation shapes market structure and industry efficiency: The case of the Italian motor insurance industry. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice 29 (2): 202–218. Van Rooijen, M.R., J.D. de Jong, and M. Rijken. 2011. Regulated competition in health care: Switching and barriers to switching in the Dutch health insurance system. BMC Health Services Research 11 (1): 95–105. Weiss, M.A., and P.B. Choi. 2008. State regulation and the structure, conduct, efficiency and performance of U.S. automobile insurers. Journal of Banking and Finance 32 (1): 134–156. Winston, C. 1993. Economic deregulation: Days of reckoning for microeconomists. Journal of Economic Literature 31 (3): 1263–1289.