A Biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score Predicts Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy and Adverse Surgical Pathology in a Racially Diverse Population of Men with Clinically Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer

European Urology - Tập 68 - Trang 123-131 - 2015
Jennifer Cullen1, Inger L. Rosner2, Timothy C. Brand3, Nan Zhang4, Athanasios C. Tsiatis4, Joel Moncur2, Amina Ali1, Yongmei Chen1, Dejan Knezevic4, Tara Maddala4, H. Jeffrey Lawrence4, Phillip G. Febbo4, Shiv Srivastava1, Isabell A. Sesterhenn5, David G. McLeod2
1Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
2Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
3Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, USA
4Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA
5Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, MD, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Dall’Era, 2012, Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature, Eur Urol, 62, 976, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.072 Conti, 2009, Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer, J Urol, 181, 1628, 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.107 Müntener, 2008, Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 53, 767, 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.016 van den Bergh, 2014, Novel tools to improve patient selection and monitoring on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review, Eur Urol, 65, 1023, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.027 Sartori, 2014, Biomarkers in prostate cancer: what's new?, Curr Opin Oncol, 26, 259, 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000065 Simon, 2009, Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers, J Natl Cancer Inst, 101, 1446, 10.1093/jnci/djp335 Febbo, 2011, NCCN task force report: evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 9, S1, 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0137 McShane, 2012, Publication of tumor marker research results: the necessity for complete and transparent reporting, J Clin Oncol, 30, 4223, 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.6858 Brassell, 2009, The Center for Prostate Disease Research (CPDR): a multidisciplinary approach to translational research, Urol Oncol, 27, 562, 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.023 McShane, 2005, Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK), J Natl Cancer Inst, 97, 1180, 10.1093/jnci/dji237 Epstein, 2005, The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma, Am J Surg Pathol, 29, 1228, 10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1 Knezevic, 2013, Analytical validation of the Oncotype DX prostate cancer assay—a clinical RT-PCR assay optimized for prostate needle biopsies, BMC Genomics, 14, 690, 10.1186/1471-2164-14-690 Klein, 2014, A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling, Eur Urol, 66, 550, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.004 Cookson, 2007, J Urol, 177, 540, 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.097 Preston, 2011, The prognostic significance of capsular incision into tumor during radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 59, 613, 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.005 Therneau, 2000 Therneau, 1990, Martingale-based residuals for survival models, Biometrika, 77, 147, 10.1093/biomet/77.1.147 Freedland, 2005, Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, JAMA, 294, 433, 10.1001/jama.294.4.433 Davis, 2014, Novel commercially available genomic tests for prostate cancer: a roadmap to understanding their clinical impact, BJU Int, 114, 320 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Prostate cancer (version 1.2015). NCCN Web site. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf. Accessed November 6, 2014. Badani KK, Kemeter MJ, Febbo PG, et al. The impact of a biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score on treatment recommendations for men with newly diagnosed clinically prostate cancer who are candidates for active surveillance. Urol Pract. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urpr.2014.10.010 Farrell, 2013, Genetic and molecular differences in prostate carcinogenesis between African American and Caucasian American men, Int J Mol Sci, 14, 15510, 10.3390/ijms140815510 Rosen, 2012, Differences in frequency of ERG oncoprotein expression between index tumors of Caucasian and African American patients with prostate cancer, Urology, 80, 749, 10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.001 Khani, 2014, Evidence for molecular differences in prostate cancer between African American and Caucasian men, Clin Cancer Res, 20, 4925, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2265 Powell, 2013, Genes associated with prostate cancer are differentially expressed in African American and European American men, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 22, 891, 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1238 Platz, 2000, Racial variation in prostate cancer incidence and in hormonal system markers among male health professionals, J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, 2009, 10.1093/jnci/92.24.2009 Klein, 2013, Evidence for a field effect in early prostate cancer: gene expression profiles in normal-appearing prostate tissue adjacent to tumor are predictive of clinical outcome [abstract 5029], J Clin Oncol, 31 Schlomm, 2009, Molecular cancer phenotype in normal prostate tissue, Eur Urol, 55, 885, 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.105 Hanahan, 2011, Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation, Cell, 144, 646, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013