The role of culture in risk regulations: a comparative case study of genetically modified corn in the United States of America and European Union

Agencies, U.B.R., 2004. US Database of Completed Regulatory Agency Reviews, from http://www.usbiotechreg.nbii.gov. 1996 Backstrand, K., 2002. Precaution, Scientisation or Deliberation? Green Environmental Decision Making. Paper presented at the ECPR, Joint Sessions Workshop 10. Barber, 1996 Barboza, D., 2001. As biotech crops multiply, consumers get little choice. New York Times, June 10. Bernauer, T., Meins, E., 2001. Scientific Revolution Meets Policy and the Market: Explaining Cross-National Differences in Agricultural Policy. GMA 2000, Adelaide. BNA, 1996a. Chemicals, pharmaceuticals company cites further progress on environmental goals. International Environmental Reporter 19 (11), May 29, Bureau of National Affairs. BNA, 1996b. Commission postpones decision on genetically modified maize seed. International Environmental Reporter 19 (16), August 7, Bureau of National Affairs. BNA, 1996c. Green groups, industry continue to battle over trade in genetically modified organisms. International Environmental Reporter 19 (19), September 19, Bureau of National Affairs. BNA, 1996d. Regulatory body rejects approval of genetically modified maize seed. International Environmental Reporter 19 (9), May 1, Bureau of National Affairs. BNA, 1997a. Austria, Luxembourg to ban use, import of genetically modified maize seed. International Environmental Reporter 20 (4), February 19, Bureau of National Affairs. BNA, 1997b. Commission approve use of genetically engineered corn seed. International Environmental Reporter 20 (1), January 8, Bureau of National Affairs. BNA, 1997c. Commission to require labeling of food with genetically modified soybeans, maize. International Environmental Reporter 20 (20), October 1, Bureau of National Affairs. BNA, 1998. Parliament stalls EU attempts to force Austria, Luxembourg to repeal ban on GMO. International Environmental Reporter 21 (20), September 30, Bureau of National Affairs. Bowen, 1999 Buonanno, L., Zabloneny, S., Keefer, R., 2001. Politics versus science in the making of a new regulatory regime for food in Europe. European Integration Online Papers 5(12). Caldwell, 1990 Commission of the European Communities, 2001. Commission Improves Rules on Labelling and Tracing of GMOs in Europe to Enable Freedom of Choice and Ensure Environmental Safety. Brussels. Comstock, 2000 Cranor, 1990, Some moral issues in risk assessment, Ethics, 101, 123, 10.1086/293263 De Marchi, 1999, Risk management and governance: a post-normal science approach, Sci. Direct, 31, 743 Deibert, 1990, Agricultural biotechnology: public perception of risk Douguet, 2003, Maintaining the integrity of the French terroir: a study of critical natural capital in its cultural context, Ecol. Econ., 44, 233, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00276-8 Dowding, 1996 Dowie, 1995 Echols, 1998, Food safety regulation in the European Union and the United States: different cultures, different laws, Columbia J. Eur. Law, 4, 525 ERS, 2004. Agricultural Biotechnology: Adoption of Biotechnology and its Production Impacts, from http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/biotechnology/chapter1.htm. Europa, 2001. Deliberate Release into the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms. Web page: http://www.europa.eu.int/scadplus/printversion/enlvb121158.htm/. Ewens, 2000, Seed wars: biotechnology, intellectual property, and the quest for high yield seeds, Boston Coll. Int. Comp. Law Rev., 23, 285 Falcon, 2001, Sustainable science for a sustainable environment: comments on searching for sustainability, Ecol. Law Q., 27, 1163 FDA, 1998. Policy for Foods Developed by Biotechnology: Education/Compliance Program 1995, 2000, from http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov (August 12). Florida, U., 2004. Biotechnology in the United States, from http://agbiotech.ifas.ufl.edu/usa.html. Franks, 1999, The status and prospectus for genetically modified crops in Europe, Food Policy, 24, 565, 10.1016/S0306-9192(99)00059-7 Gaivoronskaid, G., Solem, K.E., 2000. The Debate on the Risk of Genetically Modified Food. The Politics of Science, vol. 5. 