Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study

The Lancet Oncology - Tập 21 - Trang 222-232 - 2020
Peter Ström1, Kimmo Kartasalo2, Henrik Olsson1, Leslie Solorzano3, Brett Delahunt4, Daniel M Berney5, David G Bostwick6, Andrew J Evans7, David J Grignon8, Peter A Humphrey9, Kenneth A Iczkowski10, James G Kench11, Glen Kristiansen12, Theodorus H van der Kwast7, Katia R M Leite13, Jesse K McKenney14, Jon Oxley15, Chin-Chen Pan16, Hemamali Samaratunga17, John R Srigley18
1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
3Centre for Image Analysis, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
4Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
5Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
6Bostwick Laboratories, Orlando, FL, USA
7Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
8Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
9Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA.
10Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
11Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
12Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
13Department of Urology, Laboratory of Medical Research, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
14Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
15Department of Cellular Pathology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
16Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
17Aquesta Uropathology and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
18Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Tài liệu tham khảo

Loeb, 2011, Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare, J Urol, 186, 1830, 10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.057 Egevad, 2019, The International Society of Urological Pathology Education web—a web-based system for training and testing of pathologists, Virchows Arch, 474, 577, 10.1007/s00428-019-02540-w Adesina, 2013, Improvement of pathology in sub-Saharan Africa, Lancet Oncol, 14, e152, 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70598-3 Robboy, 2013, Pathologist workforce in the United States: I. Development of a predictive model to examine factors influencing supply, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 137, 1723, 10.5858/arpa.2013-0200-OA Ozkan, 2016, Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer, Scand J Urol, 50, 420, 10.1080/21681805.2016.1206619 Melia, 2006, A UK-based investigation of inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies, Histopathology, 48, 644, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02393.x Bejnordi, 2017, Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer, JAMA, 318, 2199, 10.1001/jama.2017.14585 Esteva, 2017, Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks, Nature, 542, 115, 10.1038/nature21056 Silver, 2016, Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search, Nature, 529, 484, 10.1038/nature16961 Gulshan, 2016, Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs, JAMA, 316, 2402, 10.1001/jama.2016.17216 Gummeson, 2017, Automatic Gleason grading of H and E stained microscopic prostate images using deep convolutional neural networks Källén, 2016, Towards grading gleason score using generically trained deep convolutional neural networks, 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 1163 Jiménez del Toro, 2017, Convolutional neural networks for an automatic classification of prostate tissue slides with high-grade Gleason score Arvaniti, 2018, Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning, Sci Rep, 8, 10.1038/s41598-018-30535-1 Litjens, 2016, Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis, Sci Rep, 6, 10.1038/srep26286 Campanella, 2019, Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images, Nat Med, 25, 1301, 10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1 Grönberg, 2015, Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50–69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study, Lancet Oncol, 16, 1667, 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00361-7 Ström, 2018, The Stockholm-3 model for prostate cancer detection: algorithm update, biomarker contribution, and reflex test potential, Eur Urol, 74, 204, 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.028 Epstein, 2016, The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system, Am J Surg Pathol, 40, 244, 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530 Nir, 2019, Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques to evaluate performance of a classifier for automatic grading of prostate cancer from digitized histopathologic images, JAMA Netw Open, 2, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0442 Egevad, 2018, Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading, Histopathology, 73, 8, 10.1111/his.13471 Szegedy, 2016, Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2818 Deng, 2009, ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 248, 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 Chen, 2016, XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System, Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785, 10.1145/2939672.2939785 van der Maaten, 2008, Visualizing high-dimensional data using t-SNE, J Mach Learn Res, 9, 2579 Nagpal, 2019, Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer, NPJ Digit Med, 2, 48, 10.1038/s41746-019-0112-2 2018, AI diagnostics need attention, Nature, 555, 285, 10.1038/d41586-018-03067-x Kweldam, 2016, Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists, Histopathology, 69, 441, 10.1111/his.12976 Egevad, 2017, Pathology Imagebase— a reference image database for standardization of pathology, Histopathology, 71, 677, 10.1111/his.13313 Goodfellow, 2015, Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples, arXiv
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

The Lancet Oncology

Tập 21

222-232

Thông tin tác giả