2001 Gaskell, 2001, Troubled waters: the Atlantic divide on biotechnology policy Goss, 1996, Guiding the hand that feeds: toward socially optimal appropriability in agricultural biotechnology innovation, California Law Rev., 84, 1395, 10.2307/3480997 Gottlieb, 1993 Guehlstorf, 2004 Harper, 2003, Green carnivores, mad cows, and gene tech: the politics of food in Hungarian environmentalism, Anthropol. East Eur. Rev., 21 Harvey, 1996, Humans and the environment in America's past, OAH Mag. History, 10, 5, 10.1093/maghis/10.3.5 Hervey, T.K., 2002. Queen's Papers on Europeanization 3/2002. Europeanization of the Regulation of GM Products: Science or the Citizen? University of Nottingham, Nottingham. Hettinger, 1995, Patenting life: biotechnology, intellectual property, and environmental ethics, Boston Coll. Environ. Affairs Law Rev., 22, 267 Holtzman, 1989 Hood, 2001 Hunter, 1999, European regulation of genetically modified organisms Krimsky, 1999, Symposium: the profit of scientific discovery and its normative implications, Chicago-Kent Coll. Law Rev., 75, 1 Liebert, U., 2001. Constructing Monetary Union: Euro-Skepticism and the Emerging European Public Space. Working Papers, Jena Monet-Centre for European Studies. Lipschutz, 1996 McGlouglin, M., 1999. We’ll Starve Without Biotech: Genetic Engineering is Subject to More Safeguards than Many Unaltered Foods We Eat 2001, from www.biotechknowledge.com/ (November 11). Meins, E., 2001. Explaining the Stringency of Consumer Protection: The Case of Labeling of Genetically Modified Food. ECPR Workshop, The Politics of Food. Merchant, 1993 Mukeji, 1991 Naik, 2000, Biotechnology through the eyes of an opponent: the resistance of activist Jeremy Rifkin, Virginia J. Law Technol., 5, n1 NRC, 2002 PABE, 2001. Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe. Brussles. Petite, M., 1998. The Treaty of Amsterdam. Working Papers, The Jean Monnet-Centre for European Studies. Pistorius, 1999 Plutzer, 1998, Ideology and elites’ perceptions of the safety of new technologies, Am. J. Polit. Sci., 42, 190, 10.2307/2991752 1997 Quayle, D., 1991. Report on National Biotechnology Policy. The President's Council on Competitiveness, Washington, DC. Ray, L., 1999. When Parties Matter: The Conditional Influence of Party Positions on Voter Opinions about European Integration. Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association. Rippel, B., 1998. Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: Differences Between the U.S. and Europe. Web page: http://www.foodstuff.org/News/OnthePlate/bio-tech.htm/. Rosso-Grossman, 2000, Regulation of genetically modified organisms in the European Union, Am. Behav. Sci., 44, 378, 10.1177/00027640021956260 Schweiger, T., 2000–2001. Eu Enlargement and Genetically Modified Organisisms: Chasing a Moving Target – The Implications of EU Accession for Eastern European Agriculture and Food Policy: ANPED – The Northern Alliance for Sustainability. Sergerson, 1985 Shapiro, 2000 Shrader-Frechette, 1985 Somers, M.R., 1995. “What's Political or Culture About Political Culture and the Public Sphere? Toward an Historical Sociology of Conception Formation.” Sociol. Theory 13 (2), 113–114. Stone, 1989 Strydom, 2002 Thiele, 2000, Limiting risks: environmental ethics as a policy primer, Policy Stud. J., 28, 540, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2000.tb02047.x Treweek, 1996, Ecology and environmental impact assessment, J. Appl. Ecol., 33, 191, 10.2307/2404742 Vogel, D., 2001. The Regulation of GMOs in Europe and the United States: A Case Study of Contemporary European Regulatory Politics. Web page: http://www.cfr.org/public/pubs/Victor_ModFood_Paper2.html/. Wallace, 1995, Democracy or technocracy? European integration and the problem of popular consent Wedeen, 2002, Conceptualizing culture: possibilities for political science, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 96, 713, 10.1017/S0003055402000400 Winter, G. (2001). Food industry agrees to tighter standard on food labeling. New York Times, May 31.